June 3, 2007...8:27 am
Why Only Submissive Men Can Save the World
I have been hanging around on BDSM chat rooms and forums for years and, yeah, I’ve (occasionally) been to real life stuff too (how else do you think I am so damn well informed) and I have seen it all before.
And of course, when I say how much I *heart* male submission and wibble on about being the male submissives’ fangirl, it doesn’t mean that – like pretty much all faces of masculine sexuality – it can’t be a little self centred/blinkered/fucking annoying at times.
For example: I cruise around these websites looking and see these winsome messages/blog posts/personal ads saying stuff like: The long search begins!
Which quickly becomes: Is there no one willing to do revolting things to me?
Hey, excuse us boys, if we’re not queuing up to perform whatever ever revolting sexual service your nasty little brains have dreamed up without a single care for our own dirty screwed-up needs.
(Although, conversely, don’t just say stuff like you’re in charge, it’s whatever you want. And act as if that is some kind of dream ticket. It’s about the place in between. Where my fucked up stuff meets yours and we find something shiny and new. That’s where the magic lives. I have an ad on a board somewhere that makes some reference to wanting something very specific and the implication there is that I want someone who wants that too – not that I want about one email a week pointing out to me that, of course, I can have anything I want because I’m a fucking dom – as if I am an idiot for specifying.)
But meanwhile, back in the world of frustrated, rejected submissive men: Oh, oh, they bleat, there must be a woman somewhere who wants to come round every Wednesday and perform elaborate CBT by shutting my knackers in the fridge door. Why have no women come forward, why, why? Now I am going to have to live a life of utter misery and loneliness because *all* women are so selfish and they wont give me a chance to prove how much I, I mean they, will enjoy the whole fridge door - knackers equation.
Fuck me, for a group of people who are supposed to be unconcerned with the fulfillment of their own needs male subs don’t half carp on about those needs sometimes. And, yes, I want you to have needs. I find that kind of hot. But I also want you to have a sense of fucking perspective.
i sent an imagination-free revoltingly pornographic 3 line email to a Superior Domina and she didn’t even bother to reply, despite the fact i asked her lots of personal and downright rude questions probably to do with pussy worship
Shall we all take a moment to wipe away a tear?
Dominatrixes might at least bother to email back and say ‘No thank you’
Oh yes, because I’ve seen the dingy little websites your sort enjoy and they’re full of ultra polite doms saying things like oh, no thank you, dear.
Because, yes, you know, I can see you. I see where you go and what you do when the whole finding an actual woman thing doesn’t work out. You go and blow it all in the bad places. I’ve see your world full of evil horrible plasti-doms, prodoms, findoms, urgh. It’s scary and dangerous out there for a submissive man.
But you like it like that, right? Of course you do. You built this place. You fucking bank roll it. You own shares in the company. You’re the fucking board of directors. And every horrible scary fake-femdom out there is as black and shiny as every other boy’s toy.
You don’t? You hate all this stuff that is made out of false crap. All these endless rounds of femdom theatre. Posturing, self serving, woman-repelling, black PVC clad nastiness. All this stuff that feeds and feeds and feeds the image of you - submissive men - as worthless, useless, dirty creatures who have needs no real women would ever want to indulge.
Okay, fine. But you need to accept that the worst aspects of femdom – the women who exploit men, who do wrong, who make porn that hates us, who fill femdom with falsehood are enabled by you. By sub men. The crap stuff has nothing to do with dom women, because those women aren’t actual dom women – but it has everything to do with sub men. Sorry – it does.
Only individual male subs can sort this. You built this place. You need to fix it. You have the blueprints. You know how it’s wired. Which is the truth of every problem. Most of the horrible things that perpetuate in femdom do so because male subs keep fucking funding them. (Or sometimes just encouraging them – but it’s hand in pocket time one way or another.)
Male subs have so much power, not just in femdom but in the world. You should use it. Stop eyeing each other suspiciously because you think you are competing for the attention of the only 3 actual dom women in the universe and work together.
And why the fuck don’t sub men support each other more?
I know you. You are driven and energetic and the majority of you are middle aged, middle class white males. I bet you if someone did the stats male submissives would come out as one of the highest earning groups of perverts on earth. No wonder so many people are targeting your kink pounds and trying to keep your eyes off the ball.
The only way to improve the situation is for you, yes you, all of you, to put selfishness aside and change the world. Stop being revolted by yourselves/your sexuality/each other. Change everything. If submissive men stopped funding the horrible woman hating Fem!Dom! industry, if you all just stopped, you could solve all your problems over night. You hold all the damn cards, you bastards. I could write this blog for a million years and it would make no difference if I didn’t have submissive men on my side.
So saddle up and go save the world. Save us dom women and new-dom women and would-be dom women from a fate worse than sexual marginalisation. Brave knights, all of you - make some sacrifices.
And I have faith in submissive men. So don’t let me down.


41 Comments
June 3, 2007 at 2:16 pm
Lots of questions are popping up in my head, as I read you. Hope you don’t mind that I am using your blog as one of my current figure-out-your-sexuality encyclopedias.
Did you know they’ve shut down all the user-created chatrooms on yahoo? You should say something about that here. Maybe, all the sex bloggers can start an online petition against it - they were some of the most fantastic places to hunt for BDSM partners with titles like “dom woman”, “tickling”, “doctor’s room”, “role-play”, etc. Now you have yahoo’s boring categories like “20s love”, “30s love”, “hot tub,” etc.
Ummm, what are the other BDSM chatrooms and forums that you’ve been hanging out on? Maybe, you could link to some good ones on your blog or sidebar. Please?
If a woman’s sexuality heavily depends on BDSM, do you think it affects the rate of orgasms occurring? And do you think that it’s weird, that someone who is on the one hand heavy on BDSM activity, on the other hand doesn’t know whether they’ve ever had an orgasm until their late 20s?
Anyway, good blog. I do hope you get an offer for publication and your feminism is out in print. I agree with you when you say that you can be a dom whether you are on the top or lying under. I also empathise with you whole-heartedly when you talk about how it takes effort to create the dom world. It’s quite tiring; I’d rather someone else make the effort to say the right d/s words and direct the play! It’s exhausting to find yourself with a man who doesn’t know how the damn thing works.
June 3, 2007 at 3:22 pm
Even though I started Femdom Dating and Femdom Romance with much of this in mind I’m still pessimistic about the fate of the world.
June 3, 2007 at 3:30 pm
Again and again, you articulate this problem so well. I have stopped looking for sub men to play with because I am so fed up with what they post as personals and in the emails they send me. Always the question is: “What are you going to do to me?” I might try to explain to these men that 1.) their first responsibility is to find out about me, the person who is going to give them what they want, rather than making the whole interaction about their “sub” demands, and 2.) it isn’t my job to construct and act out the sexual drama they desire (especially when they won’t tell me what they *actually* desire), EXCEPT explaining would be pointless. I have tried on occasion to explain the first, and they just get angry with me. So, if sub guys wonder why we dom women don’t return their emails, that’s it. But, BJ, you have articulated this much better than I have in your blog. I just needed to say it out loud.
I have played with one particular sub man, and it was everything I and he could have dreamed it would be. Here were the things he did right to make that happen: He got to know me as a person via email. He never demanded anything of me; he asked me about my fantasies and offered up his own. We played with fantasies via email before meeting, so we both knew what turned each other on. When we met and played, he was flexible about our play - not rigid, demanding, and pouty if it wasn’t exactly what he had envisioned. And the most important thing, the thing that made him an amazing person to play with - he participated 100% in the play with moans, movements, speaking, and intense engagement with me throughout the whole time we were together. It was a form of making love, with all the intimacy and fusion that the phrase implies.
I can’t say this clearly enough: if you, as a sub, only want something done to you, no one is really going to *want* to do it. She may be willing to be paid to do it, but she’s not going to want to do it. If, however, you want to do something WITH someone - and you are willing to put a little work into making sure it is truly a “with” relationship - you will see that doms are all over the place and are delighted to play with you. As BJ notes, there are a lot of closet doms and burned doms who will melt like butter to a well-written ad or email.
With the man I described above, I was more aroused and fulfilled than I had ever been in my vanilla or kink life. I LOVED it. So count me as one dom who will no longer participate in something I love, because the pool of sub men out there just don’t understand. BJ advocates banding up and changing the whole female dom culture, which would be a wonderful thing. But understand that you, all on your own, can hugely improve your ability to find a good dom if you change the way you approach dom women.
June 3, 2007 at 3:38 pm
This post is so brilliant and terse. I wish I could condense my thoughts like this.
And you’re so right: in general and historically men only support each other’s sexuality if they implement their sexual desire by conquering or dominating either less powerful men, gay men or women.
People aren’t very comfortable just saying they like deviant things either, even when politically they say “fuck your norms.”
You’ve expressed real issues with your own sexuality yourself. Why would you expect submissive men to stop hating themselves when you seem to feel deep down that you should be ashamed of wanting to hurt men?
And why should you feel ashamed for wanting to hurt men, when for so long men have built alliances, businesses (like the fem-dom business), countries based on their ability to feminize their victims? (Not that women haven’t also supported these structures, I’m not bashing men here, just explaining some factors that contribute to men feeling their pleasure is all that matters).
You made me think of something by separating “fem” from “dom” above. Put a woman in a corset and a man in a collar, but if you’re still forcing her to wear make-up and those you-can’t-run-too-far shoes, she’s still playing fem/bottom/one-with-less-control, and he’s still holding the power. But put him in those heels and you’re cementing that idea that all associated with woman-ness is powerless. Just the whole existence of polar genders makes it impossible for equality to exist: but I guess we can dress up and beat them once in a while.
June 3, 2007 at 3:58 pm
There is a big problem with the dom-sub system. Online, I get turned off immediately when they ask me what I am wearing, or describe to them how I look. More than the ideological problems I have with these things, I am too damn impatient to get into all that when my mind is clearly elsewhere. I put the person on ‘ignore’ instantly. Because I cannot afford to lose that feeling. I know it can turn some people on to watch each other on camera or look at a pic, but why can’t they understand that I am too impatient to get there? They are not interested in being a dom or a sub, I tell you. They just want to please their silly eye. How does it matter how I look when the only instruments you need here are the right reactions and the right words? Thankyou for this blog, bitchy.
In spite of all this, why am I so unsure about whether I have ever had an orgasm? I started attempting masturbation only recently and have vaguely had some orgasm-like feelings during that time and even prior to that maybe. But don’t know whether those were orgasms: quick breathing, wetness, the pleasant, knotted pressure-like feeling in my lower abdomen as if something needed to be pushed out, and the sweet, tight itch in my pussy. Are these all just half-orgasms or parellel ones? How does one find out?
June 3, 2007 at 4:22 pm
Well, yes, this post sums things up very nicely. Rather brilliant, proud you’re my bud and all, hugs.
I could say that I don’t understand women in femdom being treated as *objects for male satisfaction*, but, I’d be lying. It’s as simple as the history of male/female sexuality in total, isn’t it, men hunting and using women. (Not *all* men, plenty of good guys out there, just referring to the long view history of sexual relations.)
The thing that does puzzle me, though, is that this objectification of women seems to be more pervasive in this corner of the yard than in all of the other spots on the playground at the moment.
Which is awfully ass backwards.
Anyway, I think that if real people look for real people who just might be the yin to their yang, throw out the frickin’ rule book for pete’s sake, yin to the yang, real people, there would be a lot less pissing and moaning online….of course then you’d be out of a blog and have to start blogging about taxes or global warming……or rude shop clerks.
thanks again as always, hugs, E
June 3, 2007 at 5:08 pm
Oh, everyone has been rather verbose since I slapped this up this morning.
Thank you.
Not sure if I can answer everything. How’s this. Things will get better, but this may take a long time. I *will* get better, but this may also have a long time. One day there will be no need for this blog. Or there will, but it will just been one long jolly romp about my ambrosia filled sex life in a world that adores me.
I don’t always get what I want - who does? - but I’m really willingly to put the effort in this time.
June 3, 2007 at 5:20 pm
I was so incensed that I had to watch that damn Mini commercial 27 times.
June 3, 2007 at 5:31 pm
Only 27? Are you busy today?
June 4, 2007 at 11:23 am
Jones, I doubt things will change, last time I checked men of a certain type ran this world and they are unlikely to just hand it over.
Sure it’s ok to allow women the pretence of having a little power and leadership, such as in the pro dom world you love to rant about so much or when a woman is allowed to become president of a nation with endemic sexism just because her father or husband was a leader.
Most women are happy with the current situation because the reality is that in real life the majority of men are submissive to women, even if they don’t know it. How many men in vanilla relationships hand over so much of the control of their lives to the women they live with? How many men are prepared to sacrifice so much of their dignity and cash just on the off- chance they may get a little female attention or even sexual contact. Seems to me that the average man is already so pussy whipped that he is only a few steps from your ideal world anyway! Unfortunately for you it is the other men that have a bit more influence or those that have escaped the need to pander to women that are unlikely to change.
June 4, 2007 at 2:40 pm
Other than “like all them smart people above here just said”, I’d point out that “being revolted by yourselves/your sexuality/each other” (at the very end of our post) is probably a big part of what makes many “submissive” men tick. I’ve been thinking for a while that the concept of “submissive male” needs a lot of unpacking. And while I agree with your whole post, I’d submit (lovely word, that) what you’re looking for is not a submissive male, but a
- Sex positive
- High self-esteem
- Pain-loving
- Reasonably self-aware
submissive male. And I don’t think there are that many of those around.
June 4, 2007 at 3:19 pm
Jamie, I am prepared to admit I am not that smart, but as far as I know pain-loving just doesn’t exist in normal animals, (including humans), sure through some pavlovian training you can get some animals to accept a certain amount of pain for rewards but there is always a level where the pain is not worth it! So if it is abnormal to enjoy pain and you class yourself as pain loving then surely the only answers are that you are no longer normal, by natural definition or that you really don’t think that the person hurting you will really go that far.
I suspect that is the view of most submissives, they trust whoever is abusing them not to exceed rational limits and they hope the pleasure that the abusor gets is as satisfying or more than than the pain they feel.
I remember a long while ago having a conversation in a whisky bar in Green Park with a hooker who wwas in the middle of a lesbian relationship, amazingly I was listening to her despite there not being any chance of screwing her! She told me that she was a pro-dom because her girlfriend didn’t want her to have sex with men any more. She was bi so I wondered what she thought of her sub clients and if she was ever interested in men again would she ever sleep with any of them. She told me that she could never take a man seriously if she had fucked him in the ass - I am sure that is just one womans opinion but I can certainly see where she was coming from.
June 4, 2007 at 4:27 pm
Prodoms are not the same as sexually dom women. A lot of dom women feel nothing but ohmigod-terrifyingly-powerful love for a man who can be vulnerable like that before them.
I’m not the biggest fan of strap on sex, as I have said before, but the sacrifice of male submission blows my mind. If the women you spoke to didn’t see that then her opinion doesn’t mean a great deal to me.
June 4, 2007 at 4:37 pm
Well, like I say she was only doing the domination thing because her girlfriend didn’t want her having sex with men, before that she had just been a regular hooker. I guess it validates a lot of what you say about pro dom women! When I was living in Bangkok they tried to get a S&M club going in Sukhumvit, I went along with a few friends and even though I am not experienced in this scene, the girls just looked so uncomfortable and clearly din’t know what to do. I remember the drinks were seriously expensive by Thai standards So I guess the bar was designed to appeal to your stated demographic in todays blog!
June 4, 2007 at 4:49 pm
Submissive men’s wallets are hot property. This is such a huge problem. So many people want their money. So many people are working to convince them that the only way to get what they need is to pay for it.
I don’t want their money. I just want everything else.
June 4, 2007 at 5:02 pm
Well Jones, you would think your lack of interest in men’s wallets in such a predatory world would mark you out as some shining beacon to these guys - unless they really do need the cash dynamic to retain their belief that they are in control!
June 4, 2007 at 6:05 pm
Toni - consider “pain loving” an elision for “gets off on the endorphins that get released when intense stimulation is applied.” But that doesn’t sound nearly as fun as “Whip me now…. please…”
June 4, 2007 at 6:13 pm
Ah! You know, even though I love his pain and one of the things I think I love best of all is the fact that he does not like it - that he is submitting to it for my pleasure… that thing, the thing where he asks for pain.
Oh! Guh!
I like him to ask for it, knowing that he is going to hate it, knowing that it is going to go past the point of it being something erotic, but to still ask. Just because he knows that turns me on.
June 4, 2007 at 6:33 pm
See Jones, that is just wrong, (from my vanilla point of view), you are getting off on something that hurts the other person - so this whole “we both enjoy it” doesn’t apply anymore, you have replaced it with him giving up what little psychological respect he had for himself, (I doubt he had any), to give you a mental and physical rush. Now don’t get me wrong, I understand that is what it is all about for you and whatever consenting dude you can get to do this, but tell me have you ever misjudged or are you always sure the sucker you have with you is going to give it all up? Also, have you ever revealed your wicked desires only to be met with flat refusal. For some reason I have an image of Hugh Grant in full 4 weddings tog saying “oh god, no I am not into that at all - please excuse me”
June 4, 2007 at 6:39 pm
Oh god, yes.
Many, many times.
June 4, 2007 at 9:30 pm
Bitchy, I can’t avoid noticing how interesting it is to charge submissive men of something so active as saving the world: images of Super- Heroes in cloaks and tight clothing being submissive come to my mind and,well…if you say they can save Humankind, I take you’re right.
Those mails you describe are really accurate and the dom’s equivalent I know are equally stupid. The difference is they do not use “i” intentionally.
I was going to do a highly complicated comment,but I keep imagining the SSH ( Submissive Super-Hero) and my brain stops. So I’ll just say I fully understand what you meant, though I cannot escape the fatality I prefer sadistic/dom males.
By the way,Toni, there are deep waters’s fishes ( those who are related to sharks ) whose mating is rather violent,involving bitings, blood, etc. Besides generalizing from other animals to humans the way you do it is just a scientific mistake.
June 4, 2007 at 10:02 pm
Saving the world is quite a noble self-sacrificing thing to do. That can sit quite well with submissive men for me - or at least the way I see male submission.
June 4, 2007 at 10:07 pm
This is very very off topic but…I watched Casino Royal today. The scene with Daniel Craig…and the chair…and the rope….
June 4, 2007 at 10:13 pm
Oh yes.
Elizabeth wrote about that a while ago
I still haven’t seen it. As a rule James Bond does not do a lot for me. Is it worth it?
June 4, 2007 at 10:15 pm
I hope to save the world one day! Then I might have a reason for the temple/statue of myself I am planning to build after the next market correction. Oh Coralina, (was that too trite)? I think that using the deep water, cold-blooded fishes as an example of sexuality is stretching things a little too far, don’t you? Having said that, I recall reading somewhere that the male angler fish is born without any intestines at all and has to find a female to lock onto within a certain period of time or it dies. The male once it taps into the female releases some sperm into the females circulatory system when it is ovulating and then just withers away. When the fish was first examined they thought it was some parasite, but it just turned out to be the remains of males that had mated with the female. The point I was making is we as humans are a bit above that sort of thing. You will have to do a bit better to convince me that rational human beings seek pain.
June 4, 2007 at 10:19 pm
Goddamnit. I am trying to at least keep up some kind of pretence that this is a sex blog.
Maybe less fish-sex talk?
June 4, 2007 at 11:08 pm
Casino Royale is worth of it!
Not only for that scene ,but also because,during the whole film,you see a sensitive and vulnerable Bond.
Of course,when he’s naked ,being spanked in his balls with a rope by a villain crying blood,he’s even more vulnerable :D!
June 5, 2007 at 2:09 am
Hey Bitchy, one thing I’ve learnt about sub men is that an enormous amount of them are going through a prolonged nervous breakdown and the truth is they really don’t know what they want. They flit here and there from every new fetish they see on the net and are not quite sure whether they want to call the shots, have the shots called for them or indeed what the fuck the shots are.
I know this as I worked as a ‘house slave’ for a pro bdsm house for a couple of years where I met many seriously insane subs.
I’m afraid to say I can only think of one I’d cheerfully invite back to my place for a cup of tea.
These were of course the ‘prodomme’ subs.’Lifestyle’ subs are perhaps less messed up but I doubt it. I read all those blogs by tiresome whiny sub men seeking dommes and I see more fuckedupness.
I was messed up myself for years but fortunately my problems were ironed out by a domme with a clear head, some counselling and a lot of chilling.
Of course the vanilla world is also fucked up and so I suppose is life in other star systems so in the big scheme of things being fucked up is normal and nothing to be ashamed of.
I confess to being bored by the Bond film. Blondie Bondy is always running everywhere chasing people instead of simply shooting them. It’s more like Chariots of Fire than 007. The testicle scene was fun though but I expect you can see that on youtube.
June 5, 2007 at 12:28 pm
Coralina; http://www.fetishman.co.uk/ is a place of submissive superhero goodness.
I’d hazard that eliminating pro-dommes entirely is no more realistic than eliminating any other form of prostitution, but I appreciate your quest to prevent the pro-domme from being representative. I read a few sex worker blogs, and one thing that seems to come up a lot is that men who use money to get women will then act surprised when the women they get only want their money and don’t ‘love’ them…it seems pretty clear that the male subs would have as much to gain from saving the world as you would, and not just financially. But on the other hand, there’s clearly something appealing about paying for domination. It’s the path of least resistance, I guess?
And Casino Royale is awesome, so long as you can avoid laughing at the first fifteen minutes or so. I’ve read fanfics about Judi Dench’s M being dommy at dear darling JB…
June 5, 2007 at 4:27 pm
I only watch one film a week. I am not sure if I am yet convinced I should make Casino Royale that film.
However, I do love fanfic. Perhaps I should go that way.
I just wish femdom liked me
June 5, 2007 at 5:42 pm
By speaking about films, there aren’t that many featuring a good scene of torture, at least with the duplicity we can watch in Casino Royale.
I’m sure your fanfiction would be as interesting as your blog,Bitchy. Perhaps you should make like Elizabeth and create a blog just for your fictional writings.
And,incidentally,it’s not a traditional femdom blog which got appointed for a prize. Perhaps intelligent and mature men are also getting sick of such a concept.
June 5, 2007 at 7:12 pm
Perhaps intelligent and mature men are also getting sick of such a concept.
Intelligent men do not get sick of seeing women in tight, uncomfortable leather clothing, brandishing whips and strap-ons.
I don’t see any of that around here, so there must be some kind of mistake. Where did you say the femdom blogs were?
June 5, 2007 at 7:51 pm
No, Tom, don’t leave.
What if I brandish this apple - does that help?
June 5, 2007 at 9:37 pm
What if I brandish this apple - does that help?
I find computer-savvy women to be sexy, but waving one around seems rather pointless…
June 6, 2007 at 10:20 am
I’m back…and it’s like I’ve never been away…except the stats counter seems to have advanced quite a long way…
Well I have to say there is a certain je ne sais quoi that I like about this post. It’s something I can’t quite put my finger on. The idea of the world being saved by a man who has decided to submit to physical punishment. I find that quite compelling.
It reminds me of something I read somewhere.
The trouble is your not being hard enough on submissive men. You’re encouraging them to get out there and save the world. You should order them to do it…
Too much carrot in this post and not enough stick
June 6, 2007 at 10:24 am
It’s funny you should say that…
Just give me a couple of hours
June 8, 2007 at 1:03 pm
I think I finally figured out why I’m jealous of you: you seem to be able to articulate the things that I think but can’t get across right without making people think I’m taking things “too personally and passionately” and is thus invalid (i.e., not logical) reasoning. Damn you, how do you do that??
June 8, 2007 at 3:43 pm
Well if I knew how I did it I could make my fortune telling other people how to write mildly successful (non)sex blogs about their dirty paraphilias.
Thank you. I’m jealous of you too. You are a lot better looking than me.
August 12, 2007 at 4:03 pm
The femdom and financial dom question begins with the law of supply and demand — one of those things that is difficult to change or work around, and especially so when many people involved don’t see the big picture as fish don’t know that air exists, even when they are starving for oxygen and some mytical force urges them to leap out of their element in an arching path over the sluggishly flowing river. Or an earthworm does not know about water until the bank caves in after a storm and he becomes… fishfood. But I digress, and cryptically so, eh?
In our case, the big picture involves similar reality, but words as well, in that words do shape reality, as you so often mention.
I am not a submissive. I will, however, submit to greater authority, higher skill, or even to some weaker woman who can show me something interesting, useful, or heart-stopping.
A dominant female friend used to complain that there were no real subs out there, they were all selfish hypocrites.
Think about that, because I tend to agree. No, there’s nothing wrong in being selfish (given proper time and place), but that hypocritical factor is what’s killing things.
I am selfish. I am not a submissive, but I may submit, and not because I must, but because it’s common sense that if you offer what I need almost above life and breath, then I’m your man!
But even if you threaten to tie me down, wiggle my prostate gland until I’m dying for more, and then tell me I gotta allow you to shove a needle through my glans before you’ll give me more… even then, I’ll allow it because I want to and it’s my choice (no harshness intended).
The male-female problem is caused in “our” culture by the fact that there are no male initiations…. not real ones. And there haven’ t been any since Europe was cunningly converted to a middle eastern nature-hating religion of self-abnegation those many centuries ago.
No male is a man until he he has passed through some transformative experience of “initiation.” Some nowadays manage to fall into such experiences by accident, as I did. By and large, however, self-justification and fear of being naughty, uncool, hateful, or what have you — hypocrisy, in other words, keeps most males far away from areas where transformative experiences may be encountered. And males tend to be willfully ignorant about this. Willful ignorance, you see, is the real basis of all “sin.”
So there you have it.
Start creating a core of men around you and then put them to work in your cause.
What’s that?
A Mistress (or better, Mystress) is a female master, who directs the work of others.
Yes, men and women are different, similar to the way that odd and even numbers are different, having different properties.
Men (even mere males), tend to be better suited to DOING, as in doing the heavy labor, fighting, and other tasks.
Women, on the other hand, tend to be better at KNOWING, which sometimes really does include… Knowing what men ought to be doing!
Sayonara!
September 12, 2007 at 4:25 pm
(I just wound up linking this post in my sad excuse for a blog when I swear I was really looking for a different one of yours. Something about how submissive men are conditioned to presenting pro-dommes with their shopping list of kinks and don’t know how to approach dominant women as equal human beings? Did you really write that, or did I just make it up?)
September 12, 2007 at 4:37 pm
I love your blog.
I can’t think of a specific post about that. But I know just what you mean. Prodoms teach submissive men this weird entitlementism. (They also sometimes teach them to call all dominant women mistress for the rest of their lives and forever - no matter what the actual women herself wants.
I assume they tell the guys that for wanky-spanky-kerching-kerching reasons, never thinking that four years later that guy will come up to me at a munch and….)
Leave a Reply