July 17, 2007...11:44 pm
The Unfairest of Them All
I am a beautiful, bewitching, magnificent, delightful, beautiful, gorgeous, elegant, beautiful, incredible, attractive superior domina goddessessess: as soon as you see me in my magnificence you will have no choice but to submit.
You’re not on the wrong blog, btw. That was satire.
But it’s pretty much what you get on many of the multiple and myriad websites dedicated to off-the-peg pro-am femdom.
Dominant women are beautiful. And that’s why the guy gets on his knees. That is what he worships. Her beauty.
I don’t just mean in porn - I mean the whole ’story’ of femdom runs along these lines.
It’s pretty interesting that, where men have decided to allow women to have ‘power’ for their own wanky needs, that this is the kind of power they choose to give her. The power of being desired. A completely passive power.
And I’ve told you before dominant sexuality is all about *desiring*. Dominant sexuality is active – not passive.
*Wanting* not being wanted.
*Demanding* not being demanded.
But the beautiful Amazon thing is woven into the fabric of femdom (black PVC – since you ask).
Prodoms play this trope the most. Amateurs do too of course, but you can’t have failed to notice that prodoms are always *beautiful*. It says so on their websites. (They’re all always models too. This is, like, the law, or something.)
This particular beauty myth - it’s the whole *dominatrix* industry really. That fucking web of misogyny. It’s wrapped in this your-pretty-is-your-worth shit. The way prodom/fetish modelling/fetish art/fetish fucking cabaret twists my sexuality to fit it into their saleable-commodity box, by telling me it’s about beauty, still hurts me over and over though.
Why yes. It’s this. Again.
My sexuality being stolen from me, repackaged as something totally offensive and then sold for someone else’s profit at the expense of my dignity and sexual freedom, what should I do? Say nothing? As my one little beacon of truth – my tiny attempt at explaining how this stuff really feels – vanishes under a tidal wave of lies and glorified stunt-cunt-sadism and stupid fucking shoes.
I’m not going to let it go in the name of kinky glamarama and sequins falling like rain. Everything is not okay under the glitter. Okay?
One of the ways sexual minorities (and women in particular) are oppressed is by not being allowed control of their own sexualised images.
The images of dominant women that prevaricate are not authored by dom women (don’t bother starting a ‘true dom’ exchange with me – in fact, fuck OFF).
Having your sexuality marginalised, confiscated, having your voice silenced, having your sexual fantasies and your sexual reality locked up in a box because it is *so* *fucking* *scary* and replaced by media-friendly/man-friendly/dick-hardening imagery that makes you cry and cry and try and hold your heart back together with your bare hands because you really don’t know what you ever did to make the world hate you so much, is just sexual oppression.
Here’s how it works:
Women who have sex with other women are scary, so TPTB undermines them by erasing their reality and replacing them with this.
Women who are sexually dominant are scary, so TPTB undermines them by erasing their reality and replacing them with this.
(I know, I know, three of them are in collars and one is wearing wrist cuffs. (True, some of them are labelled as “submissive/dominatrix” – but that scarcely helps.) I love that the people who steal my sexual identity care about it so fucking much. Perhaps we should pause here to ask: Are prodoms *really* dominant? It’s a meaningless question really, isn’t it? Especially when you see a bunch of women who so obviously understand it’s most complex nuances so deeply.)
Also, yeah, funny how the female sexualities that are so-fucking-scary (dykes ‘n’ doms) are also the ones that seem to top the male fantasy chart. Don’t ask me why that should be. Ask a man, if you can stop him wanking long enough – actually there are these devices you can get…
Yez –the dominatrix. ‘The whip-wielding she-devil of the male bottom’s deepest dreams‘. (That quote is not from a cheesy website, btw, it is from a modern BDSM anthology from a right-on publisher. *That’s* how ingrained this trope is. It’s unquestioned and everywhere. He’s desiring. She’s totally fucking passive. She might have a whip - but she’s not a *person* in her own right - she’s the product of his dreams.)
My name is Bitchy Jones. This is the story of how I died.
Of how my sexuality was stolen from me by a bunch of profiteering men and prettyish catalogue models. Who then told me I couldn’t play because submissive men would only submit to a magnificent goddess.
I know some other way-cool female doms who don’t get bothered by stuff like I do. They shrug and walk away. I don’t. I must be missing some kind of tough outer casing that most doms have. The other day I saw this fucking thing online – a film of a fem!dom! stage show – and I felt so disenfranchised from my own sexuality that it made me cry.
There was this dom woman in the full domme-drag: black shiny catsuit, tight pony tail and lovely I-can’t-smile-or-my-clown-make-up-will-crack face.
And she had a strap on. Not even a nice one. One that looked like a big vile veiny cock. (And I *like* *cock* - but, you know, a real man’s cock is a genuine special miracle the way it can be so fucking ugly and so damn beautiful at the same time. Make the same thing out of plastic and it just doesn’t work.) It looked like something from a joke shop.
And she was doing a stage show with her slave - all sexay.
And her slave was a woman, naturally. Because only women are interesting to look at sexually. Jesus. Hello, is that the speaking clock, yes could I check what year it is?
In the show, she bends her over and makes like fucky-fuck, except she’s really clearly, just pushing it between slavo’s legs and they’re both making big O-mouth faces like it’s so motherfucking horny that beautiful Mistress is making slave-girl bend over before the almighty power of (veiny plastic) COCK….
(See, now, when I complain about strap-ons, it’s not *you* - it’s stuff like this.)
I don’t often link directly to things I’m offended by, but, by Christ, I want you to see what this woman has strapped to her feet.
When I look at this stuff, I feel like I’m the dumpy speccy kid at school and the older prettier girls have taken something from me and they’re throwing it around out of my reach and laughing.
Give it back! Give it back! Give my sexuality back!
Stop, stop! You’re getting it all dirty! You’re breaking it! You’re ruining it! Give it back! It’s mine!
Please, please. Just give it back! …I know you’re prettier than me and you have more social cache. And you’re making easy money. And, yeah, why should you stop? Except that it’s mine. And you’re hurting me. And it would be the right thing to do.
Oh, yes, of course, I forgot the part where you were an evil sadistic bitch. Yes, I can hear your amusing sadistic cackle. It’s very good. No, you’re right, I don’t do sadist-laughter. I’m more likely to burst into tears, if you must know. My dominasty powers were mistakenly made of hand blown glass – due to an administrative error.
This kind of campy dominatrixy drag act makes me feel small and bad inside. I feel ashamed to *be* *like* these women and ashamed that I don’t measure up to them too.
But I understand capitalism. Nothing stops while everyone gets paid. Money is more important than people. I know.
I’m pretty damn certain that this war is over. And I already lost.
See, I’m not beautiful.
Here is the truth. Here is me. I thought, for a long time, even after meeting Pan and doing all the things we did together, that I couldn’t really be a dom because I was not beautiful.
I didn’t think I was allowed to play.
And if you want to know why I have never felt comfortable in the scene as a dominant woman – well, it’s that.
Still is, actually.
I am not beautiful enough to have a man submit to me. And that makes me ashamed of how fucking much I want it.
79 Comments
July 18, 2007 at 1:11 am
Wow.
1) Powerfully written. (I swear you get better all the time, if that’s possible.)
2) That chick wearing the fugly cock thing, OMG, you weren’t kidding. What that has to do whole thing has to do with my sexuality, well, exactly nothing.
3) “beauty”. I know, what the fuck are you going to do. It’s all around us. Normal culture habitually reduces women to the sum of their physical parts, and most femdom seems to do the same thing.
*Personally*, I’d be happier if more female dom bloggers or sites *didn’t* use seductive, stereotypical female imagery because I can’t for the life of me understand why that should symbolize femdom. You know that’s my thing.
I get confused when I try to figure out which came first, the chicken or the egg. I don’t blame all of this section of fuckedupedness on men or commercialization or even general culture, particularly. Maybe it started there, but it could stop so easily…. and (you know *my* opinion), it’s the *women* who can stop it. Just like that. Just say no, those symbols don’t fit me.
I rambled. You wrote beautifully.
hugs, E
July 18, 2007 at 2:14 am
Thank you for writing this post.
July 18, 2007 at 3:04 am
Oh, but Bitchy…I think you’re gorgeous…
but, then…I am right out here on the outside with you…I am not the right age or size or what ever…’cept that I am pretty fucking fantastic. And I am slowly figuring out why…
Kate
July 18, 2007 at 3:21 am
Wow.
Because I agree with you, I do, on how scene imagery is fucked, fucked, fucked.
And hugs, if you want them.
But you’ve also got this little corner to campaign in, and you’re doing it with intelligence and passion, which are things that, unlike beauty, you can’t possibly grow out of. (Unless you develop early memory loss.) Your dominance and attractions are based on things that’ll last.
I’m beginning to think that the only way to fix the world is just to build a little island, resolutely ignore the stupidity of less enlightened places, and invite people to come visit. Then, the good people stay. Eventually, there’s a new little world.
July 18, 2007 at 6:14 am
I wonder how many are truly dominant tho - I think there are a whole lot of pretenders out there who may look good, but don’t have a dominant bone in their body. They just decided it was a quick and easy way to get money. And I happen to know for a *fact* - that some of those Dommes? - aren’t women at all.
One can hire models for photo shoots, after all.
July 18, 2007 at 7:17 am
If you replace the word “writer” with the word “dominatrix” I think you’ll get my views on the subject from the poem below.
http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/16549
But I suppose I should also post some original content, so I will say that I believe that advertising has created an artificial world of impossible standards that they constantly shove down our throats on a million topics, including femdom. These women are not real, they are selling something, and what they are selling is a fantasy.
That guy driving the car at full throttle through hairpin turns over the mountains? That is not us. Even if we do mortgage our house and buy the car we’ll never drive it that fast, because we can’t afford the speeding ticket.
That dom, with the giant plastic penis and 7″ stripper heels? She’s selling fantasy, not reality.
You’re the reality. Normal people, who enjoy a fucking bacon cheeseburger and some ice cream and don’t have perfect hair, and wonder if they’re good enough because some bullshit website or commercial throws up airbrushed pictures of a model with bulimia.
The fantasy is that if you spend enough money, buy the fake boobs and the liposuction and the latex body suit, you’ll be good enough. And you probably will be good enough for a fantasy.
If you want to be good enough for reality, you’re wasting your time buying that shit. No matter how much you spend, it won’t make it come out of your soul.
So there you go. You can try to live up to a fantasy, and you never will. None of us ever will, because we only see those people when they are making a conscious effort to live up to a fantasy stereotype. You’ll never see them when they’re wearing a ratty t-shirt and have a cold, because that’s not the fantasy. Us normal folks have to content ourselves with the reality, and to tell the truth, I like that a lot better anyway.
Because it’s not a load of bullshit.
July 18, 2007 at 8:02 am
This post really hit me hard especially as I’ve been having arguments with a male freind about ‘lesbian’ erotic stories. I find they focus on the wronge things entirely sometimes but this is becuase they are written for men (I assume) or written for the hard tough dykes and as a bisexual female this isn’t what I want.
Sigh.
July 18, 2007 at 8:26 am
I like it when people say ‘wow’
I hope this doesn’t read *just* like - ooh, I have problems with th way I feel about my own physicality and that affects my sexuality. Because then you would be quite justified in saying ‘Welcome to being alive.’
I think there is something more going on in femdom. The lie that being desired is empowering. Something like that.
July 18, 2007 at 8:47 am
As a girl who is submissive - but OHSOFUCKINGSTUBBORN that i might as well not be allowed to be submissive - your post almost made me cry. I literally can feel what you express in this post. I empathize. I sympathize. But you ARE beautiful. Yeah, I know, inner beauty feels like “yada yada”. It’s almost akin to this empowerment of “big beautiful women” (of which I am one) but then the only pictures of bigger models max out at a size 20. It’s like “well, gee, thanks for the effort… but not really”. Just know that you’re OKAY to be you. People understand you and go through these same things. Capitalism and societal standards fuck EVERYTHING up. It doesn’t mean it’s not okay to be who you are… <3
July 18, 2007 at 9:07 am
I think one problem is this. Because kinky people are a minority and marginalised, sometimes all we have are these kinds of latexy images. Vanilla people see normalish looking people in happy relationships amongst their family and friends and on soap operas etc all the time. They see aspirational images, sure, but their sexual reality is all around them too.
My sexual reality isn’t around me much. And once upon a time it was *very* absent.
But I’ve said before that a lot of kinky people don’t have access to the scene. Young women, trying to figure this stuff out, what else do they see?
That’s what happened to me, anyway.
July 18, 2007 at 1:19 pm
Ever have one of those morning where you wake up and instantly realize that you’ve babbled at some length without making any sense whatsoever on a public forum the night before?
Yeah, just had one of those actually.
Sorry about that, in the future I will strive to think before I post, but for now I’m going to go try to find breakfast.
July 18, 2007 at 2:37 pm
because I can’t for the life of me understand why that should symbolize femdom.
I think that Vague nailed the answer right away:
“advertising has created an artificial world of impossible standards”
Maybe not necessarily the advertising itself, but there are certain cultural memes (and I’m not using the term in the bloggy context) and stereotypes which have developed, and which we simply associate with other images and themes.
Why tight leather corsets and thigh boots? Anthropologist Desmond Morris (”The Naked Ape” and other books) once wrote that the shiny, tight clothes resonate with heightened sexuality because they enhance the body, becoming a kind of “super-skin”. There are probably similar resonances in a sociological context that help to make the femdom stereotype persist.
Hell, what am I on about? I’ve got a similar rant about the stereotyping of male submissiveness building up…
July 18, 2007 at 2:56 pm
I really hate sociobiological arguments. The fact is you can prove anything (*cough*Gor*cough) by citing things that happen in ‘nature’, ’cause there’s a lot of nature.
Desmond-fucking-Morris, fuck’s sake… This hurts people, Tom. I don’t see why I shouldn’t point that out. I don’t care if the whole world is like this or wtf. It’s worse in femdom than the rest of the world. The images of desirable femininity here are *more* obscene, *more* unattainable (just look at it for Christ’s sake) because there are so few visible *normal* women. At least in the vanilla world (even in vanilla porn) you see normal women in the media a little bit.
And I don’t give a fucking fuck about leather clothes making men’s dicks hard.
July 18, 2007 at 4:02 pm
This hurts people, Tom. I don’t see why I shouldn’t point that out. I don’t care if the whole world is like this or wtf
Yes, Beej, a lot of things hurt people. I’m just saying that this is how it happens, not that it’s right - or even wrong. It’s just one of those stupid things that happens in real life that we have to learn how to overcome or else we’ll lose our minds by taking it personally.
July 18, 2007 at 4:49 pm
Bitchy, thanks for another wonderful post, and thank-you to the commenters, also. I’m not sure what to add, except that I ruminate on every one of your blog entries, and they have made me think about my dominant nature more than any other single source. When I first encountered Fem!Dom! imagery on the web, and made the realization that *that* was the media’s interpretation of my sexuality, I almost puked. Like you, I feel marginalized and confused when I see that stuff and then look inside at how my own mind and body tick. When I see those rare pictures of normal looking women and men engaging in BDSM play in normal surroundings, I feel reassured. I guess it’s time to go look at my small collection of such images and remind myself that all is still ok in my little corner of the universe, even if it is fucked up most everywhere else.
July 18, 2007 at 4:51 pm
You’ve been awarded
July 18, 2007 at 5:14 pm
Thank you
July 18, 2007 at 6:27 pm
It’s just one of those stupid things that happens in real life that we have to learn how to overcome or else we’ll lose our minds by taking it personally.
I don’t think we need to overcome these things in an internal way. I think we need to overcome them in an external way. I think things can be made better.
Eileen said such an inspiring thing. That maybe just me in my little corner could make a little difference. And maybe someone else will make another little difference too. And then some more women might decide to be part of this culture. And it will get better.
Sometimes what I really think is that I can’t make it better for me. But I can make it better for the next people.
And I believe that. And that’s how *I* don’t lose my mind.
July 18, 2007 at 7:53 pm
Hello Bitchy,
I agree with you about women’s sexuality being taken over, misrepresented, and airbrushed for the benefit of the almighty Euro/Pound/Dollar (i.e. horny heterosexual male paying customers via the producers of the product they purchase).
And I agree with you that women such as ourselves are consistently discouraged from the true expression of our sexuality by populist messages saying we are undesirable, unworthy, unattractive, unacceptable, and just plain wrong, just as males are discouraged from desiring such as us, by being presented with what TPTB want them to want.
And all this because some men are scared stiff (hahaha) that one look at a truly powerful woman will lose them their erection (to loosely quote Jack Nicholson in The Witches Of Eastwick).
It’s also the case that the male customers are losing out (even if they are being provided with suitable wank-fodder) by being presented with the idea that they whom they are being encouraged to desire, are unattainable, and therefore the male is unworthy of attracting any kind of dominant creature.
On the face of it, it doesn’t matter to me what other people do, as mostly what they do is nothing to do with me. If they try to shove it in my face and try to convince me their way is “The Way” and my way is “The Crap”, then that’s a different story. And I know that, in a way, this is what TPTB are doing when they convince lots and lots of people that my way is not what they’re supposed to want.
But most of the time I don’t get upset when other people do stuff I don’t think is my cup of favourite-hot-beverage. I do what I do, and people can like it, or not.
I agree that heterosexual submissive men want to submit to a magnificent goddess. What I don’t agree with is that all magnificence is based on “crack-if-I-smile” makeup and a tight ponytail.
I have seen women whose faces and/or figures were not memorable or interesting in any way, until they began asserting their most genuine authority, at which point they became magnificent in my eyes, and I saw the effect that magnificence had on others. For me it was all about how they carried themselves, how they wore their bodies, their faces, and indeed their own identities.
I feel sure that a person does not have to look like a glamour magazine clone in order to appear magnificent. Most glamour magazine clones do not, in my opinion, look magnificent anyhow.
The more genuinely self-confident, self-enjoying, and self-liking a person appears, I believe has a direct proportional relationship with how attractive and sexy they appear. I know for me, that when I really feel sexy, I look WAAAAAY sexier than when I don’t feel sexy. And I think that’s at the crux of this thing.
I don’t think the female doms who shrug and walk away possess any extra tough outer casing that you yourself are missing. And I don’t think the issue is how everybody else looks, or even how you look. I think the biggie here, is how you feel you look. And I don’t think that how you feel about who you are and how you look, is entirely down to the transgressions committed by TPTB who are responsible for the populist imagery of female domination. I think you had to have come into this with a pre-constructed vulnerability to other people’s transgressions, because otherwise, I don’t think this would all bother you so much. I think the only one holding up a measuring stick to the popular dominatrix image, and saying you don’t measure up, is you. I could be mistaken about this, of course, it’s just the impression I’m getting.
Clearly you are quite beautiful enough and magnificent enough to have a man submit to you. It has happened. It is still happening. It is a fact. I don’t think the men who submitted to you can all have so much brain damage that their submission to you was some weird symptom of an as-yet-undiagnosed mental health disorder (even if there were only two or however many). And who’s to say that the men who submit to those plastic barbie dominatrices aren’t all suffering from Goldblatt-Finklestein Syndrome (also known as plastic-barbie-itis)?
I literally don’t give a shit how others perceive me. If they don’t like me, I won’t interact with them, plain and simple. And through some miracle of I-don’t-know-what, I don’t have a guilt or a shame thing. So if a person says I offended them, I don’t automatically assume that I actually have. More usually, I assume that their anger management issues are being projected onto me so they can avoid taking responsibility for their own behaviour.
This doesn’t mean I don’t make mistakes or don’t care if something I do bothers somebody. When I feel I am responsible for having behaved disrespectfully, I do all I can to make good. But I won’t take that responsibility just because somebody says I should.
I mean, I have my slave address me as “Your Tuna Sandwichness”. I don’t care how fucked up that is, I like it a lot and it makes me and kvetch both smile, especially when I have to thwack him for making a mistake and calling me “Your Tuna Sandwiches”. I don’t care how fucked up anybody thinks that is, and how poorly they think it measures up to anybody else. I like it, and I’m going to carry on doing it, dammit, so there.
This doesn’t mean I don’t have my own pre-constructed vulnerabilities to things. It’s just that, I’m bestest ever pals with most of my neuroses, and I can tell when they are responding directly to something, or simply being triggered when certain transgressions remind them of something.
And now to the reason I started this comment in the first place:
( drumroll, please…….. )
I think I’ve worked out which fem!dom! stage show you’re talking about, and I suspect that if you look closely, the “woman” slave, may really in fact be a biological man, complete perhaps even with surgery to reduce the size of his adam’s apple. But I take your point that he was dressed like a woman, and was close enough to pass convincingly as a woman.
I do think, however, that in this case, the “woman” was a man.
And I’m having trouble believing I wrote all that stuff above, when I started out just wanting to point out that woman-man thingy. Maybe I’ve contracted a variant of Goldblatt-Finklestein Syndrome.
At any rate, an eloquently written cry from the heart, Bitchy. Thank you.
July 18, 2007 at 8:08 pm
I think she’s a woman. She is referred to as a female slave elsewhere on the same website.
July 18, 2007 at 8:25 pm
But I’ve said before that a lot of kinky people don’t have access to the scene. Young women, trying to figure this stuff out, what else do they see?
That’s what happened to me, anyway.
The other night I mentioned to Eileen when we were having dinner that I was glad the Conversio Virium web site is making headway, that people are finding it, that she is now blogging, that the young people I knew were out there and whom I have had the pleasure of helping to (for lack of a better and more humble term) shepherd to the Internet and the rest of the face-to-face community are actually getting out there and wearing their jeans and tank tops and t-shirts to kink events, because that’s the world I live in inside my head all the time.
When I look at the world, whether it be sexuality, academia, the workplace, family life, I have always reacted to the way it should be instead of the way it is, because the way it is is not good enough and the only way to make it better is to pretend it already is.
Eventually, (I hope) people stop thinking that you’re crazy and start playing along. This, I think, is the crux of our differences in approach to community.
One last thing. My favorite quote about sexuality is this one: “Being sexy is about turning yourself on.”
July 18, 2007 at 8:42 pm
Sometimes I think I should be doing that. I should be going out, talking to people, being all proper. (But maybe I shouldn’t start talking about another way I feel inadequate right now.)
The fact is I am not good at that.
I’m better at this.
July 18, 2007 at 10:25 pm
Bitchy -
You’re talking to people here! It’s not about proper. You do what works for you.
Also, there is a teeny tiny smily face way up in the corner of your blog. I have no idea why it’s there, but it makes me happy.
July 18, 2007 at 10:30 pm
Oh that. Yes it is cute. It is me smiling at poor Jimmy in my beautiful header pic.
No, it is actually something wordpress (who are wonderful) put there to collect stats.
July 18, 2007 at 10:55 pm
Wow,wow,wow!So true,so true,so true!
This reality becomes even more explicit when compared with the (fewer) male dom pages: they rarely mention their aesthetic gifts or present themselves on sexy poses ( by comparison to the fem dom’s ones;I’m not stating they’re sexy or not).
Ironically enough,sub websites aren’t so stereotyped perhaps because submission is considered “natural” in women.And I think that’s the trick: dominant women like you scare the idiots of this world.
Those women in the websites feel the need to present themselves as desirable objects prior to state they’re dominants ,never sadists ( with the exception of Mistress Matisse and other few),while male doms do afirm they’re sadists and they want to make us suffer,etc. Objects are harmless,sexually active women are evil,as it seems.
I understand how you feel,because most men go look for fem dom and find those PVCied pros,but ,taking you,Lubyanka,Eillen and Calico,I really don’t know other fem doms who have websites rather than that kind of pros.
The point is a man who goes for the PVC wants the PVC. I doubt he would choose another thing even if it was presented to him but there’s,fortunately,other men who think differently. Pan is an example.
July 19, 2007 at 12:07 am
Your post did indeed carry me away with its beautiful beauty (though I’m tempted to ask - wasn’t prevaricate kinda a loaded word? My brain tripped over that word because I was expecting it to be a prevail, for some reason.)
But. While I totally get why you feel the way you do about the overpaid bondage barbies, it’s not their fault you feel that way. Not even a super-socialist-utopia could legislate against prettiness, or sexual competition, or hurt feelings. Prevention of shame is as much a task for the soul as a task for society. I don’t think you can make them go away; I hope we can make a world that doesn’t discriminate, a world without the assumption that sexually charged images are for men alone, a world where women have as much agency as men - but even such a world would have pretty people raking in money and favours for being pretty and being compliant to the fantasies of people who buy prettiness. It’s not their fault they’re pretty, and you can’t stop them wearing whatever pays the bills.
July 19, 2007 at 3:23 am
Where I live, the pro dommes are prostitutes (literally) who don’t have a clue what bdsm is. They just look good in PVC and have a natural talent for shitting on weak men. Course, it’s perfectly legal over here.
July 19, 2007 at 6:35 am
Thene
I stand by prevaricate, actually. I think it’s okay to call people liars when they are lying about me.
I agree with you. I’m not going to say this isn’t about jealousy. It is. I am jealous of women who get to be dominatixes. I want to. I can’t because the rule is that a dominatrix is a woman that a man submits to because he is overwhelmed by her beauty. I am left out - excluded from my own sexaulity.
Is it their fault? They could stop it. They could say no to being presented this way. They could choose to have their own sexualities presented in a truthful way. They could be honest and strong.
This is so hard for me. I am not anti-sex workers, but I truly feel my own sexual identity is damaged by women who present themselves as dominant but are really just male-kink enablers
Mistress enjoys… well, everything except scat, usually
This is so hard. I think the only solution is for more real women to feel comfortable with their own dominance and if they are more visible the balance is redressed. I guess. But it’s so hard to see that happening without the image of sexually dom women changing and, a the moment, the pretty posse own it.
July 19, 2007 at 11:36 am
Ok Jones, just because you were not part of the pretty girls club, you shouldn’t be so negative about it’s members. Women are always rewarded for being pretty - in all fields. It may be Men that are beehind this, but women are definitely willing participants and judging by the current role models for young women, the situation is, if anything getting worse. The beautiful pro-dommes who you claim have hijacked your sexuality are usually just hookers who have identified a lucrative niche, (doesn’t matter what statistics you may be able to quote to me, BDSM is a niche product). Think of these women as employees - probably well paid employees but on the whole just workers in a huge business, (I remember reading some time ago that the nominal value of the porn industry in Japan alone was equivalent to the GDP of Belgium)!
I am quite interested in the idea that because men pay for the pro-dommes then they are ultimately in control and just pandering to their own kinks. I guess paying for things does change the context somewhat. Consider boxing, under normal circumstances a person would avoid contact with a thug like Tyson, but when he is being rewarded for beating some guy up in a ring he became a sporting icon, feted by millions of people, who if circumstances had been different would be terrified to be near him. The fact that he had been bought, paid for and syndicated reduced the threat- the money was the control.
July 19, 2007 at 11:51 am
Coralina - *cough*, *cough*.
And in general, just to be redundant because it is my favorite point….women can change this. Really. I don’t care who built the house.
Being a sexually dominant woman *isn’t* about catering to or embracing submissive male sexual desires. It just isn’t. I blog because I am, not because I’m hoping to have my email box filled with “How can I serve you beautiful and cruel Mistress?” emails.
Not looking, not interested. Was never the point.
If a lot of women start talking like real people and not cartoon characters set up to serve men (in a backwards fashion), it can change.
The women, the women, the women.
And yes, BJ, I really am going to post on this at some point soon, ’cause it goes straight up my butt.
E
July 19, 2007 at 12:10 pm
I know you’ve said this to me before. I’m not sure I agree.
I suppose because there is a subtle difference between ‘woman can change this’ which I agree with, and ‘woman are to blame for this’ which I don’t.
July 19, 2007 at 12:50 pm
I hear you.
Just don’t really care who is to blame, honestly. I grew up in a general culture where there was so much blame to go around for the way women were treated and perceived, I would have had to spend all of my time sorting it out to figure out who did what first to whom, and then what the woman’s role was in *accepting* and *cooperating* in a culture that treated her that way.
All the same to me, no difference.
Who’s fault was it that when I was 7 and looked in the want ads in the newspaper (don’t ask me why I read the want ads when I was 7, I was a strange, strange child), the jobs were divided into “jobs for men” and “jobs for women”. I am not making this up. Or, girls weren’t allowed to wear pants to school except on gym days and I was fucking freezing in the winter. And fucking outraged.
Or that when I walked into the industry that I now “rule” (please note quote marks, I do not actually rule the *entire* industry), it was completely male dominated and I couldn’t get anyone to talk to me because I was a woman.
I couldn’t give a flying fuck how any of that got that way, I just refused to cooperate with it.
This is not me disagreeing with you. We’re saying nearly the same thing, just from a different angle.
July 19, 2007 at 1:00 pm
Yes. You’re right. We need a proper post on this from you.
I admire the way you go out and get stuff fixed. This is why you “rule” - of course. I just tend to sit around and find more things that are broken. But if we joined forces, that could work out well.
July 19, 2007 at 2:07 pm
It’s not even sexuality that’s being taken away and commercialised. It’s not even seen as a sexuality, just slightly darker cheerleader porn in black leather.
The same way dykes aren’t actually sexual beings, but confused women who’ve momentarily forgotten where to find cock.
Like you said, it’s seen as scary. It can’t be acknowledged as sexuality. It’s either a perversion, or must be converted to a male-friendly misogynist fantasy to exist.
July 19, 2007 at 2:35 pm
“I am not beautiful enough to have a man submit to me. And that makes me ashamed of how fucking much I want it.”
Forgive me if I don’t make a lot of sense here. I just go off shift (48 hours) but I had to post while the poker was hot so to speak.
I have noticed in your other posts that you get hot thinking about a man submitting to you when he doesn’t really want to, or wants it/needs it so bad that he can’t help himself. I find it interesting that you are more focused on your shame than the man’s shame. For example, in your prostitute fantasy, you don’t talk about being ashamed that you need it so bad that you are willing to pay a large sum of money to get it. You focus on the man’s shame that he needs the money so bad that he is willing to do anything. You talk about findom and reveling in the man’s shame about giving away his money and wanking off about it. Why not revel in the man’s shame of needing and wanting to submit to a woman who is not every man’s dream? Sure, any man on the planet would be willing to submit to a leather clad evil goddess who commanded submission with a just a flip of her too tight pony tale. But he can wallow in the shame of knowing that he needs to be dominated so badly that he is willing and eager to submit to someone who is very real.
Is it possible that in your heart of hearts you believe “The lie that being desired is empowering”?
Or is this all because you just can’t find good porn?
July 19, 2007 at 2:51 pm
48hr shift huh? Surely you can see the attraction of the pro-domme world, being paid $400 for beating the crap out of some shmuck for an hour is a lot easier - I am guessing you are in the fire department.
July 19, 2007 at 3:24 pm
Brilliant post.
July 19, 2007 at 5:44 pm
Firefightrix
I really like your comment. I think it’s brilliant. I really like that fucked up desperation. In fact, sometimes I do find bits of my sexuality/rage about said sexuality completely contradict other bits. I have a second post about, um, I don’t know, force again, probably. You don’t have to be pretty for force.
I am a sucker though - I find it hard not believe pretty lies.
Let me get back to you in a more coherent kind of a way.
July 19, 2007 at 7:54 pm
The same way dykes aren’t actually sexual beings, but confused women who’ve momentarily forgotten where to find cock.
The cock is on top of the refrigerator.
Just about everything in my life that I have ever lost has been found on top of the fridge. Keys. Money. Sunglasses.
Oh, hell, it’s probably where I left my sanity. I must go check. I’m sure it’s next to the cock.
July 19, 2007 at 7:59 pm
Yes, I am a firefighter/paramedic and our shifts are normally only 24 hours, but I occasionally pull a double to get some extra cash.
Yes, I have thought about the pro-domme stuff. Even once seriously considered it. But, it seemed like a lot of work really
July 19, 2007 at 8:06 pm
Firefightertrix, speaking as someone that used to get paid ridiculous amounts of money for something that I consider adds little value to society I can only express admiration, but being male and uneducated my options were fairly limited. Jones thinks the prodommes marginalise her kink, at least women can make their money that way, options for straight men from the wrong side of the track are a little thinner! Still I am sure that there would be loads of men who would get off on being dominated by a firefighter!
July 19, 2007 at 9:19 pm
Is it their fault? They could stop it. They could say no [....] They could be honest and strong.
You could say the same about advertisers. Or soldiers. Or anyone else in any profession that had a dubious or distorting effect on the world. I guess this links back to your ‘male subs can save the world’ post a while ago - while you see the power as being in the hands of the fauxdoms, it’s maybe more in the hands of the morans who are willing to buy what they’re selling.
July 19, 2007 at 9:30 pm
But I *do* think that about advertisers and soldiers. And, quite often, about sadists.
I cut out a part about the men. About how just as women are judged by beauty in femdom, because of the prodom-everything, men are judged on richness. Their worth is their worth.
The best submissive men are the ones most able to tribute. Beautiful women and rich men - that’s who we want to be! That’s the aspiration. That’s the femdom poster couple!
And everyone knows that most rich men don’t get rich like that in nice ways. But, hey, they pay double the tribute and hand over a rollex so they are the best fucking submissive OMG.
What fucking year is this? Why is this what my sexuality is about? WTF is going on? Someone make it stop.
July 20, 2007 at 6:22 am
I’m sorry you cut that out. Would have made a nice extra point, I think. You are making me want to write about how I managed to fuck findom up its tight wad of green Jacksons, but I won’t sully your comments board with that.
July 20, 2007 at 6:32 am
It is so true. You have these women held up as the epitome of female dominance and then they squee over and aggrandise *wealth* in men as, like, the number one characteristic. It’s so fucked up.
I mean, seriously, what year is this?
July 20, 2007 at 3:29 pm
BJ,
As completely polarly opposite as we are (I’m not sure it would be possible to be much more different from one another and still both be dominant
) you’re exactly right. What we are gets packaged and sold in ways that are, well, nearly unrecognizable. And then clueless men ge ANGRY that we’re not that packaged thing.
When I was younger I actually daydreamed about being a pro dominatrix. I thought wow, it would be so fucking amazing to center my *life* around taking people on the kinds of journeys this stuff can take them on, all the time, and get *paid*
wowee! zowee!
Then it occurred to me just what I’d have to be doing, and I realized I’d be selling my soul. Ugh.
July 20, 2007 at 4:21 pm
Hooray! Nothing like oppression to unite polar opposites like us.
I really appreciate you dropping by and telling me so
BJ xx
July 20, 2007 at 7:58 pm
Loved the post, and while I don’t choose to play with men, I can completely put myself in your shoes, because even if I *did*, they wouldn’t see ME as a Domme - because I don’t fit the mold. and this is something I struggled with in the beginning … trying to fit myself into someone else’s mold - and I did for a little while, but it was so obvious that it wasn’t *me*, that no one else saw me that way anyway.
*hugs* if’n you want them, and know that (as your comments suggest), you’re not alone in this.
July 21, 2007 at 1:39 am
Hmm. I’m glad you qualified your attack on strap-ons with the “*you*” (those are 3 great websites, by the way), but the fact is a lot of those phony images that you complain about are not male-driven or a reflection of what submissive men want (even the “inauthentic” ones), it’s a reflection of what the market produces, which is efficient at getting sufficiently marketable product to potential consumers, but not perfect at replicating internal representations of desire.
The fact is, people will take the best they can get. I sincerely doubt most people who watch any kind of porn think it is perfect, but it is better than the reasonable alternatives within their reach. If you really went out there and asked sub males whether they preferred the plastic/synthetic images of dominant women that you hate or the more authentic, genuine variety of imagery (and one can tell, give us credit) — including the threatening obejectification of males — you’d find a silent majority preferring the latter, especialy being objectified and verbally degraded. But it’s a collective action problem. Who exactly is going to surmount the transactions costs to make femdom porn that actually transmits authentic femdom values when seeing a strap-on pump in and out is good enough. There is no Martin Luther King, Jr. of femdom porn out there to help us overcome.
Sure, it would be much better to see a woman who actually likes using a strap-on, and a male who actually is in subspace as the act occurs, shot from angles and in a context that communicates the right values, with genuine text about it written by a thoughtful woman and enjoyed by avid, introspective readers, but that interpretive community (unfortunately) doesn’t exist. You have to choose the second best. I mean, you can make an attempt, by, say, reading this blog…
Let me indulge in an anecdote or, rather, ask a rhetorical question. Anyone remember what femdom porn was like before all the Congressional acts in the 90s? Amateurish and real. You could go online and see blogs, pics, and video by actual female supremacists in Montana, or wherever, with their husbands in cages. They were ugly and unvarnished sometimes; other times they were very attractive and eloquent (I’m not being binary here, it’s just a point about diversity and production values). After the Congressional acts, you need to verify age and keep records and register with the state — there are start-up costs, which means you don’t get into the business unless you can afford to be heavily regulated. Now it’s all commercial. That isn’t the fault of men, really; certainly not sub men; it’s the fault of conventional morality and Congress, acting on behalf of “the children” and really just furthering commodification of everything. (Keep in mind this happened under President Clinton with a female attorney general.)
“I am not beautiful enough to have a man submit to me.”
Eh, whatever, that isn’t true, as the pre-90s Internet shows. The “beauty” is just a way of selling product. If your porn is identical to other porn save your women are conventionally hotter, you’re going to sell more of it than your competition. It has nothing to do with what actual sub men will accept (or truly desire); it has to do with men finding the best quality porn for as cheap as possible; that doesn’t mean, however, that they wouldn’t prefer authenticity — it’s just that it’s been banned by Congress. It’s not that one wouldn’t prefer cars that go 800 miles per gallon, it’s that they aren’t on the market, right? Which is the problem with turning everything into a market, but not an inherent problem with the desire matrices of submissive men.
July 21, 2007 at 8:16 am
Yes, wow - this is what I have always wanted to say. But you know, it is not just women who are made to feel pressurised about their appearances, even men are. I have seen guys who are quite insecure about the way they look; they rationalise their rejections and failures in bed to not being ‘good-looking’. It is also taken for granted that as a woman your reasons for liking someone or sleeping with someone is because you think they look good. I do agree that there is something like pure ‘physical’ chemistry, which has nothing to do with mental or emotional connect, and that does get defined by how the other person APPEARS to you. But for me, it is more about how you interpret their body, their body language and what their physical gestures, or the way they carry themselves around says about the way they think. I am unable to come to a conclusion about whether I would be physically attracted to someone or not the minute I see them, or on the basis of their looks. It just doesn’t turn me on. On the other hand this constant obsession for a certain kind of look, bothers me. I have been a victim of both extremes - when I was a child I was traumatised by being repeatedly called ugly at my face and now in my 20s, it annoys me more than surprises me that I am considered a good-looker. It bothers me that I have to be a victim to these uninvited judgments, I have not asked anyone for their opinion ever. On what basis am I considered a good-looker? Because I don’t want to fall into stale categories because of the way I look. It is quite sad really, how the pressure of outward appearance can screw up your sexuality and life.
July 21, 2007 at 6:45 pm
It’s possible to do the pro-Domme thing without selling your soul, without being anything but “you”, without selling out, without fitting the ideal perfectly. It’s difficult, it’s a hell of a lot of work, and you have to say no to a lot of money, but it IS possible.
I’m not the standard. I’m not the hotness. I’m not the right body type, I’m not a hooker, and I don’t do a lot of things that would make me very financially comfortable. But I love my kink, I love making it my living, and I love that I get paid to play.
Losing twenty kilos, buying more leather clothing and doing “erotic” sessions would probably help my business a lot. But then it would be about them, rather than me, and that’s not why I do what I do. I’m not trying to say that none of your problems with pro-dommes apply to me, as I’m sure some of it does. I’m just saying… some of us try.
*shrug*
July 21, 2007 at 7:07 pm
Would we have ever heard Bitchy’s unique and inspiring voice if those poor, pretty-little pro-domme girlies in their squeaky suits and clip-cloppy heels didn’t exist to get her so riled up? Male domming does suffer from similar stereotyping, and actually finding a way to express dom sexuality without sounding like a bad game of Dungeons and Dragons can be tricky for either sex. I am often surprised there aren’t more comments here from dom guys cheering you on.
In my mind, there is no sexier look than the distant eyes and slackening jaw of someone who is realising ‘control’ is as much an illusion as ‘beauty’.
July 22, 2007 at 8:47 am
People don’t even realise that beauty is an illusion / perception, sleep-talker. They think there is a formulae for it. And that everyone should strive towards that in order to be pretty.
July 23, 2007 at 12:29 am
Hi! I just found your blog, and all I can think is “SO MUCH AWSUM!” Seriously, you rule.
I’m sort of a switch (it’s complicated and nonstandard, but I hope there’s room for people like me), and yeah, the Bondage Barbie thing sucks. I probably do have the right body type, but the whole persona makes me uncomfortable. I don’t want to worry about whether I look nice and feminine when having sex; I just want to have sex. Anyway, why should all female dommes have a conventionally femme appearance? Or all female subs? Fuck that noise. Even for people who are vaguely good-looking, that stuff is suffocating.
July 24, 2007 at 3:27 am
BJ
No problem, and I appreciated the “I’m not talking about you” comment too.
I think it just goes to show that no matter what any of us do, we’ll never really fit that femdom stereotype. And there will always be guys who reject or resent us for that and that’s truly fucked up.
hexy:
Yeah, I realize that not all pro dominatrices sell their souls.
I just highly doubt that if I did that, I’d make much green, seeing as:
1) I’d be totally uncomfortable topping someone behind his partner’s back. For me being dominant is about shaping someone in positive ways — and offering positive reinforcement for cheating is not the kind of behavior molding I’m at all comfy doing. So anyone who came to me would have to be single or have his partner’s permission. But as soon as I said this, many would lie. So there’s that.
2) I’m far too butch for most of the “femdom” crowd. I couldn’t tell you how often I get begged to wear a corset — or even a skirt.
July 25, 2007 at 11:15 am
Hi Bitchy,
A very powerfully written point of view that I don’t want to challenge. I’ve been married three times (at last, happily) and am very familiar with a woman’s insecurities about appearance and how that insecurity is constantly reinforced by advertising.
As a man well aware of my submissive nature, I just want to suggest that for those of us who really need to be dominated it’s the power our partners have over us that truly seduces.
Much of what I see on the Net is just fluff and doesn’t really impact me. I may be one of those few males more driven by words than images, at least those that are spoon fed to me, rather than the ones I see in my dark places.
Wishing you well,
scott
Mrs. Kelly’s Playhouse
July 25, 2007 at 11:32 am
Thank you
I am such a sucker for submissive men saying stuff like that.
Oh, I do love me submissive men. Oh, a lot.
July 26, 2007 at 7:38 am
Bitchy, you wrote,
“Dominant sexuality is active – not passive.
*Wanting* not being wanted.”
However, being desired is powerful, too.
How powerful do you feel when you want a sub and he says, “No” ?
July 26, 2007 at 9:10 am
Deb,
You still feel powerful when a sub says no. Power is not in the yes, necessarily. The point Bitchy is making is in that of having desire. You feel powerless only if you would be waiting for a sub/domme to come and ask you, and you’d be wondering whether to say yes or no.
July 26, 2007 at 9:31 am
If he says no, that can be hot. Depends on the type of no.
No! You’re not a PVC clad sneer-face - Ow!
No, please…, please don’t do that - Er, well…
July 26, 2007 at 11:12 am
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, I vote for the second no.
July 26, 2007 at 3:41 pm
“waiting for a sub/domme to come and ask you, and you’d be wondering whether to say yes or no.”
Oh jeez I wasn’t thinking of that, I was thinking of desire.
“NO I don’t want to do that (for any number of reasons)” - can be fun.
“NO you don’t excite me, I don’t want you” (from HIM) bleeeeeeeeah.
THAT’S the
July 26, 2007 at 3:42 pm
ops missed the finale: THAT’S the NO I was thinking of.
July 26, 2007 at 4:31 pm
But if it is that sort of no (”you don’t excite me”), then it’s a different issue. It is not ‘you’ that he is saying no to, it is your ‘preferences’ he is saying no to. So that doesn’t hurt. Your preferences are being rejected, not you. Unless the only purpose of having sex for you is to please the other person and ignore your own orgasm. Of course, that is a very important state of mind in sex (the orgasm as a product of the other’s), but you have to balance it somewhere, you see. If you do not excite someone who in turn excites you, then there is a problem in the chemistry somewhere. Either he is not capable of being turned on by someone else’s orgasm, or he doesn’t get turned on by you being turned on particularly, or that you are trying to win him over by giving him sex (the last option is most unhealthy).
Rejection has to be defined better if you do not want it to damage you. Find out whether you are being rejected as a person (this in my opinion would happen if it were an actual relationship and not in a D/S one-night stand / no-strings sex affair), or whether your sexual preferences are being rejected.
And the ‘no’ lives at so many levels, like Bitchy put it. At the masochistic level, at the abstinence level, and at the rejection level. The first two nos are nice nos.
August 1, 2007 at 3:23 am
…and the funny part is that all this sexualization of absolutely everything of late has coerced me by degrees into redefining myself as ‘a dom’. in fact I’m just a man. I don’t feel any different. but suddenly I’ve got to out to a novelty store and buy a fucking BDSM decoder ring and a single tail to prove it. gee, is dominating women new to me? hardly. i started with my mother, moved onto my sisters, then serially dominated every women i came into contact with thereafter. this isn’t ‘kinky’, it’s not ‘perverted’. it’s normal. my brother did it. my dad did it. his dad did it. there’s an upside though: after blowing three marriages for being selfish and cruel and only caring about my own pleasure, I’m suddenly in demand by a whole generation of young, beautiful women who seem to want to experience men like me, or something like it. none of them seem entirely sure exactly what they’re supposed to want to experience.
i agree with you though. we’ll all been turned into sex machines by a bunch of slick marketing mavens on madison avenue and elsewhere for the sake of profit. but there’s another upside: it’s been somewhat freeing for women of size etc., and its gratifying to see non-runway models out there mixing it up and getting their needs met. maybe even being more appreciated for their inherent qualities, however they define them. men don’t really pay any attention to the lipgloss and fetish wear in the magazines and on prodomme websites. it’s only marketing after all.
August 8, 2007 at 12:39 am
I’m a Pro Domme and have been thinking about the feminist aspect of the biz. The way I’ve come to look at it is that it’s probably one of the only ways in which a woman can use men’s attraction to her to survive (thrive, even) without having to actually sexually service him. It’s a sort of middle ground between having to go out there and make less money for the same job and housewifery/total financial dependence on a husband.
Maybe the domination aspect is but a thin veneer painted over the same old rusted patriarchal mess, but it makes all the difference in the woman’s experience (and pocket).
And as far as the beauty thing goes… I suspect it’s a damned if you are, damned if you aren’t deal.
August 8, 2007 at 12:31 pm
There is nothing particularly feminist about sexually dominating a man. It is no more feminist that any other sex act. I don’t dominate men *because* I am a feminist. And I know a lot of feminists who are submissives. They think the same things about equality that I do.
As for prodom itself, it still makes the fulfillment of female sexual desire secondary to the fulfillment of male sexual desire. I can’t see how satisfying a man’s kinks for money is a feminist act. No matter what part of your body you’re using to do it.
Prodom isn’t more feminist or less feminist than any other kind of sex work.
August 8, 2007 at 5:38 pm
We’ll probably just have to agree to disagree, BJ, but as someone who has worked in other areas of the sex industry, I assure you, being a Pro Domme is a lot more female-friendly than other sex work. I made more money swinging around a pole, but I am a Domme for the increased sense of empowerment.
I don’t think that feminism is going to bring about equality. EVER. We’re smaller and the half of the population that gets the shitty end of the reproductive stick, and men are never going to let up on that. Theory is all well and good, but I am more interested in feminism in the practical sense: so if I can twist the patriarchy back on itself and place the fallout in my bank account, that’s all the revolution I need. And it’s all the revolution any of us is going to get.
August 8, 2007 at 6:01 pm
So your message is what? There’s no point in hoping for a world in which people are equal so let’s just make some goddamn money?
Hooray for consumerism! And individualism! And capitalism!
I want a better world. And you aren’t the first person to tell me not to bother ’cause it’s never going to happen.
I don’t listen to that stuff. That’s the most toxic message of all.
August 30, 2007 at 12:58 am
I think you people are intelligent and making some good points that I have considered myself.
I empathize with it, I can understand. I’m in the same place as you. Im a real sub, I know this is a sexuality. I dont get fantasy and reality mixed up, Im intelligent, I want to get to know a Domme for who she is and justify my sexuality as part of a loving relationship. My whole goddam town knows Im a sub and no-one gives a F***!. (However upon looking at the “scene” I almost feel embarrased and hope it doesnt give the wrong impression).
Heres some photos of me, to see what I look like. http://s191.photobucket.com/albums/z264/Cuffy_The_Vampire_Spanker/
I am on the 1st 3 photos, while the rest are Femdom in adertizing campaigns (apart from the one with the woman on the sofa) so perhaps theres a kind of more positive representation of Femdom for you? in that its not sordid but stylish and well presented in adverts, rare stuff there perhaps.
No Domme yet but still working on it, my freind in the scene tells me its better to find a partner outside the scene how lame but there you go.
best wishes,
x
August 30, 2007 at 1:04 am
Shit, I shed a tear then, couldnt help it.
At least I give a better impression of this sexuality to the outside world, my Boss knows, my family, my freinds, bunch of girls, bare knuckle fist fighter etc etc………
December 12, 2007 at 6:35 pm
Hello,
This is my first visit to your blog…
Looking around, I was suprised, then amused at this passage:
“There was this dom woman in the full domme-drag: black shiny catsuit, tight pony tail and lovely I-can’t-smile-or-my-clown-make-up-will-crack face.
And she had a strap on. Not even a nice one. One that looked like a big vile veiny cock. (And I *like* *cock* - but, you know, a real man’s cock is a genuine special miracle the way it can be so fucking ugly and so damn beautiful at the same time. Make the same thing out of plastic and it just doesn’t work.) It looked like something from a joke shop.
And she was doing a stage show with her slave - all sexay.
And her slave was a woman, naturally. Because only women are interesting to look at sexually. Jesus. Hello, is that the speaking clock, yes could I check what year it is?
[...]
In the show, she bends her over and makes like fucky-fuck, except she’s really clearly, just pushing it between slavo’s legs and they’re both making big O-mouth faces like it’s so motherfucking horny that beautiful Mistress is making slave-girl bend over before the almighty power of (veiny plastic) COCK….
(See, now, when I complain about strap-ons, it’s not *you* - it’s stuff like this.)
[...]
Give it back! Give it back! Give my sexuality back!
Stop, stop! You’re getting it all dirty! You’re breaking it! You’re ruining it! Give it back! It’s mine!
Please, please. Just give it back! …”
I don’t quite understand how you can let a 5 minute-long fetish fashion show get you so angry and upset, and even rob you of your sexuality.
Or maybe this blog entry is the kinky version of thee current debate over skinny models in (vanilla) fashion shows…
I’m not sure it’ll help you, but here’s the full info: that specific scene you’re mentioning was a 5-minute fetish fashion show which took place in Paris in December 2005. And of course, nearly all ‘action’ was pretend, because there’s not much you can do when you have the stage for 5 minutes, and share it with other people; and the action is just to support the showing of the clothes, like in any other fashion show.
I know what happened during the show, because I was there, on the stage, too. I was the rubber-clad woman tying up an equally rubber-clad male submissive into a japanese-style rope suspension, right behind the offensive dominatrix with the ugly strap-on (and yes, the suspension was done and over in those darn 5 minutes, too).
Maybe you’ll be more lucky with the examples you choose in the future…
Shadow
December 12, 2007 at 6:43 pm
I think that that delightful interlude is a perfect example of exactly the kind of default imagery I am talking about.
Congratulations on your career in the show business
December 13, 2007 at 5:33 pm
It’s what the vast majority of the public pays to see, and wants to see… so that’s what they get. I don’t call ‘default imagery’ what is preferred and asked. I, for one, know that offering a non-default option can still be met with the remark ‘Sure, we know you can do *that*, but we’d rather have you do *this*.
But anyway, we all need beliefs, don’t we.
Shadow, who doesn’t have a ‘career’ in the show business, but ties up men and women in public because she likes it and because people keep asking her (hummmm… this sounds very familiar, but I won’t go there… ;-D)
December 16, 2007 at 5:05 pm
Thank you for this and the rest of your extensive blog. I have given up pretending or trying to be a sub, because I cannot submit mentally to someone who cannot even move around freely enough to whip me because of the high heels she is wearing. Who is she wearing the heels for? me? no not me, I would prefer a pair of trainers. Trainers are practical and thus empowering and thus sexier.
The so called dress code in the clubs does not help either, imposing a vanilla world expectation of Domme dress and style.
proccie
January 31, 2008 at 3:38 pm
Best not answer that question by the way, sympathy goes only so far until the ramifications of self-rightiousness affect others.
95%
January 31, 2008 at 3:56 pm
Yeah, um, okay, but please bear in mind that submissive men are exactly as responsible for general inequalities as other men. (How much you think that is is up to you.) Not more or less. Being a sexually dominant woman or a submissive man is just a sexuality. It doesn’t make you a more or less liberal person.
The rebuttal here *isn’t* that prodoms aren’t liberating women because they are punishing the wrong men (these poor innocent submissives) - just that dominating men for money isn’t doing anything that empowers anyone particularly at all. It’s a mutually beneficial arrangement - it is not a political act.
January 31, 2008 at 7:30 pm
“Yeah, um, okay, but please bear in mind that submissive men are exactly as responsible for general inequalities as other men”
I know, it would be silly for me to imply that any one group are totally clean and shiny.
I was just saying that according some of the Pro Dommes on this thread they come across as holding subs as more responsible for the inequalities a bit like they are a kind of social dustbin to these kind of Pro’s. I think I was just trying to point out the irony of this seeing as the whole F/m deal is often said to be due to the sort of social mores of this kind originally anyway.
A bit like a man f***ing a woman up the a** while the woman f***’s a male sub up the ass with a strap-on in a kind of cultural puppet 3 some.
As for it not being a political act I understand that in a sense that its just Dominating men for money if looking at it void of detail other than the business principals.
I was talking more about the perspective of the Pros on here who seem to take the job up for political reasons such as where they talk about becoming a Pro because of the patriarchy they percieve.
I sometimes think its a sort of self fulfilling prophecy in which many sit at whatever point according to how they feel about it as a passengar.
March 28, 2008 at 6:18 pm
Bitchy, you need to get out more. “Professional” dominant women are all airbrushed, pvc Barbie dolls because that’s all they have to offer a clientele of shallow men, cheating on their wives.
MOST real people I’ve met who are into BDSM look like they’re heading for a Whitesnake reunion concert or work in accounting . . . or both. The biggest surprise for me at the few LARGE bdsm events I’ve attended is how painfully plain all the people look, and, how the most creative, devious, and experienced tops always got the most attention, regardless of how far removed their appearance was from what you see on leathertits.com.
John Preston, who wrote Mr. Benson, among other gay leather smut-novels, once commented that the most notorious gay tops didn’t have to be pretty because their experience and abilities were so unique, and their personalities were so powerful. However, wannabe subs with little or no experience were often of value ONLY if they were attractive.
Leave a Reply