I want you to remember, when you read this, that I am not very attractive.
Jack said I was ‘not uncute, you know‘ but I think he was just trying to head off a whine-tasting-session before it started.
Look, I have short hair, so fuzzy and brittle that I can make stick straight up in the air without product. I have big thick spectacles. Freckles. I am fat. Over 200lbs. My BMI is 33.5. My arse is big. My tits are less so.
I am not an unearthly creature. There is no entrancing. If you saw me you would not be hypnotised. I am not even that kind of fat-girl-dom in a corset and stilettos and too much make up. I wear combat trousers a lot. I like pockets. And trainers. My top usually has something split down it. I don’t wear make up so much because I am lazy. I get mistaken for a dyke a lot.
So this is not the story of a woman so beautiful men are dazzled by her dazzleosity. This is not the story of a woman skilled at ropes and whips and electrification of penises. This is not the story of a woman who dresses in the dresses or struts the struts or fetish models (whatever that even *is*) or does it for money or goes to play parties or has ten trizilion kinky friends. This is not the average femdom fairy story. This is just a plain woman, with a too-high voice for serious commanding, often shy and with a sexuality that is at best *awkward*, making a space that works and getting it right this one time.
This a story about an ugly duckling getting to be a swan.
So maybe it is a kind of fairy story – but I wouldn’t hold out for the Disney adaptation.
First, Monday was Pan’s birthday. We had a fight. After, we were too drunk to fuck.
On Tuesday I was hung over. I wrote about Pan’s birthday the day before on my blog. Pan bought a white lab coat from army surplus.
On Wednesday Jack came to tea. Pan was in London visiting his sister.
Just before Jack was due to arrive one of my next door neighbours came and told me they had seen my cat limping in the street. I went out to look for cat but there was no sign. I called Pan in a panic. I told him to turn around and come home so he could care for cat. It started to rain. I was standing in the street looking for the cat when Jack arrived.
Jack was all, ‘Hey are you standing in the street waiting for me?‘ And also all, ‘Hey, here I am. I have arrived for perverted sex.‘
And I was all, ‘No. Perverted sex is cancelled. We must find lost injured cat ZOMGZ!’
We found the cat. (Sorry if that stressed you – I probably should have warned at the top for mild cat peril.) I called Pan and told him I thought the cat would be okay until morning and that he should not come home after all.
Then Jack cooked. I kissed him quite a lot – endangering cooking. We did some painful things too. (Painful for him.) Some naked things. (Naked for him.) Some kneeling things. (Kneeling… (oh, get with it.))
I don’t know if his tongue stud felt so very different on my cunt – but on my nipples it was incredible. Bliss of death.
Jack fucked me. Jack has a big cock. He likes me saying he has a big cock. Obviously, he has not read the submissive man’s handbook and does not know that this is entirely the wrong way around. (Another good thing about him.)
Jack also has a big bent nose. Earlier I told him that I love big noses. All women do. (Stop that naughty, naughty generalising right now, BJ.) I told him that it made women think he had a big cock. It is extra good when those expectations aren’t disappointed. Before he fucked me, Jack had not been allowed to come for four days. Inside me, he came on command. Hit the mark perfectly. He thought he wouldn’t be able to.
That was nice.
After first times, I often end up wishing I had done more. We still had an hour before the last train back to London. Jack made me dessert and while I ate it we talked about all the things we hadn’t done.
Jack said he wanted me to make him cry with shame.
That was nice.
I didn’t. Not at that point. I was eating dessert.
On Thursday Pan had a date. Except maybe not really a date. He took one of the most beautiful women I know out for a drink. And he asked her if she would have sex with him. I know I mostly write about Pan as if he is Mr Super-Sexy-Smart-Smooth and, you know, he is, except sometimes he is puppy-dog/nervous/bounce-bounce/shy.
He was so cute with his condoms and his fumbling and his blushing.
When he got home at 2am, he woke me up, fit to burst with pride.
He also took the cat to the vet. I say that for people (i.e. Gwen) who are only reading this for the cat-health-update. Cat is fine.
On Friday I took Jack’s orgasms away again via text message.
And later, me and Pan wanted to have sex but we didn’t have any condoms. We had a hilarious faux-fight about who had used up all the condoms dogging around.
God, we’re funny. There ought to be a play.
Then – ’cause we had no condoms so he couldn’t use his cock-cock – he fucked me with the strap on cock, kind of for the hell of it. And then I gave his strap on cock a blow job kind of for the fucking hell of it.
And he said that was the hottest thing he had ever seen and masturbated while I did it and then said he was going to have to update his book of off-beat sexual experiences.
Pervert.
On Saturday I watched TV (What? Are you trying to kill me?)
On Sunday I met Jack by Tower Bridge because we are just too cute not to try and kiss next to every London landmark we can think of. This is where I had the enormous cock conversation with him (Just a note for the BJ timeliners).
A lot of the time I was with him I was thinking about slapping him in the face. But I am not a character from your pornos and I do not slap people in public. I was also not wearing a fur coat – in case you are still confusing me with the stuff you pay to have exist.
Jack had been denied orgasm for 2 days at this point. (shut up – he’s new.) Orgasm denial is so best on people who don’t really expect it to be anything. Who go from, ‘oh, sure’ to ‘what the fuck have you done to me?‘
In about 12 hours.
At the moment, that’s the house that Jack built.
(Okay, I built it. He lives in it. I just wanted the line.)
Jack has to wear a suit without underwear and be at least 24 hours from his last shave. We were having lunch and when the bill came I paid ’cause I have ten million money kinks and Jack never pays ever. After that I went a little money-kink crazy whispering to Jack that I wanted to pay him for sex or some such dumb-dom talk. ‘I want to pay you,’ I think I said. All urgent-hitch-in-voice-crackly whisper. I wasn’t up to paragraphs. He was very gallant about it.
He said it was hot to think about that, but still told me no
Because Jack knows the difference between don’t come and don’t shave and don’t wear underwear and I want to pay you for sex.
And no is the difference. It’s not about limits. It’s about a line. Jack knows where my line is. Even when I don’t.
When I got home Pan dressed up in a white lab coat and a pair of safety goggles and a pair of latex gloves for sex.
I wonder where his line is.


43 Comments
August 27, 2007 at 8:14 pm
Jones, I just knew you were the kind of girl that had a cat! Sounds like an eventful week, I am sure I am wrong and that Jack really followed your orders, but you can’t expect us to believe that he didn’t have a lazy lob while waiting for satisfaction, (orgasm denial is one of those things that just seem stupid to me). As a good vanilla Catholic I can’t say I approve but it seems that Pan had the hot chick, you got the big cock and the pussy passed the medical so Vive le Difference!
August 27, 2007 at 8:23 pm
And as far as the money kink goes, that is just funny to me! I am someone who’s life has been defined by money, what I earned – what I could have earned etc. I wonder why you have issues about it, I should point out that even when I was earning stupid amounts, the girl I was with was substantially wealthier. Do you think you associate wealth with power and if so why?
August 27, 2007 at 8:46 pm
I guess. It’s a sort of masculinity trapping as well. I’ve never really examined it too closely though.
I have – really – no money. None. But that’s good thing. I’m like a compulsive gambler. You should never trust me with your money, Toni.
August 27, 2007 at 8:49 pm
My business is gambling Jones, after all what is life without a few risks?
August 27, 2007 at 8:54 pm
For the record, all you had to say to me was ponder out loud about heavy metal chains and shackles and I was beginning to get…um…images in my head. *awkwardshuffle*
August 27, 2007 at 9:15 pm
“I wonder where his line is.”
Why, when you said this, did I think of a line so far in the distance, that, even were it infinite in length, would still appear to be a dot?
August 27, 2007 at 11:10 pm
Thank you May. I do hit the target sometimes. Once or twice. Metal bondage is kind of an easy one for me.
Meanwhile, Pan’s line? I don’t know. I have already put in a request for a repeat of white coat/safety goggles/latex gloves (fuck! latex), so he can’t be held entirely to blame.
August 27, 2007 at 11:14 pm
Bitchy, love the being loved for the inner you and all that, but I think you are overemphasizing your unattractiveness in this post. I remember a week ago or so your saying “I like to dress cute.” Where does the truth lie? Sorry, I just have a good memory.
August 27, 2007 at 11:20 pm
Ah, you just have to humour me sometimes. Er, most times.
Well, I still kind of feel like the standard for me, because I am a dominant woman is something I can’t attain. I try and be okay with that but I am not so good with that sometimes.
I’ll take cute, though. I can do cute. I have that and I have come to terms with the part of me that wails, ‘But you’re not meant to be *cute*.’
August 27, 2007 at 11:25 pm
I will humor you!
But perhaps you have two things going on: 1) your desire to reclaim femdom and 2) that British self-deprecating thing. I imagine Hugh Grant is always saying he’s not cute, too.
August 27, 2007 at 11:32 pm
Those are my two key facets!
Thanks for the humouring. I practically need a whole team of people bolstering my ego and generally stroking me every day. I need an entourage.
August 27, 2007 at 11:37 pm
OK, I’m going to start being very loyal. Because this is my favorite blog.
August 28, 2007 at 12:04 am
It always seems to happen.So many people say they are fat when they are really only medium,stocky,plump or a strong build.But what makes you think being fat is a bad thing where beauty is concerned.I thought you were well up on the tyrany of dieting thing and why fat is a feminist issue.
August 28, 2007 at 12:08 am
On the strength of this post, Pan is winning the hotness contest (in my head) on points.
August 28, 2007 at 1:44 am
z, I disagree. I think Bitchy’s winning the hotness contest.
August 28, 2007 at 2:14 am
Obviously, he has not read the submissive man’s handbook and does not know that this is entirely the wrong way around.
Err… it’s you that has the big cock?
*looks up previous posts re: strap-ons*
*scratches head*
Er… umm… oh, never mind.
*sits in the back and just watches*
August 28, 2007 at 4:44 am
Bitchy, I like the way you write about not being attractive. Of course, I haven’t met you so I can’t say whether I think you’re attractive (meaning “tending to attract”) or not. But I know that, for me, a person has to be way out there for it to matter; if someone has qualities I value, I’ll love their body regardless.
And the fact that that’s true for me is the only way I can accept that my submissive loves to look at and touch me (current BMI: 39).
I know this post wasn’t primarily about your appearance, but that really grabbed me.
August 28, 2007 at 5:33 am
Combat trousers are sexy.
Trainers are sexy, but not as sexy as combat trousers.
Pockets are very sexy, especially the big ones on combat trousers that might have anything in them, and you have to guess what it is, and if you guess wrong she gets to use it on you.
Having your orgasms taken away is incredibly sexy.
Bitchy Jones is, despite her occassional protests to the contrary, sexy.
August 28, 2007 at 6:46 am
DAZZLEOSITY
You, Bitchy One, are beautiful!! That word alone was worth the whole post. The kinkiness was just a bonus.
August 28, 2007 at 8:15 am
Ack, see, now, I feel bad. I feel like I am now writing a blog purely to make people who don’t know me say I’m sexy.
I probably can’t say I’m sexy right this second. When Jack says I’m sexy, I say that I just like sex. Jack says that is the same thing.
But what I mean when I write about not being very attractive is that I am not one of these women. And when I was younger I didn’t know you could do the stuff I did last week unless you were.
August 28, 2007 at 8:19 am
Err… it’s you that has the big cock?
I’m not really sure how I confused you, Tom. I thought I was kind of clear on that issue. I like PIV far too much to have an extra P in the way. (Well, except for sometimes when Pan wears it for his own strange reasons)
Click the link in the comment above – you’ll enjoy it.
August 28, 2007 at 8:33 am
On Friday I took Jack’s orgasms away again via text message.
There has clearly been much hotness going on, but I liked this particularly.
I am also impressed by Pan’s pantheon of perversion. (And yours, of course.) And, aw, isn’t it great when your partner’s all “OMG I pulled!” & bouncy. Even if they have used up all the condoms.
Glad the cat is OK!
August 28, 2007 at 11:48 am
Bitchy, you’re on a roll: right now you’re redefining sexy for everybody, not just the kinky people.
August 28, 2007 at 12:13 pm
Yep, I agree with Maisy. Here in America we have a red neck comedian named Ron White who does a very funny bit called “You can’t fix stupid!” The point being everything else is just cosmetic. What makes a person sexy is what’s inside their head.
Intelligence and humor with a large (some might even say ENORMOUS) part kink defines sexy for me.
I watched 1:57 of that video and I was bored to tears. I would venture to say not one of those models has ever truly done any topping…not that perviness can’t come in an outwardly attractive package…but that’s all that was: Packaging. It’s what’s inside that counts. And if after as many years as you and Pan have been kicking back, you still find your inner freak…well, I would say that’s pretty darn sexy!!
OK….back to the begging the dominatrix for sex…please, Bitchy, please! You promised to tell us about the handcuffs, with a side of piss!!
August 28, 2007 at 12:20 pm
“I am not very attractive.”
And yet you have the adoration of two of the sexiest men I’ve ever heard described. Go figure. I suspect that, maybe, just maybe, your attractiveness does not rely on your BMI.
August 28, 2007 at 2:33 pm
She seems to do alright for a fat girl!
August 28, 2007 at 6:11 pm
said he was going to have to update his book of off-beat sexual experiences.
Off-beat beat-offs, as it were.
August 28, 2007 at 6:25 pm
And yet you have the adoration of two of the sexiest men I’ve ever heard described
Well, ‘xactly
Hee
August 28, 2007 at 6:38 pm
OK….back to the begging the dominatrix for sex…please, Bitchy, please! You promised to tell us about the handcuffs, with a side of piss!!
I can’t write about it until I have done it, can I?
And I am doing it now (ish)
August 28, 2007 at 8:50 pm
I read parts of this out loud to this week’s man-toy whilst he did the washing-up, causing him to laugh hugely, applaud… and then, after the bit about the white lab-coat, offered to go put his Star Trek uniform on.
I just might take him up on it, but I don’t think I could keep a straight face.
August 29, 2007 at 5:19 am
Hello Beej,
This isn’t entirely on topic for this post, I know, but I’m having trouble getting my head round this and I thought maybe you could help me out.
You’ve done quite a few posts about all the things which are broken in the world of dominant women. Featuring prominently in those posts are strapons, media representations of dominant women, and fetishwear.
I notice you have a link in your sidebar to the very lovely work of Sardax. Now, it would seem to me, that the delectable work of Sardax (with whom I personally have no issue whatsoever), and indeed Sardax’s entire site would seem to be devoted more or less exclusively to the kind of representation of dominant women which you have so often railed against as being part of what is broken in all of femdomness.
I was just wondering if you would care to describe what’s up with that? No response is required, of course, but I really would like to know.
Many thanks,
Lubyanka.
ps: I am sincerely glad you’re having such a great time with Jack.
August 29, 2007 at 9:40 am
I have many, many literate and witty fans of strap-ons listed and a pro dom whose writing I adore. I think Sardax’s work is interesting and important.
But mostly, I just crush on him. I’m a bit nutty about talent.
August 29, 2007 at 12:29 pm
Sardax’s work reminds me of Dali. And I heard a rumor from people who saw him interact with his wife that Dali had a bit of a subbie thing going on.
August 29, 2007 at 12:37 pm
I’ve heard something like that too. I don’t like Dali much though. Oh, except that one of Christ. That’s lovely.
August 29, 2007 at 3:00 pm
Beej,
Thanks for responding.
But doesn’t Sardax’s work (no matter how gifted he may be) anger you in similar ways to the ways other “misrepresentations” of femdom anger you?
Ok, one prodom’s writing which you admire, I can get my head round. But an individual (however talented), who is personally adding to images of femdommery which you seem to think are stabbing you personally in the guts, in your blogroll?
How can you write what you’ve written, and truly believe it, and yet also consider Sardax’s work to be interesting and important, when it transgresses every stated boundary you’ve expressed?
(Sorry Sardax, nothing personal)
I’m just having problems working out what I see as unresolvable contradictions here.
Can you help me out with this, please? I’d appreciate it.
Thank you,
Lubyanka.
August 29, 2007 at 3:19 pm
Wow a woman making contradictory statements! Who’d woulda thunk it. Still I bet the artist in question is not unflattered to be compared with Salvidor Dali, (lovable, loony old fascist that he was).
August 29, 2007 at 4:19 pm
Luby
If I only linked to sites that contained nothing that contradicted The Gospel According to BJ I’d have a pretty barren blogroll.
That’s kind of the issue.
August 29, 2007 at 4:52 pm
But that contradicts what you said to that cafe owner about putting femdom art on the walls, and leaving the walls bare if there wasn’t any.
Why not have an emptier blogroll if otherwise you must link to things which offend you?
August 29, 2007 at 5:01 pm
Yeah, but some of Sardax’s work is fucking hot. And I would love to see it on the walls of CCK. And I can’t link to *part* of his website.
But, look, Luby, I have just spent 24 hours straight having sex with Jack and now he’s gone I want to write about all the pissing and choking and slapping…
August 29, 2007 at 7:25 pm
Also, the concept of trying to keep people contained within a portion of the Internet that only houses your own ideas is completely laughable. So is the concept of pretending you’re the only resource out there; better to link to contradicting websites and let people educate themselves on a broader basis.
More cross-links makes Bitchy’s site more interesting, and I think she trusts most of her readers to make up their own minds about the value, sexiness, and messages of what she’s showing them.
September 3, 2007 at 5:22 pm
About the apparent contradiction of linking to Sardax:
“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.”
Thank you, Mark Twain
September 5, 2007 at 12:01 am
Emerson!
September 5, 2007 at 10:05 pm
Lake and Palmer!