Comments on: Dominatrixin’ http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/ It's good to be mean Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:22:30 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Tom Allen http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4492 Tom Allen Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:05:42 +0000 http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4492 Lake and Palmer! Lake and Palmer!

]]> By: devastatingyet http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4458 devastatingyet Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:01:25 +0000 http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4458 Emerson! Emerson!

]]> By: alpha_femm http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4435 alpha_femm Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:22:53 +0000 http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4435 About the apparent contradiction of linking to Sardax: "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." Thank you, Mark Twain :) About the apparent contradiction of linking to Sardax:

“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.”

Thank you, Mark Twain :)

]]> By: Eileen http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4352 Eileen Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:25:23 +0000 http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4352 Also, the concept of trying to keep people contained within a portion of the Internet that only houses your own ideas is completely laughable. So is the concept of pretending you're the only resource out there; better to link to contradicting websites and let people educate themselves on a broader basis. More cross-links makes Bitchy's site more interesting, and I think she trusts most of her readers to make up their own minds about the value, sexiness, and messages of what she's showing them. Also, the concept of trying to keep people contained within a portion of the Internet that only houses your own ideas is completely laughable. So is the concept of pretending you’re the only resource out there; better to link to contradicting websites and let people educate themselves on a broader basis.

More cross-links makes Bitchy’s site more interesting, and I think she trusts most of her readers to make up their own minds about the value, sexiness, and messages of what she’s showing them.

]]> By: bitchyjones http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4350 bitchyjones Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:01:44 +0000 http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4350 Yeah, but some of Sardax's work is fucking hot. And I would love to see it on the walls of CCK. And I can't link to *part* of his website. But, look, Luby, I have just spent 24 hours straight having sex with Jack and now he's gone I want to write about all the pissing and choking and slapping... Yeah, but some of Sardax’s work is fucking hot. And I would love to see it on the walls of CCK. And I can’t link to *part* of his website.

But, look, Luby, I have just spent 24 hours straight having sex with Jack and now he’s gone I want to write about all the pissing and choking and slapping…

]]> By: Lady Lubyanka http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4349 Lady Lubyanka Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:52:52 +0000 http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4349 But that contradicts what you said to that cafe owner about putting femdom art on the walls, and leaving the walls bare if there wasn't any. Why not have an emptier blogroll if otherwise you must link to things which offend you? But that contradicts what you said to that cafe owner about putting femdom art on the walls, and leaving the walls bare if there wasn’t any.

Why not have an emptier blogroll if otherwise you must link to things which offend you?

]]> By: bitchyjones http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4348 bitchyjones Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:19:49 +0000 http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4348 Luby If I only linked to sites that contained nothing that contradicted <em>The Gospel According to BJ</em> I'd have a pretty barren blogroll. That's kind of the issue. Luby

If I only linked to sites that contained nothing that contradicted The Gospel According to BJ I’d have a pretty barren blogroll.

That’s kind of the issue.

]]> By: Toni http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4347 Toni Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:19:18 +0000 http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4347 Wow a woman making contradictory statements! Who'd woulda thunk it. Still I bet the artist in question is not unflattered to be compared with Salvidor Dali, (lovable, loony old fascist that he was). Wow a woman making contradictory statements! Who’d woulda thunk it. Still I bet the artist in question is not unflattered to be compared with Salvidor Dali, (lovable, loony old fascist that he was).

]]> By: Lady Lubyanka http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4346 Lady Lubyanka Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:00:23 +0000 http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4346 Beej, Thanks for responding. :) But doesn't Sardax's work (no matter how gifted he may be) anger you in similar ways to the ways other "misrepresentations" of femdom anger you? Ok, one prodom's writing which you admire, I can get my head round. But an individual (however talented), who is personally adding to images of femdommery which you seem to think are stabbing you personally in the guts, in your blogroll? How can you write what you've written, and truly believe it, and yet also consider Sardax's work to be interesting and important, when it transgresses every stated boundary you've expressed? (Sorry Sardax, nothing personal) I'm just having problems working out what I see as unresolvable contradictions here. Can you help me out with this, please? I'd appreciate it. :) Thank you, Lubyanka. Beej,

Thanks for responding. :)

But doesn’t Sardax’s work (no matter how gifted he may be) anger you in similar ways to the ways other “misrepresentations” of femdom anger you?

Ok, one prodom’s writing which you admire, I can get my head round. But an individual (however talented), who is personally adding to images of femdommery which you seem to think are stabbing you personally in the guts, in your blogroll?

How can you write what you’ve written, and truly believe it, and yet also consider Sardax’s work to be interesting and important, when it transgresses every stated boundary you’ve expressed?

(Sorry Sardax, nothing personal)

I’m just having problems working out what I see as unresolvable contradictions here.

Can you help me out with this, please? I’d appreciate it. :)

Thank you,

Lubyanka.

]]> By: bitchyjones http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4345 bitchyjones Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:37:28 +0000 http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/dominatrixin/#comment-4345 I've heard something like that too. I don't like Dali much though. Oh, except that one of Christ. That's lovely. I’ve heard something like that too. I don’t like Dali much though. Oh, except that one of Christ. That’s lovely.

]]>