January 29, 2008...10:06 pm

The Complete Bitchy Jones

Jump to Comments

The only post of mine you ever need to read.

The first post I wrote here was on 20th January 2007.

It was about fetish clothing and being fat. I have changed what I think quite a lot since then – especially seeing as how I was just reposting it from my old weblog on Informed Consent. That post was actually first written in October 2001.

(A lot of the early posts on here were direct reposts from my old Informed Consent weblog (also called Bitchy Jones’s diary), up to and including Fuck Me – which got a much bigger response this time around.)

But the fact is all the things in this blog are things that I have been saying all over chat rooms and forums for years. This is the first time I ever felt like people were listening - or even cared.

So it’s been good - this year. I started this blog with no fanfare, no comments, and no readers. I didn’t tell anyone. I didn’t tell Pan or Gwen or any of the people who I know who now read it and then pop round to tell me that they liked the thing I wrote about piss. And then I get bashful. ‘Cause I am sort of shy, really. Shy about this stuff. These are probably the parts of myself I am least happy with. And I am neurotic as fuck so there’s a lot of competition.

Anyway, though, in the spirit of annual review I have decided to try and draw together the journey so far, look at how far we have come, and present everything I know in one tidy little only-slightly-rambly nutshell.

The Six Most Unpopular Popular Opinions of Bitchy Jones

1. Forced feminisation is misogynistic and must be stopped
One of the key pillars of femdom. The sissy maid. The panty boy. The guy who is humiliated by being ‘forced’ to cross dress. Take a man down with a degrading downgrade to woman

Just tell me how this isn’t insulting to women. Just tell me how any kind of happy fun sex for women is going to arise in a context where the first thing the guy wants is to be degraded by being made more like her. (And perhaps also called a ‘slut’, because then he’s like, a woman who likes sex and likes getting fucked and what could be more degrading than that…? Gee, I don’t know, perhaps being an actual woman and having your actual sexuality represented by this kind of anti-sex, anti-women, anti-women-having-recreational-sex CRAP?)

Some people have told me that it is really about looking silly or ridiculous and that being the humiliation. Not being a woman - just being a crappy looking woman. Which is a pretty awful defence for three reasons. First the idea that men in women’s clothes are ridiculous is pretty damn insulting to every kind of gender bending man who likes to cross dress for fun rather than for oh, this is so humiliating.

Secondly, it implies that what these forced fem panty boys are trying to be is ugly women. That that is what they see as the lowest of the low.

That’s the downgrade – and therefore the dominatrix still has power because she’s more attractive. That’s the only way you can be less than her. Be a woman. A less attractive woman. Oh so it’s not humiliating to be a *woman* - just to be an ugly woman.

Well fuck that and fuck you. And get this *shit* out of my kink.

So you think it’s humiliating to wear women’s underwear and not look like a supermodel? Well fucking guess what, yes it is thanks to you.

Thirdly, why the fuck would someone who wants to have sex with you want you too look ridiculous? Too much mansub stuff is deliberately, knowingly unsexy. It is a fucking slap in the face to women who really get off on stuff like this. All the doing female household chores and the small penis humiliation and the fucking cuckoldry. I get off on how I much I don’t get the woman off.

How nice for you. And I get…?

I get an answer to my question about why so few women are here who aren’t being paid to be here.

More stuff I wrote on this

2. Strap on cocks enforce a phallocentric idea of power and imply that allowing themselves to be fucked in the cunt is something women do as a favour to men.
A dominant woman is - almost universally in femdom - a woman with a cock. Was I really the first person to point out how *fucked* *up* this is?

Look at forced feminisation and strap on cocks together and you end up asking yourself, wtf? Why can’t femdom exist just between a boring old woman and a boring old man. Gender fuck twice (because the woman being on top is already gender fuck enough) and you end up back with reactionary ideas about who gets to be boss and who gets to be called a slut and pounded for it.

It just astounds me the lengths people will go to wrap femdom up on the safety of cock dominating cunt. Or cock dominanting man-pussy, a term that grossness decrees we can use to refer to men’s arseholes in this context. God. Man-pussy. That makes no sense. What is *my* arsehole then? Is that a man-pussy too? Or a woman pussy?

You see how confusing this stuff gets? The paradox of submission has nothing on this stoopid brain ache that is caused by the ridiculous desperation to degrade female sexuality even in this thing that is supposed to be about women getting what they want.

But men really run femdom. (Of course.) Right from the fact that woman who dominate invariably wear the obvious symbol of their honorary masculinity when they boss a man around for sex, right through female led relationships, where the women really are led – led right into someone else’s sexuality. Through to our number 3 – the prodom ubiquity. Where men really get to run everything.

More stuff I wrote about this

3. Professional Dominatrixes undermine real female desire and perpetuate ridiculous anti-sex notions of female sexual dominance
The vast majority of women who are (or claim to be) sexually dominant ask men for money. If you’re being paid for it he’s in charge. It’s not about a woman taking charge of her sexuality anymore it’s about women using their sexualities to get other stuff. It makes sex into something women supply and men demand.

It takes female sexual desire right out of the loop. My desires just wink and blink away. I don’t even exist.

This is and continues to be my problem with sex work (along with the vague assertion that sex workers are somehow more sexually liberated than women who have sex for, like, fun). And this is why I think Abby Lee is a trail blazer and Belle du Jour is an utter bore.

But there is more to prodomming than sex work. (Oh, it is sex work – no one claims strippers aren’t sex workers ‘cause they don’t have actual sex. It is. Accept that at least and that’s one less lie you’re telling about my sexuality.)

I have had brilliantly informative emails from prodoms and ex-prodoms who have pointed out that actually it isn’t all about the money. For the simple reason that the money ain’t that good. The market is saturated. Hence the phone lines and the old shoes for the sale and the general whiff of desperation that hangs around prodoms like the sweet scent of silicone spray.

But if prodoms aren’t doing this for money then why are they doing it?

Because it’s about being wanted and adored. They are enabling his fantasies because these are women who get their jollies simply from being *fantasy* personified. Being his own special creation. And, yes, he thinks you are pretty. (Is it any surprise so many pros are submissive in their private life?)

As another correspondent pointed out so brilliantly to me earlier today:

It’s pretty sad, when you think about it. A sub-culture that’s supposed to be about women actively wanting and desiring has been co-opted by the exact opposite - women who need to be wanted and desired. And that’s why it makes sense for them to lump all that perversion together under femdom (feminization, the age-play), because the point is to be the worshiped goddess, to grant man their fantasies in order to become the fantasy, and inflicting pain is just one flavor of that process.

Anyway, it’s no mystery to me why women who might actually be sexually aroused by a man collared and chained to a radiator are not so interested in this sub-culture. It’s driven by narcissism, not sex. And at the end of the day, I’d rather be fucked than worshiped.

Course, looking at it this way answers the perennial bothersome question of what the fuck is up with asshats who act like pros, strutting around like a mansub’s wet dream and being all anti-sex and all about being worshipped. (And then they get all ultra pissy when you mistake them for pros even though they are fucking indistinguishable from them.)

This is why I had to draft in a new word – asshat – to cover both am and prodoms who’s mission seems to be screwing all the sexiness out of femdom and doing most of that by referring to themselves by fucking ridiculous fucking names. Like Tsarina. I made that up – but I bet there is one.

More stuff I wrote about this

4. There are as many dominant women as there are submissive men
Everywhere you go you will hear about the idea that there are ten, twenty, even a hundred submissive men for every dominant woman. Course, this is rubbish. Why would this be the case? Whatever the cause of kink, be it social, genetic or magical those factors would create dominant women just as they created submissive men.

And although people like to posit all kinds of reasons for the femdom demographic issue – which is so blatantly responsible for the oh-so-typical-tragic mansub desperation and the whole prodom machine – there is nothing that is so clearly compelling as an answer to where all the dominant women are than the idea that, well, look around at this horrible, horrible world of femdom where the only power you are allowed to have over men is the power of being beautiful and men enjoy the submissive thrill of being totally unsexy.

Great. Nice.

No wonder so few dominant women are making it past the coat check.

More stuff I wrote about this

5. Everything – and I mean *everything* is broken.
Kinky sex has been now been ruined. It may even be beyond repair. People with genuine passionate incredible ideas about sex have no way of getting heard of the clamour of absolute asscrap. Some people like to blame the internet for this.

Well let me tell you something. The real life fetish scene – such as it exists in dreary market towns and throbbing metropolises is every bit as fucked up and woman-disappointing and over-crowded with horny clueless revolting men as the internet. A lot of people who love how real-life they are like to make out like the net is some kind of repository for people who are not big enough and brave enough to do real. And that *real* is better. And less full of idiots.

The reverse is true.

If the kinky internet is fucked, the kinky not-internet is worse. For example, when did you last encounter a website that enforced an oppressive I’ll-tell-you-what-your-kinks-are dress code? When did you last have to look at a mandoms straining barely-leather-trouser-contained package on a forum? When did anyone last sidle up to you on a blog and calmly tell you that you shouldn’t be embarrassed about having your arse stuck up in the air when you’re being flogged – lots of girls feel that way but they soon get to like it. (What? What made you think I wanted to be flogged? The thing where I stood here with a vagina?) And when, tell me when, did you last visit a BDSM website that employed a prodom as ‘house mistress’ to stand on the fucking door and intimidate you with an establishment-sanctioned man-pleasing version of what your sexuality was meant to be before you even stepped over the fucking threshold?

(Sometimes I say prodoms are the gatekeepers of femdom – meaning that they are the first thing anyone will see of this kind of sex be that online or in mainstream media. But in real life at a lot of kinky nightclubs they actually make that literally true. Do they have a ‘house’ mansub – ha ha, of course not! That might be, like, nice and welcoming for dominant women.)

Not that the internet isn’t fucked. It all is. Just don’t get me wrong thinking I only mean online because I never go out to these places anymore.

I don’t think things are so fucked because I don’t go out. I don’t go out because things are so fucked.

Not that this should be read as some kind of yay for kink on the internet. The internet is full of horrifying shit.

More stuff I wrote about this

6. Male submission is about heroic masculinity and male beauty.
(Fuck, though – forget that whingery: this is the most important point of all. If you’ve been skimming - just pay attention to this bit.)

Do some great fun sexy shit where he’s all kneeling and getting hurt and liking it and being ashamed and getting hard and having trouble carrying on looking you in the eye is about sex. It is sexy.

Don’t let the asshats who have wrung the sex out this stuff win. Don’t let them trick you that femdom is about as fun for women as a weight watchers meeting. Don’t let them tell you it’s about his tiny cock and him dressed in frillies and you actually having to go get someone else to fuck you because that is so much more humiliating for him and by the way he’s not worthy of your glorious cunt, Tsarina.

That’s not it. (And in fact, I have no idea what *that* actually is)

This is what it is

I’m a straight woman. Men and masculinity turn me on. Maleness. Male beauty. Men are so heart stoppingly beautiful. The shape of a young fit man’s body. When his abdomen is concave and hard and the ratio between his shoulders and his hips is almost preternatural. All men are beautiful. High foreheads. Big hands. From the shape of their arms to the fact that the greatest ever skin sensation play tool actually grows out of their fucking faces. Men are made for sex. (And I didn’t even mention cocks in drawing that conclusion. But, god, if you weren’t convinced. Cock. Cock is amazing. The greatest sex toy in the world.)

And nowhere is this male beauty expressed better than in male submission. Jack doesn’t like pain, doesn’t enjoy suffering at all. But he is hot and hard for being brave. Making noble almost futile sacrifices.

Bondage and force. Wanting to contain and constrain. To own. To force. To crush and possess. To venerate. To wallow in. To touch. This is about beauty. Male beauty. Savage beauty. Sexuality so virile and strong it needs to be held back, diluted with chains and cages to make it palatable – otherwise it would be so overwhelming it would be like looking at the sun.

It is everything there is and every part of the heart of me.

And it’s worth it. Even now.

More stuff I wrote about this

Conclusion
But of course, regular readers already know all this. This is old news for them. So a treat. A special. An all new revelation.

I forget who actually pointed this out to me – but it was probably Pan or Jack, all things considered. But here is the truth, something you ought to know: For all the talk that is talked about me and how I do the things I do and what you may have seen on TV, I actually do not own a single pair of pyjamas.

Read more here

65 Comments

  • Bitchy, I’m just so delighted to have found your blog.

    I feel almost the same way as I did when I first read Little House in the Big Woods…you mean there’s loads of this? You mean she’s written tons of stuff, and I can read it all?

    Obviously in your blog there are fewer bears, pigs on sledges and maple syrup sugar snow parties. And a lot more hitting and stuff.

    Other than that, the delight I feel in discovering the world of Bitchy Jones is the same. Thanks for the round-up. I shall carry on rooting quietly through your wares, if I may…thank you

  • You should have PJs. I can’t live without the things myself.

    Also, I don’t care if it’s a rehash of the entire blog (which I read in one glorious night of awakening), I love hearing you say this stuff. Hell, I needed to hear another woman say this stuff and say it like you did. Because of you, the men around me are now running scared.. And god it turns me on when they do that.

    Although I do still love my high heeled boots (no thigh highs, kthx) and my high heeled shoes or varying kinds. Really, I have no problems walking (or running, and yes I will chase you if I have to) in them and I think it’s more of the sound that the right high heeled footwear makes on a tiled or paved surface that does it for me. I like to think that it’s the warning sound for impending doom (not mine, either). And sometimes… I just like loud shoes because it’s childish and annoys others.

    In short, hooray for Bitchy!

  • Agreed…. although the local bdsm community helped me step out of a kinky sexual closet, it amazed me that I found very little in common with the majority of them. What I thought I needed, I didn’t. What I thought I was, I wasn’t.

    It was like studying Star Wars to try and become an astronaut.

    Mainstream bdsm was an important part of self discovery and I’m glad I experienced it. It’s just not me.

    Thanks for the eloquent words Bitchy… keep them coming.

  • I used to be one of the missing women from 4.

    Repelled by SM as I found it presented in mainstream media. Repelled by the stereotype of the dominatrix. Repelled by the stereotype of the pathetic male masochist.

    Thinking: “I don’t want to be a woman who gets paid to inflict pain-on-demand on a succession of clients whom she doesn’t share a private life with, whom she doesn’t sexually desire, let alone have sex with or love.”

    I remember very well that this used to be my notion of what SM supposedly was. So, obviously, it appeared, sadomasochism was not for me.

    I could not connect this prejudiced view to all my fantasies about… a man who falls to his knees on the hot sand; a man who pulls against the shackles and screams as a whip hits his back; a man who bends his will to another person’s will.

    Until I found information about SM between private people who actually like each other, beyond repellent stereotypes.

    Yes, male submission is so beautiful.
    Thanks for writing.

  • Love you, lady!

  • I wish more thought the way you do.
    I’m sure I’m not alone in that.

  • There’s a lot of things I like about reading your blog. You’re thoughtful and non-traditional. You genuinely like what you do and like writing about it. And I agree with a lot of your opinions. For instance, as a male masochist, I find the weird sexist overtones of forced feminization really distasteful. If I’m reading a sex story and the guy is forced to wear panties, I generally stop reading.

    But I think I’ve figured out what it is that I don’t like and how to express this clearly. It’s the “my way is the only right way” attitude. Now, mind you, I say this as someone whose way is a lot more like yours than like the people you call asshats. We don’t wear a lot of kinky gear. Neither of us own any black leather garments. My wife doesn’t own any spike-heeled shoes, much less wear them when we’re playing.

    So we’re a lot more like you than we are like them, but still, there’s not just one way to do it. And just because it turns you on to do it one way doesn’t mean that everyone else should do it that way too. Some people like black leather and spike heels and being called fancy names. What I don’t understand is why you think that this has anything to do with your sexuality, much less why you think that it is ruining it.

    When you complain about people forcing their idea of how things should be on you, I completely sympathize. You gripe about people assuming that you aren’t dominant because you don’t meet their stereotypes. But then you turn around and assume that other people aren’t really dominant just because they do meet the stereotypes.

    Much of the time, it seems to me that your attitude is just as one-size-fits-all as theirs is. My wife, bless her, loves to hear the little gasps and moans which I let out when she squeezes and slaps my testicles. And she loves to see me all worked up and desperate to fuck her, knowing that I’m not going to be able to that night. But she wouldn’t want to see me chained to a radiator. And she isn’t particularly into noble acts of submission. So apparently, she just doesn’t get it. She also didn’t know that she was going to like it until she tried it. So it may be something which you’ve always known about yourself, but not everyone works like that.

    I’m glad that you’re happy with the path you’ve chosen. I’m glad that you like playing the way you play with the people you play with. But don’t assume that everyone else ought to be doing it the same way you are and that if they did it would make things more welcoming and a gazillion dominant women magically appear.

    There are a lot more men who like sniffing women’s shoes than there are women who like having their shoes sniffed. There are a lot more men who want to dress up as babies than there are women who want to take care of them. So maybe there really are more men who want to be dominated than women who want to dominate them. Women and men are not treated symmetrically in our culture, so the same cultural forces don’t act on them in the same way. That said, there may be about the same number of non-asshole man submissives as there are dominant women, but that’s really a separate issue.

  • Understand my blog like this: Every representation of my sexuality is fucked up. So here’s one that isn’t. My sexuality is mine. What I say certainly very clearly speaks to other people. But my blog is about me - not your wife.

    My blog is not about that kind of femdom that a wife does when a husband asks her to. It just isn’t. It is about female desire. It is about my desires.

    A lot of people like to say, as you do, oh no, the femdom demographic issue is due to cultural forces. This is because if this is the case it is not their fault femdom is so fucked - it’s society, man! But I happen to think my reasonings are a lot more likely and compelling. Most submissive men don’t like the idea that there would be enough dominant women - the dream!- if they just stopped being such sexist arseholes.

    I don’t think niche fetishes are the same thing at all. And I don’t much care about them. I am talking about a very broad sexuality and I certainly get plenty of anecdotal evidence from women commenting and emailing saying, yes, this is reason I have not been able to express my sexuality before.

    I’m sorry you don’t like me thinking my way is best - but I do. And really, what else the fuck has kept me going this long on my own against a huge fucking dragon when people who should be with me are standing there ninnying and wondering if I shouldn’t be nicer to people who like leather?

  • I’ve been reading your blog for a good while now, and I find that I agree with - or at least *like* - most of what you say. Despite, of course, the fact that I fall into the group of kinky people who this is the /least/ aimed at - I’m a female submissive. A bisexual female submissive, at that, who has regular doms of both genders.

    But then I don’t have a whole lot to do with what most people would call The Kink Scene. I’ve never been to a fetish club. I do, however, have an active social life with a large group of wonderful friends of various different kinky persuasions. We hold play parties. They’re hot. And you know where I found these people? Not the fetish scene at all - the goth scene and the bi scene. Why is it that the sane people who like hitting people with stuff (not to mention being hit with stuff!) end up in other subcultures? Probably because you’re right.

    I find it interesting, though, that you so rarely mention the femsubs. Is it because you think they’re less fucked up (or fucked over by The Scene, or whatever) than the rest, or is it just that we’re all beneath contempt? (This last comment may not be entirely serious.)

  • I have several very good friends who are femsubs. I know there is a lot of fucked up there. But it’s a different kind of fucked up.

    Also, I am self obsessed. And not a femsub. So meh sometimes rules the day. Fact is though, there is masses and masses of female-authored interesting stuff about femsub. There is much less (i.e. none) about femdom.

  • The only thing I strongly disagree with in this post is about the kink scene. At least locally, ours is wonderful. No, no dress code, no house mistress (although there are house submissives, of both genders, who mostly work the door and ensure the coffee is made). The assumptions and off putting comments are no more than if I went to the local bar, and primarily by the same few individuals, so it’s easy to avoid in the future.

  • Dear Bitchy,congratulations on your first blog anniversary!It takes a lot of courage to go against so many rigid ideas!

    I had a lot of intelligent things to say,but it was all reduced to one : thanks for saying Belle de Jour is a complete bore, from the fake snob tone,to the pseudo-intellectual writing .

    Fortunately,there’s blogs like yours!

  • Fabulous! I’ve only just got into the whole blog scene, and I have to say, yours stands out by a mile from many of the others around. I too agree with your Belle de Jour comments. Just wish she’d get over herself.

    Thank you and keep on going!!

  • I remember your blog from the Informed Consent days - it was one of my favourite things on that site. Thank you for summarising the story so far.

    These are all great points and there’s so much I agree with, but I just have one little quibble. I do get that you’re making a point about wanting women to be free to explore their own orientation, and how these representations of what sexually dominant women are supposed to be into are more likely to put them off. I’m very much with you on that (and totally with you on ‘man-pussy’ - I wish I could not only unread it but unsee the mental picture it produced). Where I start to part company a little is with the idea that strap-ons and forced feminisation are insulting to women. Yes, they are, on the outside. But on the inside - I think people can be as liberal, as feminist, as open-minded as they like, but they still have practically no control over what turns them on - even if what turns them on is not at all PC. Although I’m sure there are some misogynists who are into strap-ons or forced feminisation, having that kink doesn’t make people anti-women any more than me wanting to hit men makes me anti-men.

  • Now Bitchy, I mostly agree with you. However, if I may, I shall play the devil’s advocate on a couple of points:

    Forced feminisation (he would argue), is not about how ridiculous the man LOOKS, but rather how he FEELS. It is a practical way to tap into a humiliation spot in most males, hit them in their masculinity. The Dom is reveling in the weakness of the man without their precious masculinity, which they cling to like a blanket. It’s all about getting him into a certain head-space, using societal conditioning to do so.

    Now, is that an arguable point, would you say? It doesn’t devalue either masculinity of femininity, it just is using an culturally given instinctual bias to fuck with someones head.

  • Mirehn, I know that one is for Bitchy,but allow me to disagree with you :D.

    If a man feels he’s entering masculineness because he’s wearing woman’s clothing,the dom is so much is so responsible for that as the person taking your blood in a hospital is responsible for your fear of needles. Besides,one does not loose one’s femininity or masculinity due to clothing!

    And I wonder,what’s the point? What’s the point of exploring one’s weaknesses in order to make him or her achieve a “head-space”? One thing is BDSM,another is trying to fuck with someone’s head,which,in my opinion,is rather cruel. Not only our heads are already quite fucked up,as the thought of someone getting off of going that far is quite disturbing.

    What’s the point of being an heterosexual dom,if a woman likes making her man look un-masculine?
    Calling,like Bitchy exposed,man-pussy to the man’s arse hole? I mean,it’s a pussy such a symbol of weakness? It should be,on those women’s heads,because most of them need pseudo-phallus penetrating the men-pussies in order to feel powerful. I wonder whose head is being most fucked,sincerely.

  • Perhaps you havn’t been to Pedestal when you say there are no male house subs to entertain the women who (frequent is the wrong word as Pedestal is anything but frequent) enjoy a night out.
    Although it is true Pro Doms do go to these clubs I have only once had the misfortune to interact in a sexual way with one.If I had known I would have found it even less sexy than it was.
    What grabs me is that the person really is into what she is into and is not doing it to pander to someone elses ideosyncracies especially for money.

  • Isn’t pedestal run by a prodom?

  • Now, is that an arguable point, would you say? It doesn’t devalue either masculinity of femininity, it just is using an culturally given instinctual bias to fuck with someones head.

    Where do ‘cutural givens’ come from? We don’t exist in a vacuum. Using the fact that some men believe that being feminised is degrading endorses that belief and makes it stronger.

    Also, it can’t work if I don’t think it’s degrading too. This is like the submissive who says, ‘oh please make me do X’ where X is whatever his fetish is from wearing a nappy to licking high heels, ‘X is so degrading. It makes me feel so submissive’. It is the way submissive men (one of the ways, they are manipulation masters) get dom women to do whatever they want - by saying nothing makes them feel more submissive.

    You know what interests me, what the women want. How they feel. What makes them feel powerful and exciting.

  • We love you too.

  • Off-topic, Bitchy, but I would like your opinion: You just mentioned that Pedestal is run by a prodom. Do you have any hypotheses on who actually runs OWK? I’ve always suspected that OWK is run by men, specifically a group of German businessmen/investors. It appears to be a brothel with a rapidly revolving cast of hirees, and I’ve always thought it would be interesting to follow where the money is going. I know you’ve masturbated to it before, but I’d like your thoughts on this. Happy anniversary, BTW.

  • How would I know. All I know about OWK is that once, on their website they had a lot of detailed information about their ‘prison’ and they don’t even have that anymore.

    I wish they were run by me.

  • Yes I think Pedestal is run by a Pro Bitchy, there are some Pro’s out there with a socially productive view.

    So the OWK is run by men and has female Pro Dommes, mostly just a business as is mentioned with the word “Brothel” which I was suprised was used to be honest seeing as I thought many people dont equate Pro Dommes to prostitutes. I’m not sure that bitchy is trying to address whether its men or women that do what so much as the emphasis, I might be wrong I dont know.

    I applied to be one of those house thingies at club Ped once and the reply mentioned “There is no charge for this you dont have to pay” kind of put me off as though I should have been expecting too, bit too patronizing for me. I cant point the finger though seeing as I suppose that had to be mentioned knowing the common way of doing things.

    Interesting point by femsup, interacting with a Pro for me whether paying or not would also be a real turn off so I can relate to that. This is why at times I prefer not to go out seeing as often I get dragged off by someone and I wouldnt know.

    I think as far as masturbating over OWK is concerned, its just porn at the end of the day like a Pro Domme except in 2D. Its not as if anyone ever had any political views in their sexual fantasies, its just fantasy! Personally I try to avoid masturbating over Pro Dommes though while doing that doesnt even turn me on anyway, a bit like how people say that F/m porn is said to be a turn off to Dommes.

  • “You know what interests me, what the women want. How they feel. What makes them feel powerful and exciting.”

    Exciting or excited?

  • Excited

    Or Possibly I meant excitatificated

  • I would like to feel that way.

  • Question (which, hopefully, I’ll remember to come back for the answer this time!): What about the women who *pretend* to be trailblazers, pretend to be sexually liberal, but who are just sexual fuckups who don’t know the first thing about sex, dominance, submission, or even orgasm. (List condensed for the sake of time.) Are they still trailblazers for being good sheep, or are they part of the problem as well?

  • I’m struggling to understand the question. Could you give me examples or something.

  • Er, I guess I’m asking about the fake tossers parading around the internet who haven’t been shagged for ages, but maintain active sex blogs detailing their latest whippings, spankings, acts of dominance, etc — all while promoting feminism while rambling on about their sexual liberation. There are loads of them, surely you’ve seen a few?

  • Oh *them*. Yes there are a lot of sex bloggers now. I am very okay with women expressing their desires and writing about what turns them on. Why wouldn’t I be. But they key is seperating the thrill of sexual desire with the thrill of being desired.

    ‘Cause a lot of these blogs aren’t really about female desire - and I’m guessing these are the ones that trouble you. They are actually about how pretty she looks, how pretty *he* thinks she looks and, hey guess what, what he bought for her. (also how much he earns, how important he is, how he cheats on his wife for her, how he paid for the hotel/meal/show.) Which is back in Belle territory.

  • Well Bitchy, although I can see where you are coming from, not everyone thinks of it the same way, or are wired like that. Personally, I don’t really care what I’m doing to someone (although I have a few favorites… ;) when I’m a Dom, its all about the effect my action has. If I want them to feel degraded (not really my thing, but everyone differs) then I might put them in a situation they feel uncomfortable. If making them feel that feels better than any cosmetic downside, then why not?

    And you can feel uncomfortable becoming effeminate without thinking that femininity is a bad thing. A lot of guys who are totally ‘with’ femininity being equal to masculinity, simply feel uncomfortable when they personally are made to be effeminate. For whatever reason, it’s that which is the focus, not: “Ooo look, you’re a woman. How degrading.”

    Coralina thank you very much for your reply! If I may address some parts of what you said individually:

    [Besides,one does not loose one’s femininity or masculinity due to clothing!]

    People can feel like they do. And opinion (or perspective), when dealing with the mind, is of the utmost importance.

    [And I wonder,what’s the point? What’s the point of exploring one’s weaknesses in order to make him or her achieve a “head-space”? One thing is BDSM,another is trying to fuck with someone’s head,which,in my opinion,is rather cruel. Not only our heads are already quite fucked up,as the thought of someone getting off of going that far is quite disturbing.]

    Isn’t that what most of BDSM does, exploit someone’s weaknesses to get them into a certain situation? Exploiting the fact that their desire will hold them still as you put on the cuffs, so they can be trapped later? I firmly disagree that putting people into “head-spaces” is cruel. It’s practically everything I do, from my specific corner of the D/s world! Remember, the point is people WANT to be in that head-space, so there is no cruelty in getting them there, especially if you enjoy it too.

    Again, this isn’t my personal interest, either way around. However I DO think it is legitimate for people to enjoy it, without it being necessarily sexist, or ‘wrong’ somehow.

  • I don’t get the way you say you do humiliation - would you just do anything the guy found humiliating - I don’t really get how that is dominant, rather than facilitating his desires. I honesty think so much of female sexuality is skewed to being about *his* reactions. I thought this was meant to be about my desires and kinks and fetishes. Note how the ‘forced’ fem aspect always makes it into something the woman wants to do - that she is forcing him to do. But it isn’t, is it? Like you say, not your thing. It is no woman’s thing.

    And would you really do anything he found degrading? Anything? I mentioned something about equating it with white slaves blacking up for humiliation, but I felt uncomfy and deleted it.

    It is never just about being degraded with no contact with the outside world. Otherwise just, I dunno, dress up as a clown or something.

    But, no, it is *always* as a woman. And that’s the real problem. That this is the default image of a submissive man. Something no woman would want. And they don’t. They are hardly queuing up for this. That and strap on sex -sensation free sex. Nice.

    Because, see for all you (and others) say your way is not the only way, Beej, not every woman is wired like you, and I say, well there are a fuck more wired like me (and put off femdom for life) than there are wired for doing femdom as we currently know it. BECAUSE WHERE ARE THEY?

    And the kicker is a man can be humiliated and still be attractive. God, believe me.

  • This post was a great way of summarizing the last year on your blog… I was reading, calmly enjoying, and then, boom:

    “the greatest ever skin sensation play tool actually grows out of their fucking faces.”

    Yes. God, yes. This is probably the second most arousing male attribute.

  • I never, ever suggested that you make your blog about anything other than your own desire. I’m thrilled to see you be you and express your own way of doing things. I’m glad to see someone out there saying, “this is my way, and it’s cool.” I love that you love what you’re doing and love talking about it. It’s nice to see someone out there expressing something other than the stereotypical way of doing things. And like I said, it’s much more like my way than the mainstream scene is.

    But there’s a big difference between saying “my way is awesome” or even “my way is better” and saying “their way is wrong”. You don’t just say that your way is best, you say that their way is fundamentally broken and evil. Just because I like it your way better than their way doesn’t mean that I’m going to stand with you in saying that their way is wrong. I don’t think that their way is wrong. Ridiculous, perhaps. But lots of people do lots of things silly ways. It’s not a war. It’s not us or them. Things don’t have to be one way.

    That guy dressed up in assless chaps and dancing down mainstreet in the gay pride parade is gay, so is that guy in the business suit on his lunch hour waiting for his husband to meet him so that they can review the adoption papers. You get to be a femdom wearring jeans and a sweatshirt, but guess what, that woman in the leather bustier who’s having the guy lick her boots, she might just actually be a femdom too. They can have it their way, and you can have it your way and that’s fine. And when you’re really comfortable with yourself, you won’t worry about what they do, because it’s not relevant.

    Of course, I don’t really know why I’m bothering to write this. You’re probably not really ready to hear it. And you already know that it’s kind of hurtful to tell people that their deepest desires are wrong. That’s why you’re always careful to couch any criticism of people in the mainstream scene in terms which suggest that they don’t really mean what they’re doing, that they don’t really feel it deep down like you feel it. They’re just in it for the money or to fulfill someone else’s fantasy or because they’re clueless knuckledraggers. They’re not serious about it, because if they were, then you would have just said something genuinely hurtful about a whole bunch of people most of whom you’ve never met and well, that would be a different kind of mean. So of course they can’t be serious.

    And if malesubs only appear to outnumber femdoms because men are asses, then why do femsubs outnumber maledoms? Friends of mine in the gay community tell me that subs outnumber doms there too. Is every BDSM community pushing the doms out or are there just less?

    I’m sorry dear, but as much as you might find the story of the missing femdoms compelling, you aren’t speaking for some imaginary oppressed dominant masses. You’re speaking for yourself. And that, well, that’s what people like about you. I just wish you’d embrace that. You aren’t alone out here outside the BDSM mainstream, and you don’t need imaginary friends. Besides, even if they did exist, maybe they wouldn’t like your way any more than they like the mainstream’s way.

    Anyway, I’ve said my peace. You can work out for yourself whether or not it’s worth anything to you.

  • I think it might help, smack, if you do what I do: just keep reminding yourself that it’s the default-images-of-femdom that are being discussed and dismissed, not individuals’ kinks. I love bitchy blog, but I do have to remind (or lie to) myself of that at times.

  • Oh come off it, Mr Smack Mr Nuts, Don’t equate different kinds of perceived femdom to the different kinds of perceived gay male sexuality. Why? Because there are different kinds of perceived gay male sexuality. Face it, leather bustier woman *is* a real femdom. And I’m not. Never will be. Don’t wear the uniform.

    Also, there are more femsubs and than mandoms… ha ha ha. No, there *aren’t*, Mr Smack My Nuts. And nowhere else in kink has such a huge notable disparity as femdom. The whole community is built on the disparity. That is the difference, Mr Smack My Nuts.

    I am right. I know how hard *I* find the way my sexuality is represented. I know how much that puts me off. And I know how hot male submission is. I know my explanation is the only one that makes sense.

    The deal is simple - you can swap your woman-hating brand of femdom for one that has actual women in it, enjoying it. Not being talked into it, not doing favours, acting on desire. Would you like that, Mr Smack My Nuts? I’m not sure submissive men even would.

    And yeah, I’m sure if I was totally sure of myself and had no insecurities whatsoever I would feel different. Sure I would, because I would be from space! Who the fuck is ‘really comfortable with themselves’. I have never met anyone like that.

    But, cuh, perhaps you are right, perhaps someday I will become so comfy with myself that I become totally insular and apathetic and will never ever think about anyone else or what they are doing or how it affects me or anyone else. That might be nice. How long do you think I will have to wait for that?

    Are you that happy and content, Mr Smack My Nuts who finishes he blogcommentrant by saying, I’m sorry dear? (hi, welcome to how asshat men undermine women’s opinions 101.)

    Don’t worry, I’m probably just hysterical. I’ll go and lie down.

  • As soon as I read the word “dear” I felt a rumbling on the other side of the Atlantic.

  • Smack my Nuts:

    “or they’re just in it for the money or to fulfill someone else’s fantasy”………..”I’m sorry dear, but as much as you might find the story of the missing femdoms compelling”

    So you didnt know that before the internet during the inception of the fetish scene as much as it would have been smaller in scale there where loads of Dommes and more F/m relationships? while now we have got even more skewed numbers and less F/m relationships with more emphasis on money and getting a fix since the internet opened the doors wide open to the masses and the most erect ideologies took over?

    If you want to know about missing Femdoms then why not try and find out for yourself rather than pass it off because they are missing and you cant see them anyway?!

  • I love you, you know. I really do. Thank god there’s someone saying this stuff.

    Now, I could do with a little help. Or advice. Or something. I’m one of the possibly-dominant women who never imagined they might have dominant leanings, because all the dominant women I’d ever encountered in the media were asshats and everything was so fucked up. There’s been something missing in my sex life right from the start, and when you start talking about the stuff in point 6, I recognise it. But what the hell do I do now? Because as much as I love the guys-hurting thing, I seriously struggle with the idea of being the person hurting them. I can’t find a way into that that doesn’t make the whole idea feel horrible. You know, there’s some fairly hefty emotional and psychological programming running contrary to that kind of stuff. Given that, how do I even explore this stuff? Is it a question of finding the right rp, the right story? And an equally large problem - with everything so fucked up, how do you even find people to explore it with?

  • Em,

    You can be dominant without being a sadist. You can boss people without hurting them. There’s a whole smorgasbord of activities to choose from. Sorry, slow day here, should have let Bitchy answer the question.

  • But if you don’t hurt them, then you don’t get to see them in pain…

    The problem is not that I don’t want to hurt them. It’s that I think that if I do I’ll feel horrible about it. Do you see what I mean?

  • Yeah. I don’t know if I know the answers to your questions. In fact, I have this problem, when I say their are bunches of hidden dominant women and I am going to make them understand - part of me thinks I shouldn’t. Because even without all the asscrap, this is no picnic.

    So you have to think it’s worth it. You have to want it that much.

    Jack, say, Jack likes what we do. Jack wants me to hurt him more than I do. And I still get horrors afterwards. I still cry about it. I still get scared.

    How do you not feel bad about it? No idea - but if you find out, tell me.

    How do you find decent nice good men who are into this stuff too? Um, trial and error? There are a lot of them but a lot of them have been screwed by the crap.

    I’m no help, I know. All I can say is - seeing a man in pain for you, seeing him suffer, learning the faces he makes when he tries to deal with pain - it’s all so worth it.

  • You might want to read this one, if you haven’t

    http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/04/17/what-it-feels-like-to-hurt-a-man-until-it-makes-you-have-an-orgasm/

  • Perhaps, Em, you are a more of a voyeur, and you should attend play parties where the man is getting hurt and you just sit there and eat snacks.

  • I’m not exactly sure if Em is actually in need of either hurting a man or watching a man get hurt. Maybe what Em needs is a submissive man who will do what she asks, but not one to get hurt physically. Howsabout, “now fuck me hard, boy, and don’t stop until I say so?”

    …well, it always worked on me.

  • “the media”

    Irony perhaps being that showing that is PC while M/f is not so PC because the showing of F/m being PC is for the same reason that the showing M/f isn’t as much. The difference being how one is more financial and on the fore while the other more social orientated but not.

    I think most sexumentaries on the media its usually about some kind of commercial sex (I might be wrong) unless its in the context of something else. Stuff like the reserved quiet female Librarian on the Road trip film.

    The media issue might be one thing while accessibility for Dommes behind all that might be another as well, I think its probably quite complicated. What p***es me sometimes is how I notice some Dommes try to get involved then dissappear after a short while. So where I say accessibility behind all that I mean getting people of like mind in the same place as each other rather than drips and drabs like a swimmer asking where the water is on a football pitch while the footballer wants the boxer to go in goal who is asking where his opponent is while the Snooker player has just noticed the Jockeys horse relieved itself on the chess players board.

  • “But if you don’t hurt them, then you don’t get to see them in pain…

    The problem is not that I don’t want to hurt them. It’s that I think that if I do I’ll feel horrible about it. Do you see what I mean?”

    EM it might be that you are hurting yourself by not doing what you want to do to a bloke.Bottling it up is surely worse than interacting with a fella who really loves what you have to give to him.
    I know lots of people get that programming that says its unfeminine to be sadistic and that you should be all caring but your wish to inflict pain is a caring act to those who enjoy it.
    And there are different levels of pain you could inflict.Surely just pinching his bottom extra hard would not be to frightening for you?

  • Em, my guess is that if No.6 pushes your buttons, then hurting men is your kink, and you’re stuck with it. I know just what you mean about struggling to accept it - I’ve been there. Personally, I found that going out and doing it was part of coming to terms with it. I had to SEE that it was OK, not just accept it intellectually. Of course, to the right guy, your evil desires are not just OK but positively a gift. That helps too. You may be on the brink of a thrilling adventure, and I wish you luck. It is so worth it in the end.

  • I didn’t call you “dear” to belittle you. I called you “dear” because I like you. Because although I’ve only been reading what you write, I’ve come to consider you dear. If it offended you or you felt belittled, I’m sorry. It wasn’t my intent. And yes, I do call men “dear” as well. I wasn’t trying to lessen you. I was just trying to talk to you the same way you seem to talk to other people so that maybe you’d listen to me. I guess I didn’t succeed.

    Just because I introduced my wife to trying BDSM play does not mean that 1) I hate women (really, WTF?) and that 2) she does it just to please me and not because she desires to. She likes it quite a bit and she initiates the play and decides how and when it will happen and how far she’ll go. I introduced her to it. I didn’t brainwash her or manipulate her or demand anything of her. I didn’t say “if you love me, you’ll beat my balls.” She gave it a try because she found the idea intriguing, and she does it because she likes it. If I were calling the shots we’d use more toys, and she’d be more merciless, but I’m not calling the shots, nor do I want to. So we do what she wants to do when she’s in the mood to. You don’t have to sell me on the idea of not being an asshole and playing with someone who is a real woman and who really wants to do it. That’s my life.

    I was reading around, and I saw a statistic from a survey which said that 25% of BDSM practitioners knew from childhood that they were into it. Congrats on being in that 25%, but the other 75% of us didn’t figure out what we were into until we read some particular story and felt intrigued or tried something new we’d never tried before and discovered that it affected us in ways that we didn’t expect. So don’t jump to conclusions just because someone didn’t know it from birth.

    And, yes, I am that content. I used to worry about how other people would see me and my kink and whether or not I could fit into the mainstream bdsm scene (I can’t). I used to worry about whether I was submissive enough or if I was maybe just a masochist and not a submissive at all. I tried to figure out what the right box for me was and how to deal with it. But at this point, I’m content in me and in my own relationship. I don’t know what box I fit in, and I don’t care. Other people’s categories and what they do and how they present themselves don’t affect me or my sexuality. I have a terrific partner who I love and who likes to play with me so how other people play or present themselves is irrelevant. It’s not apathy, it’s an understanding that there is space for us all and that having a certain sexuality doesn’t mean having to belong to a certain community. It’s living in that place on the other side of anger or fear, once you get past it.

    The only thing I do is try from time to time to intercede to try to make the ball-busting and CBT forums that I stop in on from time to time a little more welcoming to women, but frankly, it’s a losing battle. These days, I mostly just stay away from those forums because the good guys (and gals) have been completely overwhelmed by the assholes. (If you think that mainstream BDSM areas are anti-woman, you should see those places. There are regular forum threads about which celebrities they want to kick their balls and which women who post are real and which are just men pretending to be women. And any time a woman does post, she get bombarded with questions about what she’s into and how many guys she’s kicked in the balls and how and what shoes she’s worn when she’s done it. The guys there complain about a lack of women, but they don’t really act like they want them around.

    Although I suspect that you’re wondering if I’m that content, why am I worrying about you? Well, in a sense, I’m not, since I don’t want to you to change your sexuality or how you present it at all. That part I think is terrific. It’s the anger which bothers me. I like you and I think that your blog is terrific, but I cringe at it every now and again when you treat it as a battle between you and them, because it doesn’t have to be and things are a lot easier when we’re not trying to fight battles all the time.

    I guess I hadn’t said my peace after all.

  • What is so wrong with being angry. It’s a very legitimate response. Better than withdrawal into a private world.

    I think CBT is nearly always something the man wants the woman to do.
    http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/09/17/cbt-zomgz-wtf/
    (Skip the comment thread - it all gets kind of crazy)

    Not that there is anything wrong with the woman doing what the man likes per se, just that
    (a) There is way too much of it in femdom steamrollering over any representation of real female desire
    (b) The internal narrative of femdom means even though it is the guy that wants it, it has to be all twisted up and made out to be the woman’s desire - ’cause oh yeah, she is in control, she is *making* me.

    Wouldn’t it be so refreshing is a vanilla conversion would just once say, yeah she does it for me because she loves me.

    So, a question, the one I always want to ask but-now-she-loves-it conversions, if you split up, would your wife then have the futile task of having to talk all her future boyfs into letting her kick them in the nuts?

  • “I know lots of people get that programming that says its unfeminine to be sadistic and that you should be all caring but your wish to inflict pain is a caring act to those who enjoy it”

    The last 7 words particularly the 2nd to last making it not the oxymoron it might seem, I think it’s about getting it in the right context.

    Some people say that trying both topping and bottoming is a good idea in order to get perspective of both. The same kind of original reservation that Em expresses here that I had is diminishing with me as I recalibrate my fantasy / reality comfort interpretation pain / pleasure /sex reward pathway pivot and become a switch and more adept kinky female slave handler, obviously in the same way along the lines of the last 7 words of femsups quote above, mutual fun.

    I think another important factor is partners maintaining a healthy perspective of each other and not correlating BDSM to who you are as people. Communication being very important to let each other know how you feel about it and not afraid to ask questions, Em’s query here for example being just the right kind of thing to do.

    I think on the whole Bitchy is right with how in general a lot is not about Females desires so much this is actually something that is often addressed by many other Dommes too. I started a thread about F/m porn and representation elsewhere and the replies where quite interesting, to summarize in my own words from what I gathered;

    “The Domme enjoying it being of importance, as in not just enjoying watching from the 3rd person, but the Domme in the film enjoying it herself for the Domme watching to enjoy watching a Domme enjoying”

    I think that is interesting when looking at the poster “powergay” comment on the “Why 95% of Dommes agree with everything I say” thread where he said; “the woman is a passive non-existent identity in most straight porn where the main focus has always been on the man”

    I changed my name from “popo” to something more humorous.

  • Well, the problem with being angry is that it takes a lot of energy, and it doesn’t usually get much done. (Although, yes, it can produce some pretty damn funny writing sometimes.) Anger as an immediate response to something is normal and healthy. Anger which lingers on and on and on isn’t. It’s sort of like washing an iron skillet. Using water is the best way to get it clean, but if you leave the water there for more than a few minutes, it’ll start to corrode.

    I don’t know about you, but when I’m angry about something, I have a lot of trouble figuring out how to actually deal with it in a rational way. If I want to get something done about something, the first step is getting past anger. Anger usually says “things shouldn’t be like this! Things should be different!” But while I’m angry, I can’t make it to that next step, which is “okay, things are this way whether or not they should be. What can I do to make things more like they should be?”

    And that’s really the sort of discussion I want to have. And I think that means moving beyond a battle perspective. They have all sorts of communities and institutions and web sites about doing things their way. Tearing it down isn’t going to work. Instead, we need an alternative. And maybe this isn’t the right place for the discussion of what that should be, I don’t know. I just know that you’re one of the few people who talks intelligently about what could be better about femdom and BDSM on a grand scale, so it seems like it might be a good place to start.

    To answer your other question about if my wife and I split up (actually, mentally, I’m rephrasing that to “if I died in a horrible car accident” because otherwise I’m having difficulty with the plausibility of the hypothetical) would she try to introduce future boyfriends to some form of CBT: I don’t know. I know that she isn’t shy about initiating play, that she has her own ideas about what she wants to do and how, and that she gets significantly aroused by doing it (enough that I can tell, and I’m not the best observer of subtle signs). Does this mean that she enjoys it enough that if she didn’t already have a willing partner she would try to find or create one? I honestly don’t know. We haven’t ever really talked about it at that level and, obviously, in practice it’s never come up.

    You also have to keep in mind that this is a woman who is still getting in touch with her own desires to some extent. Prior to dating me she was in a ten year relationship with a man she didn’t love and where they had to watch porn together in order to get her sufficiently in the mood so that they could have sex. So though I think that she would want to squeeze the balls of future partners, that doesn’t necessarily mean that she would actually go through with trying to introduce them to it.

  • I spent a long time reading these and being extremely confused about how unsympathetic the cognitive behavioural therapists on that forum sounded.

    Whoops.

    Anger’s a natural - and, as other posters have mentioned, occasionally difficult - part of any relationship. Of course it needs to exist within certain boundaries, but the discussion here and also in Bitchy’s post here http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/01/19/topping-from-the-bottom-or-from-beneath-you-it-devours/ reminded me of this from Denise Levertov:

    Alison, understand
    There comes
    a time
    when only anger
    is love

    Sure, she may have been talking about Vietnam, but I think it stretches.

  • I come to leave a nice, congratulatory comment for the Bitchy Jones- but I stay to watch the circular logic and lulzy, panic mode rationalization.

    I heart you BJ, destroyer of worlds. Don’t ever stop.

  • This has been a busy chitty-chatty post. I should write another. But I want to write a lot of sex and filth and Jack has fallen asleep.

    And I did so want to do the research first.

    Ah well….

  • A big thanks to everyone for the encouragement. I hope Lorelin’s right, and I am on the verge of an adventure. I just have no idea how to find out, though! I’m not the kind of person who can experiment with people she doesn’t know well - I tend not to be interested sexually until I know someone well - so that makes things kind of tricky. And I largely find the kink scene (I have friends who are pretty involved) cheesy and uncomfortable. That’s not just true of kink, though, your average vanilla porn makes me equally uncomfortable. One of the things I like so much about your writing, BJ, is that it shows us something real between two people. I can’t bear the primping and preening and ridiculous heels and fake breathy moans and utter lack of actual feeling that most public domain sex-related stuff involves. I can’t bear fakery, and I can’t bear anything intended for display. I guess the problem with the kink scene is the problem with any gathering of people - that although many of them are fantastic, a large proportion are colossal knobs (no offense to knobs). And that’s bearable when you join, say, a chess club or a dance group, but just horrible when you’re dealing with something as intimate as sex.

    Incidentally, the post you recommended was the first one I read when I came across your blog and realised you is an genius. I find it both very scary and strangely reassuring.

  • And again - seriously, thanks, everyone. Your positivity really helps.

  • Oh, I meant to say before, orgasm control is quite a nice way to make someone suffer without hurting them. I’m pretty sure it ticks the same boxes as actual sadism.

    Oh and I don’t go out on the kinky scene at all. I don’t like it. I don’t like socialising with people and especially not knobs. So I use internets to meet people. I met Jack through this blog and before that I used Informed Consent.

  • Bitchy Jones, you have a new, adoring reader. This was my first visit to your blog and although I am not kinky, I hungrily devoured every word and comment and give thanks for the whole new world and way of thinking that it has introduced to me. Thankyou for letting us inside your head.

  • Perhaps you’ve already addressed this in your posts on the matter and I’ve missed it…about the strap-on thing. I’m not dominant, but I am the owner of a couple of strap-ons. My mate likes them. He also likes to be fucked by men, but I’m not one, so when we can’t find a suitable one, I do my best to take care of that desire for him. Is this good, in your estimation? I like to get fucked. He likes to get fucked. We both try to do it for each other. It’s only the power-equals-cock thing to which you object…? I’m hoping?

  • There’s nothing wrong with using a false cock for sex. I know I do.

    What you have to understand is that strap on *is* the sex of femdom. And femdom is also full of anti PIV sex messages. Which, in turn, imply that women who have control don’t want PIV sex. As if getting fucking us is just a favour we allow men.

    *Rage*. *Boil*

  • I’m almost afraid to comment, cause I don’t want to be one of your asshats.
    I’ve done the prodom thing. I definitely see what you mean about it- I had to go independent cause the dungeons thought I was… well, too queer for them. I didn’t do the thigh highs and heels thing, and I didn’t think male submission was something to laugh at.
    I do giggle a lot, though. Mainly because I find it sexy and fun, and sometimes I can help giggling because it’s just all so delicious.
    I will say that your blog helped me come out of the closet. When I did prodomming I couldn’t really be sexual because there were boundaries and that would cross those. Sex work needs boundaries. And I figured I was a submissive outside of the professional life, because I didn’t know how to be dominant if I didn’t want to dress up in corsets and stilettos.
    But I wasn’t submissive. I was scared. And your blog told me it was ok to like men who desired submission. It was ok to not be into dressing up and gendered humiliation. It was ok to like intercourse and still be in charge.
    I’m not articulate enough to really express how grateful I am. You changed my world, BJ. And I’m better for it.
    (and, for whatever reason, I hope you don’t think I’m an asshat, even though this is the ‘net and I’ll probably never meet you.)

  • I don’t think you’re an asshat so much as proof that being dominant in your actual life and being dominant for money probably aren’t really very compatible actually at all.

  • Oh and don’t mention it on the life-changing thing. That’s the mission. Happy to be of service.

  • “I don’t think you’re an asshat so much as proof that being dominant in your actual life and being dominant for money probably aren’t really very compatible actually at all.”

    That’s so true. How are you really being the dominant if you have to follow HIS script? Always drove me crazy.

Leave a Reply