September 22, 2007...12:47 am
You Too Can Be a Professional Asshat
I *was* surfing for something fun to do with Jack. But I was already getting tired of reading about Mr Sir’s suggestions of piss ice lollies etcetera and primed and mildly irritated when I stumbled upon this.
And I’m reading it and thinking how fucking annoying it is. And then I remember – oh yuh, this is why I started Bitchy Jones’s Diary. Maybe I should write about it.
And you know, I see this kind of stuff all the time on prodom’s paysite-enticement splash-pages – but this is presented as education (although what it is teaching is not clear.) And this is not okay. This is not education. It is lies and confusion and CAPSLOCK.
I have very, very grey opinions of the people who are held aloft as kink spokespersons anyway. But everyone’s heard of Gloria Brame and her PhD and her book. These articles aren’t by her, but they are on her site as a resource. There is a ‘not my opinions‘ disclaimer – but, oh damn, look at this stuff.
Or don’t. Don’t read the whole thing. It’s every value of stupid.
It’s by someone called Domina Zan Misery (yes, really) and someone else is involved called The Marquesa. God damn - I really could not have made that one up. MISTRESS LASH is the limit of my satire skills. The Marquesa? Fuckshit. Is the phrase ‘Kill me now‘ overused yet? Kill me now.
The first article (there are two – we’re spoiled) is called
EVERYTHING YOU EVER WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT PROFESSIONAL DOMINATION
by Domina Zan Misery
And part one is called
EXPLAINING THE DOMINA’S ALLURE
Oh. The allure. Yes, what is it that attracts submissive men to dominant women? Please enlighten me. It is so fucking mysterious.
Of course a gorgeous latex clad Woman towering over you in six inch heels may bring you to your knees with Her beauty
Oh, okay. This stuff.
There are apparently 8 types of SM/Fetish Fantasy. Good to know.
Bondage, Discipline, Training , Crossdressing, Infantilism, Role-play scenarios (including Medical Scenes), Torture, and Body Worship (Non-oral-genital.)
It’s as clean cut as that. And no one needs to worry if torture really needs its own category or if cross dressing or infantilism might in fact be *kinds* of role play. Or if, you know, it might *all* be kinds of role play. ‘Cause, you know, it isn’t *real*. It is all pretending.
And why is infantilism on this list. Sure, it exists. It’s a weird fetish. But this isn’t a list of weird fetishes this is a list of the 8 kinds of BDSM. Is one eighth of BDSM infantilism? That seems, well, unlikely.
The Marquesa, and I, Domina Zan Misery, are Professional Dominatrices , Sensual Sadists, and Lifestyle Mistresses.
It’s rare to get so much that is so wrong combined in one sentence – but that there is a masterwork. Where to begin: Marquesa! Domina! Dominatrices! Lifestyle Mistresses! (What even is that? Do you never drop the bitch-face? Who would really want to be a Lifestyle Mistress? Especially as it’s your job too. Take a day off once in a while, Chuckles. Wear some comfy shoes.)
“Green Mistress”, means, ‘Please continue exactly what You are doing, it feels great.’
Green, Mistress! That is just funny. Sorry it is. Also, what is wrong with saying ‘Oh my god that feels great.‘ I know a little bit of play with codes is sometimes good for role play, but saying ‘green, mistress‘ instead of saying ‘Uh. Fuck.’ Well, cuh.
Both the Dominant and the submissive can use safewords. If the masochist loses the ability to judge their safety in the heat of a whipping scene, the Sadist must recognise when to call “Yellow”.
Or you could just stop doing the whipping. You know, just a thought, rather than start talking on code to someone who’s gone a bit wah-wah.
I’m not the best person to talk to about safe words. (I think Jack has just noticed he doesn’t have one.) But surely a dom doesn’t need to use her own safe word to make herself stop whipping someone. That is lunar-crazy.
Mistress Poison has a client who has a fetish for rubber rain boots, and a raincoat on the Mistress.
Mistress Poison? Nice. Classy.
There are four types of bondage; Hard, Soft, Humiliating, and self-restraint
Another list. Great. Four types of bondage, you say? Glad that is clear.
And apparently Forced Feminisation comes under humiliating bondage. Um, what? Could you clarify what the fuck you are talking about.
Humiliating bondage often includes “forced” feminization with the sub being restrained with a corset, high heels, a wig and makeup. (Dominas in corsets and thigh-high lace-up stiletto boots are also in bondage, but are not humiliated. I can get uncomfortable in heels after a few hours, but I feel and look very powerful when I am wearing my fetish gear.
Huh? Dominoes *are* in bondage, but are *not* humiliated. Oh noes, ’cause getting paid for doing slutty goth dress up is *in* *no* *way* humiliating.
And, for serious, the point where she starts talking about how she switches in real life whilst still using the fucking CAPSLOCK PROTOCOL!
One of my favourite thing about switching and switches is that they defuse all that *crap* about dominant people and submissive people actually being different *kinds* of people, to the extend that they language needs to be reformed to reflect this. But I guess that is lost on Chuckles.
Ah, now the hitting men with stuff section. Ooh, apparently some stuff goes thump and some goes sting. If Bitchy Jones is wielding it, it often goes ‘oh, fuck, hang on darling, that one doesn’t count‘ – but let’s not dwell on my failings. We’d be here forever. Anyway – let’s talk about other people’s failings. It’s more fun.
Marks, scarring, or bleeding is optional
Yeah, er, Chuckles? It’s actually *all* optional. You know that SSC thing you keep trotting out. Um, yeah.
Then there’s training. It gets a bit surreal here. There are, apparently 7 types of ‘training’
There are (mainly) 7 different training methods; submissive, maid, slave, slut, toilet, dog or equestrian training.
That list, of course, isn’t arbitrary at all (why is ‘submissive‘ separate? is ‘dog and equestrian‘ one or two? Why not ‘canine and equestrian‘ or ‘dog and horse‘? Asshat).
And I’m not at all sad that she missed out my favourites: pig boy training, hole-digging training and pirate training.
Really, the world needs more submissive pirates.
Luckily ’submissive’ training does include being training how to run a bath for Mistress. Yes. Trained!
1. Turn on taps
2. When bath is full, turn off taps
Slut training is simply being a shameless, vulgar harlot. It often means throwing your ego out the window and being a complete trollop. This includes body language, clothing, makeup, and sexual knowledge. Most slut training involves men crossdressing as whores and behaving as such.
Arrrgh! Just WTF? Also, crossdressing as *whores*? Does Chuckles not see the fucking irony in this? Seriously, why don’t you just refine the process right down and have the guy humiliate himself by dressing up as a prodom and performing whatever ridiculous outré sexual services his mistress role playing as a “client” can dream up and present as submission. Fuck’s sake!
For the extremely perverse; ‘Roman Showers’, are to be gifted with your Mistress’s vomit.
Okay, sure, this is rare and we’ll stay away from the sheer ew, gross, WTF and instead ask, How submissive is it really to pay another person to throw up for your kinky indulgence?
Some people enjoy training because they need very strict rules on how to live, and have difficulty with self- discipline
Oh please, submissives have trouble with self discipline. Oh fuck! I fucking hate that shit. Yez, subs are weak and need glorious doms to tell them how to live ’cause they don’t have no brains in their pretty ickle heads.
Fuck you. Seriously. Fuck you with a glass ladle.
As a Professional Dominatrix, I can torture someone quite safely and consensually.
Of course, as am amdom, I am both dangerous and a rapist.
Many of My clients crave extreme pain. Being a Sadist, I enjoy giving it to them… Many drops of hot wax followed by a bucket of ice-cold water can be fun, too.
Whee! Sadism is fun
Some people like to “live on the edge”, and this can be done safely with a Professional Dominatrix.
Or, you know, dangerously with me. Also, on the edge of what? Sanity?
A few Dominatrices allow their clientele the intimacy of “oral servitude”. Myself, and any other Dominas affiliated with the Labyrinth do not service our clients with oral-genital skin-to-skin “body worship”. We permit our gentlemen to adore our spiritual presence and physical body in a manner which is clean, legal, safe, and in keeping with the proper etiquette of a Mistress/submissive relationship.
Ack, so, okay. Skin-to-skin contact is not “in keeping” with the proper etiquette of a Mistress/submissive relationship. Shit.
And to accentuate this point there is then another whole article about whether or not prodoms should have sex with their clients. Not, seems to be the conclusion.
I thought that was just a legal reach around. Not that I know. I have never sat down and looked into the legalities of prodommery. I haven’t looked into the legalities of lion taming either. Not lately.
There is some crap about the legals. And some more crap about not catching STDs. You know who else says don’t have sex because sex is so disease ridden?
But then:
The biggest reason to not have an intimate sexual Dominant/submissive relationship, is because such an interaction is fundamentally against the principals of a Dominant Woman’s and a submissive males’ exchange of power. Professional Doms are the Untouchable Goddess to sub. males.( The literal meaning of the term “Dominatrix” is Queen.)
Firstly, Dominatrix doesn’t mean queen. That hasn’t become true since you last said it.
Secondly, fuck you. Why don’t I get the sex? I am too superior for sex! That fucking sucks!
There is a whole thing around dominant women not having sex, or kissing, or being sexual, or alive, or fired by real passion. And that stuff comes from pros - and pros put it about to get around providing dick-stiffening services that are not sex oh noes.
And that’s what annoys me, the whole blithe fucking it up for the rest of us.
I don’t really care how you make a living. I happen think sex is nice and I like giving it away. It makes me happy. I got my sexay for free. I pass it on. But I do believe people own their own bodies and can do what they like with them - up to the point where they start screwing up other people lives.
Then they ought to stop.
By the nature of sex, men cannot look up to a Woman who lowers Herself to his level for physical sexual gratification. Men equate sex with power and penetration, and Women generally equate sex with vulnerability and emotional and physical surrender, by the fact that men put their penises inside a Woman’s vagina (or mouth, or anus) and inside Her body. A man naturally feels he has to be in control in most sexual exchanges, and if a man is truly submissive, he should want to give the power and control to a Superior Dominant Woman.
That Bitchy Jones, she’s so mean to poor defenceless prodoms. Prodoms have no power or say and WTF have they ever done to her?
Fuckshitasshatcrap


70 Comments
September 22, 2007 at 2:39 am
Women generally equate sex with vulnerability and emotional and physical surrender, by the fact that men put their penises inside a Woman’s vagina (or mouth, or anus) and inside Her body.
Who the hell is this, Andrea Dworkin?
Once again, Beej, I’m not sure what you’re ranting about. Or rather, I think I know, but I’m at a loss to understand why you and I see this so differently.
People like rules. That is, people like games and playtime, and inherent in games are some sets of rules that act as a constraining mechanism. I’m beginning to see that this is perhaps at the root of the whole “good subs do X, proper dommes do Y” lists that so many of these people carry around in their heads; they must like th interplay of the rules because the constraints give them some kind of framework within which their fantasies make sense.
And let’s not forget that subs need doms who will play with them, so said doms must obviously be people for whom the rules also make sense; why else would they play?
Think of it this way: have any friends who are into LARP or serious D&D fans? MTG? I know some and they’ve got the special packs of cards and play the games dressed in costumes. One young man I know has a favorite pack of MTG cards bought plastic covers for them. Yes, all 100+ cards.
For some reason, the “I can’t have sex with a sub” rule makes sense to some people on some level. Even I can - barely - “get” why this might work for some people (after all, it works for Mrs. Edge and I for short term, albeit different reasons).
The part that I don’t get, though - and where I do have to agree with you - is when these sexual LARP gamers make these pronouncements upon the rest of us mortals, or try to drag us into their own fantasy worlds. FGS, people, stop trying to extend those rules to the rest of us.
September 22, 2007 at 3:12 am
Submissive pirates? Bring them on.
The Ice Queen Frigid Anti-Sex Domly Domme routine always cracks me up too. Honestly it strikes me as a theoretical justification for the legal necessity of “No, worm, you can’t lick My pussy.” Personally I think the cuckold mindset makes more sense: dominant women should get all the boinking their black little hearts desire.
You *need* to be nominated as the official pundit of femdom, if nobody’s done it already… it’s overdue.
September 22, 2007 at 3:16 am
Tom- I’ve got a guess as to why the “I can’t have sex with a sub” rule makes sense to some femdoms on some level. Some of them admit, in private, that they just aren’t turned on by submissive men. They like the sadist’s high, they like the service, but they just don’t want to get into bed with a submissive man (maybe it’s a generational thing?).
September 22, 2007 at 4:56 am
Hm… Pirates do dig holes to bury treasure. You might be able to combine the pirate training with hole digging training. Not sure how you’d work in the pig boy training for a trifecta though.
September 22, 2007 at 7:15 am
First I have to say, I went to a couple of seminars by Gloria Brame (at our local bdsm conference) and she was awesome. She really is not like that crap suggests even though she let it be posted on her site. I know this doesn’t matter at all, but still.
That article really is bad. If there are submissive men who can only think of fucking as a dominant (on the male’s part) act and therefore lose respect for dominant women who have sex, well, fuck ‘em. There’s plenty of pro doms they can pay to refrain from “submitting” to their ministrations. Yay.
And if there are dominant women who can only see fucking as submission (on their part)…I wouldn’t know what to say. Try to figure out what you enjoy, and do that thing. If your ideas are preventing you from having a good time, try to fix them. It’s not rocket science.
I think the idea that pro doms are intrinsically safe is funny. I suppose if they were constantly unsafe, they’d be more likely to get caught than one of us amateurs just because they do more stuff more often than us. But they’re just people and a lot of them are doubtless big fuckups. You have to pay attention to who you play with no matter what.
And I hate that thing like .. “if you have this weird disgusting desire, you can satiate it safely with a pro dom.” Like submission is a disease that will otherwise destroy your life. Fuck that.
I sound angry, but I’m actually quite happy right now. My amateur self just got back from a delightful time with my amateur submissive boyfriend. (Can you imagine? I don’t even have to pay him and he lets me satisfy my desires “safely” with him anyway.)
September 22, 2007 at 8:12 am
Honestly Tom, I know you know what I’m ranting about. The problem is precisely the imposing. Making rules between yourselves is fine. Presenting those rules as education about how it has to be is not.
You know how thickly this stuff gets spread around. How *dare* pros tell me what is ‘in keeping’ with a proper relationship between a dominant woman and a submissive man - when we know their motives are based on the legalities of selling sex and sexual services.
But you know, Tom, if you really don’t like it and want me to stop, just say red and I’ll stop.
September 22, 2007 at 8:14 am
Devastatingly
If you see her again, tell her to take this crap off her site. It is one of, I think, 2 articles about femdom on her resources page.
I’m sure she’s cool - but this isn’t okay.
September 22, 2007 at 8:22 am
Sabrina
Sorry - that thing about pros not being turned on by submissive men is just horrible. If that’s true, and that’s what is really going on…
…oh fuck. That’s really horrible. I don’t know what to say about that. I’m just lost.
This stuff is so fucked up. Can you imagine for a second that a mandom might be not turned on by submissive women. Can you imagine that ever being a thing.
I know there is that whole submissive man trope of not being able to fulfill a woman, of not being desired. But this is so all consuming. If the messages that define femdom are coming from women who are not turned on by submissive men.
Christ. I lost. I lost. I lost before I began.
September 22, 2007 at 8:23 am
Vague
There could be a pirate pig. He could dig with his snout. God that would be, um, *awful*.
Except not.
Oh dear.
September 22, 2007 at 9:31 am
Submissive pirates?
We should talk, or parley at least.
Yarrr.
September 22, 2007 at 9:37 am
You know, with you that might actually really work and be hot. You’re an unusual man.
September 22, 2007 at 9:39 am
I thank you.
September 22, 2007 at 9:52 am
I love it when you comment on my blog. Even though it is probably sugary-dull for all the viewers, I do not care.
I love Bitchy Jones and Jack. They are OMG-cute.
September 22, 2007 at 10:24 am
You could be Circe and turn the pirates into pigs?
September 22, 2007 at 10:34 am
Well, yeah, except I can’t.
Oh, you know, I have a whole big post about Circe somewhere. I do not like her so much ’cause she gets conquered and just wants a strong man to show her what’s what.
I like Calypso. She keeps him for 7 years and makes him fuck her every night so he cries every morning.
Like I say, I have this whole thing… I should post it. I love that story.
September 22, 2007 at 11:32 am
“By the nature of sex, men cannot look up to a Woman who lowers Herself to his level for physical sexual gratification. Women generally equate sex with vulnerability and emotional and physical surrender, by the fact that men put their penises inside a Woman’s vagina (or mouth, or anus) and inside Her body.”
God, this viewpoint makes me so fucking angry. One of the reasons I started writing about my own sex life in the first place was to challenge shit like that. I mean, how fucking sexist can you get?? Jesus, it’s like they’re still in the 1950s, spouting that crap.
As for submissive pirates, reading that just made my day. The thought of a man being threatened with walking the plank, and then trussed up in shackles with his legs spread around the mast? Mmmm…
September 22, 2007 at 11:35 am
It is so vile and made of asshat crap. At least there is the thought of pirate Jack to sweeten the enragement.
September 22, 2007 at 12:44 pm
GOD.
You were being nice to me, not sending me the article link ahead of time, weren’t you?
You know how stressful everything else has been…at least I waited until the weekend to pop a blood vessel over this one.
I mean *really* and what the fuck. I’ll take the potpourri shit over this stuff.
FWIW, choosing to separate BDSM stuff from actual “sex”, sure why not. It’s a smorgasbord, why not?. (I love a good smorgasbord, btw, not the crappy “eat for 7.99 type”, but the really good ones.) Maybe you only want the salad and jello mold one night, or for the rest of your life.
Just don’t tell me the Way It Is Done is that I never get the Swedish meatballs or god forbid the Sushi. I like everything except brussel sprouts.
Ignorant crap!
hugs, E
September 22, 2007 at 12:51 pm
And you know, this isn’t on a typical ‘ignorant crap’ site, or a pro’s site or a personal website like potpourri was. This is on the website of an academic who studies sexuality and specialises in kink.
This is ignorant crap making out it is peer reviewed *science*. Practically.
September 22, 2007 at 1:15 pm
Oh, god.
You don’t recognise your sexuality in the links you post? I’m not only with you on that one, I start thinking I might be in the wrong career. I don’t recognise my off-duty sexuality OR my prodomination in that bullshit.
September 22, 2007 at 2:10 pm
Bitchy writes:
(What even is that? Do you never drop the bitch-face? Who would really want to be a Lifestyle Mistress? Especially as it’s your job too. Take a day off once in a while, Chuckles. Wear some comfy shoes.)
I do not know why, but I am laughing so hard at this point I can’t even finish the post! You ARE killing me here!!
I will go wipe away my tears and be back later after I read all your erudite observations…the humor has slain me this morning.
September 22, 2007 at 2:34 pm
“Dominoes”
Ha! Lo, I am slain. I so love your rants, Bitchy.
And pirate training? Oh boy yes!
September 22, 2007 at 2:35 pm
I don’t like to boast, but I am actually Queen of the Dominoes. The reason I assumed the title is lost in legend, but I assure you I wear the mantle with pride.
September 22, 2007 at 2:37 pm
I hate anything like this that makes me have to *explain* myself to submissive men. Then come off like I’m trying to prove myself or some shit. I hate that. To quote Bitchy, like an explosion of hate in a hate factory.
She writes as if dominant women don’t exist, except the ones that dominate for money and would never stoop so low as to have sex with a submissive man (which would ruin everything, ban them from domme-dom, etc.). Well fuck you. Yah, but from a distance. Visually, you know.
Submissive men: don’t have a relationship with ME, because I won’t be safe! I might even have skin to skin contact with you, and that would only prove I’m not really dominant! You’d soon find out I have never studied the six types of this and eight ways to that, and so I must not know what I’m doing! Go to a fucking pro-domme and do it RIGHT, for Christ’s sake. Go do body-worship from six feet away, I mean that just makes so much more SENSE. Get with someone who has a fucking degree in this shit. Someone you can obviously TRUST.
September 22, 2007 at 2:38 pm
[QueSera explodes]
September 22, 2007 at 2:38 pm
Oh damn. First Maisy leaves. Then the Jack that isn’t my Jack gets bored. And now I have killed Que Sera.
It’s starting to get echoey in here.
September 22, 2007 at 2:39 pm
Bitchy,I think you’ve came upon a site for hysterical people with special educational needs.
We shouldn’t mock them.It’s cruel.
September 22, 2007 at 2:47 pm
I meant article,not the site,though.
September 22, 2007 at 2:52 pm
Yeah, well, surely the people who run this site have read this article. They present it there and say ‘enjoy’ or something.
September 22, 2007 at 2:55 pm
Enjoy!
Really?
Enjoy being told that By the nature of sex, men cannot look up to a Woman who lowers Herself to his level for physical sexual gratification
Who *lowers herself*.
Yes. Women who have sex are dirty and wrong and should remain pure and chaste and OHFUCKWHATYEARISTHIS! JESUS-H-FUCKFACE!
September 22, 2007 at 2:59 pm
Holy carp, I knew it was bad out there, but that article being on that site fucking amazes me. I’m in such shock that someone is spouting that bullshit as universal truth, that I can’t even be mad at it. Yet.
But hell what do I know, right? I like hitting boys and seeing torment and supplication in their eyes, but gee I must really be submissive, seeing as how I like sex and all.
September 22, 2007 at 3:01 pm
You don’t ‘like sex’, you ‘lower yourself’ for ‘physical sexual gratification’
September 22, 2007 at 3:06 pm
Actually, I feel a lot better having exploded into smithereens all over my apartment. It’s just one smithereen that’s now writing this reply.
(HA! I did it. I always wanted to use the singular of ’smithereens.’
If you’re in a mood to explode, Bitchy, you’re welcome to join me. Maybe all of our smithereens will grow up to be proper prodommes.
Or, save up your mood and unleash it on Jack. Or the other guy. Oh, hell, even someone random. In fact, that’s sounding better and better to me.
September 22, 2007 at 3:09 pm
I have no Jack. Or anyone. I am all alone (except for the smithereens). No hitty rage for me.
I threw a cushion earlier - aroudn the time I slipped into CAPSLOCK above.
I’m calmer now. Shall we breathe together.
September 22, 2007 at 3:53 pm
It’s starting to get echoey in here.
That’s okay, Beej, you’ve still got me.
In fact, I think I’ll go mow the lawn now, just to do something physical for you. You know, to give you some moral support and all that.
September 22, 2007 at 3:57 pm
Talking of moral support, when am I getting my dirty pictures of you?
And you know that when I say *dirty* I mean… Well, you know what I mean…
September 22, 2007 at 5:58 pm
I think people like the one you mention does not deserve we explode or even mock,because they’re completely idiot.
Those women and men disguise their difficulties in having a sexual relationship by telling sex is bad ,etc.
Personally,I believe those women hate being women and envy men ( why simulate they have a cock,why avoiding the actual thing,why the attempts on diminishing masculinity and claming their hate for all the women who enjoy sex?!) and those male subs must have a shitty self-esteem.
I’m a masochist and,though I like violent sex scenes and yes,sometimes I even consider being penetrated to being dominated, I fail to see the connection between liking sex and being inferior.
Perhaps those women would prefer being fucking saints and being adored into some church,like Virgin Mary,which is the worse definition of womanhood humankind could’ve ever imagined.
September 22, 2007 at 6:03 pm
And the thing is Coralina, there is nothing wrong with a woman getting off on being sexually conquered. If that’s your kink, I think it’s great that you can take those kind of oppressive inequities and get off on them. Hell, that’s cool.
Less cool is saying *all* *sex* is women being conquered and that I can’t have sex and still enjoy all the fun of having a dominant sexuality.
‘Cause I like sex. It feels nice. When I tell a guy to fuck me and he does and he *works* to make me feel amazing and then asks permission to come - I don’t feel conquered.
And, actually, rough sex can just be fun. Sometimes I like to feel overwhelmed by the sensations of it. To have my brain shut down. Sometimes there is too much bloody thinking and brain-sex in d/s. Sometimes it’s nice to just do it. I like that. I like getting what I like.
Sex is a versatile thing. Sex is clever. Sex shrinks to fit.
September 22, 2007 at 8:58 pm
Mm, it all does seem to come down to the notion that telling someone else what to do in reality is just wrong. Of course, if I knew precisely when having you tell me what to do would piss me off instead of when it would make me all sex-wanting-submissive-like, I’d probably explode from the sheer delight.
September 22, 2007 at 9:03 pm
I’m willing to boss you around a little - in the interests of finding out.
(Not that I’m going to be the only one offering, I imagine)
September 23, 2007 at 12:26 am
Re: submissive pirates, May is my cabin boy.
Re: LARPs, my LARP character, um, is a pirate. I shit you not.
Re: everything else, I think ya’ll have pretty much covered the asshattery. And funny. Oh, funny.
September 23, 2007 at 6:02 am
Bitchy
The sad part is, these weren’t pros. These were amateur, uncompensated-type dominant women. Dating and/or married to submissive men.
That couldn’t get it up, so to speak, mentally, for submissive men.
I suspect the “default sexuality” of male aggressive/female overpowered that’s in everything from romance novels to perfume ads might have something to do with this.
When you write about submissive men, and why they’re so hot - that’s important. Please don’t stop.
September 23, 2007 at 7:58 am
Well, writing about the hotness of submissive men isn’t really a chore.
It’s kind of on my mind quite a lot.
September 23, 2007 at 8:45 am
I want a submissive pirate. Avast me beauty, prepare to be boarded!
Anyways.
This stuff is just totally bizarre. I always think that those kind of dogmatic rules and lists are sort of ridiculous anyway, I think sex ought to be spontaneous and change, within the realms of consent and safety and stuff. I’d rather find myself trying something unexpected that feels really, really good than have a bunch of traffic light safe words and rules and stuff. I’m all for consent but sometimes I find I like to explore beyond a little beyond initial boundary I set, it can be really pleasurable.
September 23, 2007 at 8:51 am
Submissive pirates….
There has been talk of an eye patch, and an accent. I am very excited.
September 23, 2007 at 2:45 pm
As always, you rock, Bitchy. But you know it’s not just femdoms who get told what’s ok and not ok for them to do. My male dom complains about people who tell him he shouldn’t go down on subs because it’s inherently submissive. I say as the dom he has the right to do whatever the hell gets him off (which he does).
There’s too many rules out there. It gets in the way of getting off.
September 23, 2007 at 3:21 pm
Talking of moral support, when am I getting my dirty pictures of you?
Oh crap. I was digging in the dirt pit yesterday, too, and didn’t think to look for the damn camera.
September 23, 2007 at 7:59 pm
Oy. Bitchy, as much as I love reading you, this time you have gone too near. Your myriad fans –and I speak with total shamelessness for every one of us– read you because of your adventures and your attitude regarding same. Part of that attitude derives from your unhappiness with received femwisdom, most of which has been set in Stonehenge by the resident prodomme-druids. Not unusual. Priests tend not to be what they pretend to be and know very little about the secret lives of real people. So they set up rules. The rules become laws. Those who live outside the rules are not permitted to complain because they’re not properly baptised and those who feel the need to join a church feel compelled to accept the rules. BJ: You are outside the church for a reason. You live, you fuck, you fuck-up, you regret, you try again, learn, fuck-up and –thankfully– manage to write dervishly well about it all. In writing instead about the priesthood you waste your time, energy, life –and ours. Please, please, please write about BJ. OK, parenthetically you can laugh at the priesthood. But for the sake of all that is really bad and unholy, tell us about you. Fuck those idiots. Look, there are always going to be people [mostly men, but not always] who go to whores. This does not mean whores get to write the rules for sex, love, passion and spending intimate time with someone you really fancy in a creepy way. So why not create your own BJ’s Rules and say, categorically –and let’s hope more elegantly: [1] Anything more or less voluntary between two or amongst more than two adults is legit and terif; [2] Once money changes hands it’s just sad for both parties; [3] These are the only rules. Publish this in a fixed box at the top of your blog and then get on with the saga of you, him, him, him and him and how weird, scary, fine and dirty it all is. Bitchy, we love you. We [okay: me, me, ME!] would be so much happier reading about how you clip your toenails [full disclosure: not a real fetish interest] than about these femdiots and their unhappy clients. Pulleeze.
September 23, 2007 at 8:38 pm
Calm down!
As soon as I have d/s pirate sex I will write about it. Promise.
Meanwhile I like MSTing this shit. Why should I suffer alone? This post isn’t tagged shooting fish for nothing.
September 23, 2007 at 8:55 pm
We at the International Federation of Pirates regret to inform you that, for historical reasons relating to the dearth of females aboard ship, buccaneer eroticism traditionally has been of the pirate-pirate variety. That’s why we call it the Jolly Roger. Surely you can do better. What is it with the dressing up? Makes a mockery of fancy-dress parties, to say nothing of Halloween. What next: dog costumes? Or– need I say it –pig? What ever happened to naked or semi-naked, with maybe the odd accoutrement thrown in? Anyway, if you’re not careful pirate non-sex may turn up tomorrow on some pro-dom’s menu of kinks du jour.
September 24, 2007 at 7:35 am
When you write about submissive men, and why they’re so hot - that’s important. Please don’t stop.
Amen!
September 24, 2007 at 1:15 pm
RULE NUMBER ONE: Bitchy Jones shall write about whatever she damn well pleases.
Blogging is meant for catharsis…and if you can inform or humor the masses, so much the better for us!! I, personally, love it when you go off on a bit of a rant…my observation has been it’s usually followed up with some pretty hot stuff. One could almost surmise it acts as a bit of literary foreplay before the main event. And anyway, Les S More, we’re just hoping to keep her focused and distracted, simultaneously, until her birthday. Maybe the gentlemen in question will decide to make it a Pirate Party…uuummm…that’ll warm my day thinking of all those possibilities with Captain Bitchy ordering Pirate Pan to tie the mutinous Jack to the mast…..oh, well….back to reality!!
September 24, 2007 at 2:16 pm
But Hissy, I only have one eye-patch.
It is a white medical eye-patch, but I am going to cover it in some black duct tape I have, uh, lying around.
Me’s the clever.
September 24, 2007 at 3:31 pm
I really don’t like Gloria Brame. Really, really, really. I hung out for a while on her message boards, even dated someone I met there. They’re (or they were) really One True Wayish about D/s, even though they profess(ed) to not be.
And don’t even get me started on the “real D/sers don’t use safewords” crap.
(NB: I don’t mind if YOU don’t use safewords. I just don’t like the “they MEAN you lack control, because I said so!” shit.)
September 24, 2007 at 3:34 pm
Also:
“Of course, as am amdom, I am both dangerous and a rapist.”
YOU WIN THE INTERNET.
“Many of My clients crave extreme pain. Being a Sadist, I enjoy giving it to them… Many drops of hot wax followed by a bucket of ice-cold water can be fun, too.”
Oh dear Ma… THAT’s sadism? Strange, I thought it was beating people to the outer limits of their tolerance, not dripping wax on them…
garg.
September 24, 2007 at 3:40 pm
I don’t know much about her. I do have a prejudice around doctorate-flaunting. I’ve always found it somewhat gauche.
As for safewords. Sometimes yes, more often no. I just don’t play that way. Not ’cause I’m more real, or super tough, I just have an off-beat style. But I don’t make a value judgment on using them. And you know that if I did, I’d say.
“Green, mistress” just makes me laugh though
September 24, 2007 at 3:41 pm
Dear Goddess, now I can’t stop mocking it either.
“A man naturally feels he has to be in control in most sexual exchanges, and if a man is truly submissive, he should want to give the power and control to a Superior Dominant Woman.”
Superior Dominant Capitalizationment. Because “dominant” just isn’t enuff!
And also, um, the whole thing with the penetration: fine if you actually think that way and don’t want to be fucked, I don’t mind, I’m not huge on it myself. But please can we not be mashing together two things:
* penetration’s meaning for you or for the people who hire you
and
* the fact that being penetrated would count as prostitution and your actual reason for not doing it is y’know not wanting to go to jail?
because I’m really having trouble reading that and believing the person who wrote it is actually espousing her opinion, rather than coming up with some Prodom Approved justification for “why I don’t get fucked.”
And… men feel like they have to be in control of sexual exchanges? Does the word “submission” mean NOTHING to these people? Garg!
September 24, 2007 at 3:48 pm
It is exactly that. The reason why so much of femdom is so *sexless* is because so much of femdom is prodom and prodom seems to legally have to pretend not to be teh sex.
But, yuh, they don’t just say, ‘we cannot do sex ’cause of legals. But I can slap you around for cash.’
They say, ‘Oh ick, no. I cannot do sex because if a dom woman gets fucked she is not a dom because she is LOWERING HERSELF and that is the law forevers, Mr worm.’
Fuck this shit to death on fire.
It only even makes any sense if you think a woman doesn’t get pleasure from being fucked. Like NO women does. EVER.
I do.
I love to get fucked.
So isn’t it dominant, demanding, me getting my way, when I have Jack fuck me? How can it not be. I like it. It’s what I want. Does he suddenly become the dom in that moment? When? When he’s asking me for permission to come?
I am filled with boiling hate and rage now and I would rather be filled with COCK
September 24, 2007 at 4:07 pm
“Fuck this shit to death on fire.” I’m with you on that.
Also, I am full of rage right now - partly because of this piece, partly because of work shit and partly because my love life’s all kinds of crappyshittyfuckedup. I also would much rather be filled with cock than that. Additionally, perhaps it might help me if I hit someone very, very hard. Yes, I think it might: I’ve heard one can acheive some release that way too.
September 24, 2007 at 4:15 pm
I have a new hitty thing. I am pleased. I have been hitting my arm with it for hexperimentation.
Ow!
September 24, 2007 at 9:43 pm
Yeah, I have to admit that even as messed up and sexless as I am in my domination (due to my own delicious little issues), this is pretty fucking retarted.
I don’t have sex with my sub hitty playthings because of baby paranoia. I LOVE sex. I’d have 18 kids by now if I didn’t keep a real close watch on Ye Olde Vagina’s love of the cock.
I think some of this might be sort of a premtive cock-block of the pussy worship freaks, though.
I wonder how much of this sort of asshattery is a sort of wicked downward spiral reinforcing of the pussy worship dorks and the strippers with whips?
September 25, 2007 at 1:59 am
Trin: Oh, hot wax can be used in an incredibly sadistic fashion. Personally, I like to drip it over fresh cane welts. You’d be amazed how much that hurts!
Oops, sorry… off topic. *grin*
September 25, 2007 at 5:36 am
Sometimes reading you makes me want to quit my job, instead of reforming whoredom. And that’s saying something considering my tuition bills.
September 28, 2007 at 2:08 pm
“It only even makes any sense if you think a woman doesn’t get pleasure from being fucked. Like NO women does. EVER.”
Exactly. Which is a steaming pile of what the hell planet are you crazy people ON?
September 28, 2007 at 2:13 pm
“So isn’t it dominant, demanding, me getting my way, when I have Jack fuck me? How can it not be. I like it. It’s what I want. Does he suddenly become the dom in that moment? When? When he’s asking me for permission to come?”
Of course you’re not dominant then, BJ! By Convoluted Official Domination Logic, you’re only REALLY dominating if you order someone to do the stuff on The Official List. Anything else is marked as submission by you and earns you demerits on your Official Dominance Record.
September 28, 2007 at 2:15 pm
BJ on her new hitty thing:
I remember once I was at a workshop and tried out this nasty little rubber thing with thin wires. I went to smack my arm with it, MISSED, and the thing picked up speed (acceleration, kiddies!) and I WHANG myself as hard as all get out in the thigh.
I had a huge blue bruise for weeks. DO NOT BE LIKE ME, KIDS.
September 28, 2007 at 2:36 pm
New hitty thing is a riding crop. Only a cheapy bit of tat. But I had to buy it because it was *pink*. I love pink and I hate that all my lovely *stuff* only comes in black or black.
I was at the counter, squeaking excitedly about pinkness and the nice woman says oh, we have some pink floggers.
Ha, says me, little rubber floggers? On my boyfriend? I’m not trying to tickle him to death.
Also, in same shop at same time, Pan bought another fake cock for himself and he spent a long time lifting down dildos and showing them to me, saying, Is this as big as Jack? How about this?
September 28, 2007 at 9:20 pm
BJ, I have a friend who was the same exact way about purple toys.
The carabiners I often use in conjunction with my cuffs are purple, as a little nod to her.
September 29, 2007 at 10:26 am
Oh, for pink carabiners. Actually though, I love all colourful stuff. I have some blue handcuffs.
October 2, 2007 at 5:35 pm
JT’s stockroom (google em, I can’t link it from here) has quite a few pink things.
I happen to like leather cuffs better than handcuffs (I like being able to tie them up and leave one hand free, or move them around one limb at a time, when they can’t escape- it makes flipping them on their back or front in the bed easier and they can’t get away) and they have good ones in pink.
I just got a purple and glitter covered riding crop. I call it my Princess Sparkle Wand (Princess Sparkle is my version of Mistress Lash).
Leave a Reply