I’m not in any kind of scene. I don’t go out a lot. I like to write my blog and think my thinks. I’m not even very active online. I’m not a big participator in forums or anything. I’m no one really. Not part of any gang. Never really found one that did it for me.
I went to a thing last week and there were a whole group of sex! positive! type people all talking about the fetish scene as if it were some kind of social thing. None of them were kinky in the kind of deep down my-vanilla-she-is-broken type way I am, but they all knew more about this ‘fetish scene’ than I did.
I felt kind of crappy and inadequate. Pan laughs about the times we have tried to go out to fetish niteclubs. Always my idea – I get excited if I find one without a dress code. He gets dragged along. I take one step inside and feel immediately how much I don’t belong. He’s there, dancing, drinking, talking to weird looking people. Fitting in.
I’m in a corner, lost, getting mistaken for a femsub, or Pan’s kink facilitating girlfriend, or a misdirected tourist. No one ever asks me to the after party/the VIP area/the secret society. Ever. I’m really no good.
Sometimes I feel like a I have a talent for not belonging. Maybe that is why I have decided to forge my own grumpy vulnerable dom-woman sexuality of one. No you can’t come in, fuck off.
I can pretty much feel out of place most anywhere. I could feel out of place in my own bed if I tried.
Which is why it is all rather weird that I had to go to town last week to be filmed for a documentary about female sex bloggers.
I am token pervert. So I had to say what BDSM stood for. I may have fucked it up. Oh god, who died and crowned me queen of the dominoes? I can’t even trot off the BDSM thing with a smug face. You remember the part where I failed basic. I think I just lost my provisional license too.
I think I forgot discipline. (Insert your own joke, clever boy)
Anyway, after I had been “filmed” for “the” “television”. I thought, god, I really ought to be more “real”.
So I went to Coffee, Cake and Kink.
CCK was not there when I made my last and laughable attempts at being part of a scene. It is newish. And I think says it is the only kinky café in the universe. Or something. Anyway it seemed like a good idea.
And they do tea.
They also do cake.
And making Bitchy cry.
Sitting downstairs in CCK I began to feel sad. Disappointed, I guess. Daunted. Because I saw how big my self-appointed task is. And I saw that it is impossible. There I sat wondering who ever said I could spin straw into gold. Hoping that Rumplestiltskin might turn up and sort this mess out for me.
It’s impossible isn’t it? You go somewhere modern and cool like CCK. Somewhere that is proud as punch about its recycling and fair-tradey-ness, and find it just as fucked up as every-fucking-where else.
Downstairs in CCK there were five women, two men and me. On the walls was a fetish art exhibition. CCK is also a gallery space. I like art. Most fetish art is shit, but this was rather good. Black and white inky sparse things. Kind of Beardsleyish.
Here is what they are of. A woman in a basque – this picture is called Mistress. That’s good – no one’s going to be mistaking it for a picture of me, then. Seeing as how I am not some arbitrary self-elected ‘mistress’. See my bank account for proof. I spend all my money on submissive men – paying for it gives me a rush like a gambling addict on a losing streak.
Next picture is of a woman’s arse. She is wearing stockings. Next is a woman tied up. Woman’s arse getting whipped. Another woman in lingerie. Another woman tied up.
There are also some big paintings. I think these are by a different artist. They are not as good. One is of a woman’s arse. She is wearing a corset and has no head. One is of a blindfolded woman. One is of a woman looking all moody. Grrr. Perhaps she has her period.
I decided to root around and see if I could find any evidence that CCK know that women experience sexual desire. That women can be viewers as well as viewed. Bite me, I’m radical.
Next to me was a very prettily lit cabinet. It contained four books with women on the covers. 2 DVDs of Preaching to the Peverted with an actress done up as a dominasty on the cover. She’s the main character. Guess what kind of dominant woman she is? Go on, guess.
Also there are 2 different ultra lame looking kink soft-pornos with women on the covers. One is called London Fetish Girls. Like the moody woman in the painting the 3 women pictured are also clearly all on their period. And, from how red and sticky their mouths look, are suffering from terrible cravings for jam.
On the floor of CCK are folders of pictures to buy as prints. In amongst thirty or so of women I find one man.
And much later, I find a line drawing of a bound man hidden behind the door. Really. Hidden. Like you needed to have directions to see it in case a het man got his sexuality broken by looking at another man tied up and his cock twitched. God, it’s such a shame that that happening would make the world end, isn’t it?
So… The fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fucking male gaze. Thing is, I know you can say, well male gaze is everywhere, deary, that’s the way of the world. This is true. But really, I don’t care so much about the rest of the world, partly because I am a sexual nimby, but also, I thought when it came to reactionary ideas about gender a kinky modern enlightened café might be, oh, slightly better than the rest of the world.
Just this crazy whacked out thought I had.
Once, while making an argument like this (albeit less coherently – if that is even possible) I was told off for being homophobic. Because I forgot to say that some women are bisexual. But look, if you will just allow me to live in heteronomativity land just for this argument that will benefit everyone.
Please trust me when I say I don’t hate gay and bisexual women. I just don’t fuck them anymore ’cause I got myself hooked on cock and stubble. And seriously, if that’s the only argument you have against me – women like to look at other women too, so it’s all okay – you know I’ve won.
I’m sad to say all this really, because I know CCK are a good place run by good people. But even their loyalty cards have a picture of a tied up woman on them.
So I write this in a loving way, in the hope that my harsh scathe will help them grow and be better. It’s a lot like the tricks my parents used on me.
Oh, I’ve just remembered how they don’t work. Those methods raised an ungrateful, confused pervert prone to tantrums if she doesn’t get her own way. Watch:
It isn’t fair that everything is this shit. I never wanted to work this hard. I never wanted to do this on my own. Fuck this shit. Fuck, fuck, fuck. And fuck you most of all you people who I know ought to be doing better.
So I was all enraged sitting in CCK and then Jack arrived. And everything got a whole lot better.
To be continued.


41 Comments
July 29, 2007 at 11:24 pm
I’m curious about the to be continued!
Funny thing, I know the girl you linked via the ‘queen of the dominas’ comment. God, it’s a small world.
Also, I *am* bisexual, and I still get pissed off over the kind of imagery I’m presented with. I went to an art exhibition with May and Calico recently, and you could have been quoting verbatim from our conversation.
So. Many. Tied. Up. Women.
I don’t want it thrown out (tied up women, to me, are hot) but some balance? Maybe? A little?
July 29, 2007 at 11:30 pm
You should tell her I kick ass at dominoes.
Double six – bwahahahaha!
July 30, 2007 at 12:28 am
We also filmed in Amora – http://www.amoralondon.com – for the documentary and when we were in the “Fetish/BDSM” room, I flipped out, for exactly the same reasons you stated in CCK. There was one picture of a man on the wall – ONE!!! – amongst scores of photos of women in various forms of dress/undress. I’m all for a bit of ogling of the female form, but for fuck’s sake, where’s the parallel male objectification? Where is my desire/fantasy represented? Why is it that the male form has to be hidden away???
It gets me fucking furious, it really does. For all our ’sex positivity’ and our supposed ’sexual liberation’ and we still don’t have equality in our wank material. Something has to fucking change – and soon.
Or… I don’t know, I may HURT someone.
Grr.
July 30, 2007 at 12:56 am
“I’m not in any kind of scene. I don’t go out a lot. I like to write my blog and think my thinks. I’m not even very active online. I’m not a big participator in forums or anything. I’m no one really. Not part of any gang. Never really found one that did it for me.”
Geez, that’s me all over. Mostly because I can’t stand the way most doms talk about men. Or themselves. Or other doms. Sucky kiss-my-ass-you-underling attitudes. “Domly dom” attitudes. What happened to being a real person?
Anyway, I don’t tend to go out a lot either. Maybe twice a year. And this summer has been a riot of unusual-for-me outings. It’s been going well but I’ve also found a handful of people I can relate to rather than feeling like some sort of “I’m dominant but can’t relate to them” wallflower.
July 30, 2007 at 1:02 am
Sigh.
I’m doing my part. I don’t serve cake or tea, but I’ve got a pancake recipe……
Enough of that:
Filmed for television! Cliffhanger with a mysterious Jack!
Tres excitement.
Now bring the men, yes?
hugs, E
July 30, 2007 at 1:16 am
Oddly enough, first time I went to CCK the basement walls were covered in naked men. Things come and go. I really like the painting of the red-cloaked woman in the field of lilies that was there last time I dropped in (which was about a week ago) – partly because she actually made me think about what she, and I, were doing there.
Getting wank material equality is, I figure, eventually going to be down to the market. Ann Summers makes a fortune from vanilla women – mostly in the same lame way the rest of the fashion world does, but there’s this niche opening in objectifying men there and I’d expect it to widen. With the proviso that people can be out of touch with the pretence that the objectification of men is art.
Til then, at least we’ve got cricket
-and you were being a fandom again at the London munch on Friday evening. Perhaps if people keep talking about you with complete strangers in public, your quest will be not in vain.
July 30, 2007 at 1:26 am
I just had a look at the ‘other exhibitions’ section of the website, and three of the twelve galleries had much manflesh, though two of those were described as ‘gay’ and the third had a male creator (Guy Burch, looks good, but.) :/
July 30, 2007 at 4:24 am
Oh, oh, nooo. Why did someone drag you onto Max Fisch? My worlds are colliding, and it really hurts my head.
Some things are not compatible. My real world (which includes following your blog), and the little slice of sexwork fantasy that is maxfisch, ought never to cross paths.
Off to jump into yet another useless argument.
July 30, 2007 at 5:37 am
Looks like we both got a little upset in spaces with too many pictures of women tied up this weekend.
This post makes me want to write about my Friday&hellip
July 30, 2007 at 5:38 am
Err, that should have been:
July 30, 2007 at 5:39 am
Getting wank material equality is, I figure, eventually going to be down to the market
I don’t believe in the great god free market eventually giving people what they want. Take a look around you to see how well that’s working out. Places like CCK need to push. This is how things change. The free market is a dinosaur. A dinosaur and a god – I love a metaphor mash up.
But not as much as I love Bitchy Jones fandom!
July 30, 2007 at 5:44 am
Looks like we both got a little upset in spaces with too many pictures of women tied up this weekend.
I never go out – you know this. I make one little foray and look what happens. For serious, the fetish leisure industry should have a tied-up women hiatus. One month without tied up women.
Oh dear, would that be harsh on you poor babies who like tied up women and get oppressed every-other-damn-where? Welcome to being me, arseholes.
July 30, 2007 at 1:40 pm
* hug *
Someday it will all be better, promise!
* hug *
July 30, 2007 at 1:51 pm
ps.: as an aside, and risking an offtopic discussion, there is a difference between a ‘free market’ and ‘capitalism’…
Free Market: That condition of society in which all economic transactions result from voluntary choice without coercion.
Capitalism: That organization of society, incorporating elements of tax, usury, landlordism, and tariff, which thus denies the Free Market while pretending to exemplify it.
July 30, 2007 at 2:02 pm
If you visit a business you’ll find a business… a submissive organisation on a slutty quest for a state of continuous cash enema… this little flaw in its character should welcome your comments but it will also be the reason it will always let you down eventually.
Isn’t there an issue here that any business that gets kink ‘right’ is more in danger of destroying it, taking it off the kinky, than all the superficial attempts that ultimately leave the real kink where it needs to be: in the imaginations of the kinky?
It’s not a t-shirt slogan but am I making sense?
July 30, 2007 at 3:02 pm
Being a little far from CCK,I gave a look to its homepage,mainly the postcard session: two pics of men,one alone and tied up to the wall,the other one showing some kind of male orgy,which makes me think perhaps those two pics weren’t directed at women,but at kinky gay men.
The women postcards: some doms looked zebras,some yellow zebras,some yellow-faery-cat-zebras, one was posing as if she was a sub ( hands behind her back,looking down,though,hélas, carrying a whip),others were subs,one looked like an Ultraviolet-ish sub and most of them were tied up.
There was one single pic of a man and a woman: the bloke was a dom,the woman was tied up.Her body,taking her face,was visible. We could only look at part of the dom’s torso and leg. He had a hat covering his face.
If this was only the e-cards’s session,I can imagine your ( ours) frustration.
July 30, 2007 at 3:11 pm
You’ve put into words the whole thing about objectification. This is where the problem is. Most feminists keep complaining about female objectification and some arguments have been that “men are also objectified. What about the objectification of men? So what is the big deal?” Nobody realises that but the problem is not in objectifying the body, per se – the problem is in the equation that women are always objects *for men*, and like you say, men are the recievers of this object, when in effect it should be both ways. If it was ’someone’ being objectified, regardless of their gender, it would be different. But it is taken for granted that men recieve from, women give to. Great post. I also relate STRONGLY to the part about not fitting in and not belonging.
July 30, 2007 at 3:14 pm
Give it a rest Jones! Actually, since you mentioned your parents, you may have heard “As long as I pay the electricity bills/tv licence, I’ll decide what we watch” back in the 70’s. Well that attitude still exists and as you have pointed out in the past, femdom is mostly paid for by men – so why shouldn’t they get what they want? Have you ever considered that maybe the male subs are doing this on purpose, in order to enrage you, thus making their suffering even worse, when you finally get to beat them.
July 30, 2007 at 3:19 pm
It had taken me a while to understand the problem behind female objectification, too. I remember thinking when I was naiver, that ‘men also suffer in their own ways’, why do we have to have feminism. But while I was right that men do suffer in their own ways because of gender, it is a derived suffering… the pressure to always be the ones chasing, the pressure to not be submissive, the pressure to only think of sex.
July 30, 2007 at 4:27 pm
I don’t believe in the omnibenevolent free market either, but I do think that ‘hey, let’s have some tied up men, it’ll make the world a fairer and more representative place!’ won’t achieve results as fast as ‘hey, let’s have some tied-up men, you’ll get big piles of money!’ will…and in small niches (those awful Ann Summers calendars – CCK also had pretty naked men calendars last autumn) already is. Spending money will never change the world, but it might change the shape of the marketplace, if that’s the objective.
…which is a big ‘if’, really. I don’t like the way ’scenes’ are synonymous with industries; I terminally hate the commercial lesbian/gay scene (mm, it’s called just that because bisexuals clearly don’t have enough money), so why I’m expecting Bitchy to redeem the kink scene, I have no idea.
July 30, 2007 at 6:32 pm
Great post, Bitchy. Thank you so much for drawing attention to the problem which we have been facing from Day 1 – the truth is, there just aren’t enough male nudes around.
You said “places like CCK need to push” and that is what we have been doing. Over three years, we have put a “male art wanted” call to dozens of artists. We have made it known that good male art needs to be promoted and can jump (a long) exhibition queue. We have spoken to dozens of publishers specifically requesting “through the woman’s eyes” stuff. We are gutted to see (as your post proves) that all this work and all our effort has been slow to pay off so far.
And yet, there is hope. We have made “There Must Be Men” a condition of the current show and indeed, this inspired Dorian to draw one of his first ever male nudes (it’s proudly shown off by the stairs so that nobody can miss it and it also featured on our Loyalty Card). We have hopefully hunted down and/or facilitated a few good books (can recommend “Male Bondage”!). We also held what we were told was the “first SM gay exhibition in London in 20 years” (and risked our neck and very existence for that).
The trouble with “pushing”, and with change, is that it takes time.
As for women tied up, we are here to express all kinks, which includes women (and men) tied up. As Thene observed, things come and go. Just browse through our past exhibitions to see Lindsay McDermid’s or Matthew Slade’s digital art, Sheryl Lee’s stocking and heels or Julie Cook’s strong women (there were even watersports pics in the toilet once). We welcome any ideas how to make this variety more prominent to people who happen to come when a particular show is on.
We will carry on pushing, you carry on bitching (as the women and a transgender person behind CCK are).
July 30, 2007 at 6:42 pm
The guy behind the stairs needs to move. He is in the worst spot. Put him in the centre of the wall on the right.
Put a man on your loyalty card *instead* of a tied up woman. Not as well. *Push* .
Keep the men from previous exhibitions up longer to keep the balance. Have all male art in the toilet.
Have a male only month. And it that means bare walls – say why.
Come on! This could be exciting.
July 30, 2007 at 7:00 pm
Um, also, I just asked Jack about the loyalty card he took away:
“The card has a blond woman in a corset on the front, and a brunette in a frock on the back. They both have those boots that you don’t like on.”
Um… did we get the wrong one?
July 30, 2007 at 7:01 pm
Off topic (except to say, again, how much I agree with you) but I just had to comment on the delicious picture of David Boreanaz in chains, that you’ve put up on your sidebar.
Goddamnit, that image is going to keep me occupied for hours. And hours. And hours…
July 30, 2007 at 7:05 pm
I know. I’m trying to make my own male objectification website.
July 30, 2007 at 7:48 pm
If you want any contributions to the male objectification website, I know a guy who posts videos/pics of himself performing auto-fellatio: I highly recommend you peruse his footage: I’ve never liked the “money shot” – until I saw this guy spunk all over his own face…
July 30, 2007 at 7:53 pm
Mmm. Sounds lovely.
I have heard it is not that tricky to get a guy to come over his own face if you raise his ankles with some kind of pulley.
Not that I can be bothered with that. I prefer the more basic method. Suck his cock and then spit it in his face.
July 30, 2007 at 8:27 pm
Akasha once wrote some lovely fiction about making a man spray on his own face by tying his hands to a beds headboard, then ropes around the ankles, ropes around the headboard, then pulling those ropes(using some leverage to really make him have to stretch) so that his crotch was above his face, and then playing with the exposed ass and precariously positioned cock.
God I used to love reading Akasha’s stuff.
July 30, 2007 at 8:31 pm
I think that Akasha story was what I was thinking of. Ah, Akasha, those were the days. She was quite important to me, actually.
Whatever happened to her?
July 30, 2007 at 8:35 pm
I think that all of her material is pay only now. She still runs a mass slave drive every so often where dozens of men perform little tasks for her and then write her about it, or leave voice messages. I think she publishes the best of the best and whittles them down over time until only a few are left. No idea what the prize is. Americas next top slave, or something.
She also makes forum posts at a kink dating site that I occasionally visit “www.collarme.com”.
At least, I think it’s her.
July 30, 2007 at 8:43 pm
It’s a shame she is pay only. She was a really important voice.
Mind you – I’m pretty sure I downloaded almost all her stuff onto my old computer back in the dark days of dial up internets.
July 30, 2007 at 8:50 pm
Well, If she’s able to make fat sacks of cash from wonderful writing, then I’m all for it. Maybe she’ll publish something and become a little mainstream. I could totally go for the mainstream-ization of her brand of sexy.
That being said, with her dethroned, I’m casting my vote at your as premiere femdom writer on the internet. Congrats. You’ve won the Neccy
It’s pretty prestigious.
July 30, 2007 at 9:19 pm
Okay, usually I jump straight from the entry to the end of the comments, so I had to go back to find the David Boreanez picture. Dear god, that is hot.
Also, so much cliffhanging over all the shagging! I hope the next entry is juciy
.
I’m thinking about putting some of my paintings in the next erotic art show at OneTouch, should they have another one, and should they want massive paintings of tied-up men. If I do, I’ll let you know how it goes.
July 30, 2007 at 9:27 pm
I used to draw bondaged-up stick-men and then wank over them.
And I still cut men out of magazines and draw gags and stuff on them.
July 31, 2007 at 4:06 pm
Hi Bitchy — got here from SMFeminists, and have been reading through the archives. But I just had to comment on this:
“I still cut men out of magazines and draw gags and stuff on them.”
You should make collages out of them! Then you could scan them in to use as art for your posts! I’d love to see that, personally
July 31, 2007 at 4:12 pm
God. Maybe.
Maybe.
August 3, 2007 at 3:59 am
An argument I’ve heard defending the lack of male nakeditty in kinkdom is — wait for it — NAKED MEN ARE UNATTRACTIVE. “Nobody” likes looking at naked men. Cocks are silly-looking, and men are embarrassed about them. Cocks are threatening and men are too polite to show them. The sight of naked cocks traumatizes abused women. The sight of naked men is actively undesirable.
I don’t believe the people making this assertion are all afraid of feeling aroused at the sight — I’m generally unaroused by the sight of naked women, and I do believe that many men who dislike seeing other men naked aren’t aroused enough by them to be deep-down worried about that aspect of things. But pretty clearly the rationalizers (male and female) feel most at ease in a world where men look and women pose.
August 3, 2007 at 8:32 am
Oh yes, yes, yes naked men are unattractive, ugly, funny…
I can’t believe this argument perpetuates when it is so easy to disprove it.
If I were an abuse victim (which I’m not unless we start counting very tiny incidents) I imagine I would be as traumatised by sexualised naked women as naked men. I can’t help thinking ‘Oh noes, think of the abuse victims!’, might be a new spin on ‘Oh noes, think of the children!’
August 18, 2008 at 9:35 am
[...] London, including BDSM blogger Bitchy Jones, whose first impressions of the shop can be found at Little Wonder. Her laments for the café’s departure can be found [...]
March 11, 2009 at 9:37 pm
You’re not alone!
Let’s get some naked men pictures and sort this shit the fuck out.
(Yes, I’m serial commenting. I really am insanely glad to have found your blog).
July 30, 2009 at 9:51 am
[...] Little Wonder « Bitchy Jones’s Diary [...]