<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pretty Vacant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/pretty-vacant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/pretty-vacant/</link>
	<description>It's good to be mean</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/pretty-vacant/#comment-8352</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-8352</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t being sexist, most men are on the make as well. 

How else could we get women to dress up to indulge our tacky sexual fantasies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t being sexist, most men are on the make as well. </p>
<p>How else could we get women to dress up to indulge our tacky sexual fantasies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bitchyjones</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/pretty-vacant/#comment-8351</link>
		<dc:creator>bitchyjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-8351</guid>
		<description>How dare you call you sexist discredited armchair grasp of sociobiology Darwinism</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How dare you call you sexist discredited armchair grasp of sociobiology Darwinism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/pretty-vacant/#comment-8350</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-8350</guid>
		<description>So Pedestal was full of women dress up to indulge the sexual fantasies of men for financial motives (or if you want to be less vulgar about it-making a pragmatic Darwinism decision to attract a potential partner who can provide security for herself and her off-spring).

This is hardly a radical observation and can be seen in any environment rich and/or famous but ugly fat men congregate. Yes I know money doesn&#039;t bring happiness and should be searching for me lasting charming and intelligent traits in their partners, but sadly most people would like the benefit of the doubt.

You may say Femdom is “charmless, brash and stupid, has no sense of irony and no sense of fashion, aesthetics and no class” but that description could apply to any bar/club meat market on a Friday night.

You might feel more at home hanging around the South Bank to meet witty, wise sophisticates but you will only not find a shortage of crudely dressed high heeled women to bitch about; academics have big wallets and indexed linked pensions as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Pedestal was full of women dress up to indulge the sexual fantasies of men for financial motives (or if you want to be less vulgar about it-making a pragmatic Darwinism decision to attract a potential partner who can provide security for herself and her off-spring).</p>
<p>This is hardly a radical observation and can be seen in any environment rich and/or famous but ugly fat men congregate. Yes I know money doesn&#8217;t bring happiness and should be searching for me lasting charming and intelligent traits in their partners, but sadly most people would like the benefit of the doubt.</p>
<p>You may say Femdom is “charmless, brash and stupid, has no sense of irony and no sense of fashion, aesthetics and no class” but that description could apply to any bar/club meat market on a Friday night.</p>
<p>You might feel more at home hanging around the South Bank to meet witty, wise sophisticates but you will only not find a shortage of crudely dressed high heeled women to bitch about; academics have big wallets and indexed linked pensions as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProsDidMe4Free</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/pretty-vacant/#comment-7975</link>
		<dc:creator>ProsDidMe4Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-7975</guid>
		<description>When clearing the table of broken bits trying to work it out I suppose you could just simplify the whole thing and look at how Pro Domming is a job founded on a lack of acceptance of F/m  (this is what Pro Dommes say). 

Therefore if F/m as a scene is loads of Pro Dommes then you could just take the individual circumstance of how 1 Pro Domme is a job founded on the lack of acceptance of F/m then times it by 100,000.

Its just sociology, I blame subs too though its not as if 10% of Dommes contacts aren&#039;t offering them money whithin an environment that the main / only viable existance is as a Pro.

According to simple logic (not opinion) by relation a Pro Domme is wishfull thinking if she thinks she will find a boyfreind, thats pretty obvious when we consider most Dommes aren&#039;t around although reading between the lines it would seem that Pro Dommes wouldn&#039;t be interested in actually dating a $ub.  I think this is a poinient factor if we are to consider how much a vested interest Pro Dommes claim to have in the scene.

Nobody F***s with £150-£250 an hour (or whatever rip off it is) it F***s with you.

lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When clearing the table of broken bits trying to work it out I suppose you could just simplify the whole thing and look at how Pro Domming is a job founded on a lack of acceptance of F/m  (this is what Pro Dommes say). </p>
<p>Therefore if F/m as a scene is loads of Pro Dommes then you could just take the individual circumstance of how 1 Pro Domme is a job founded on the lack of acceptance of F/m then times it by 100,000.</p>
<p>Its just sociology, I blame subs too though its not as if 10% of Dommes contacts aren&#8217;t offering them money whithin an environment that the main / only viable existance is as a Pro.</p>
<p>According to simple logic (not opinion) by relation a Pro Domme is wishfull thinking if she thinks she will find a boyfreind, thats pretty obvious when we consider most Dommes aren&#8217;t around although reading between the lines it would seem that Pro Dommes wouldn&#8217;t be interested in actually dating a $ub.  I think this is a poinient factor if we are to consider how much a vested interest Pro Dommes claim to have in the scene.</p>
<p>Nobody F***s with £150-£250 an hour (or whatever rip off it is) it F***s with you.</p>
<p>lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beeble</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/pretty-vacant/#comment-7969</link>
		<dc:creator>beeble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-7969</guid>
		<description>&quot;You say my criticisms of femdom are distortions. Do you believe then that there is nothing wrong with femdom and the way it represents and fails dominant women.&quot;

Straw man.  There&#039;s a whole world of shades of grey between &quot;BJ&#039;s criticisms of femdom are distortions&quot; and &quot;there is nothing wrong with femdom&quot;.

Putting the cart before the horse.  &quot;the way [femdom] fails dominant women&quot; already assumes that there is something wrong with femdom, prejudging the question.  Even if femdom were perfect (which I grant it isn&#039;t), how could anyone possibly answer, &quot;Nah, there&#039;s nothing wrong with femdom,&quot; given the immediate implication that it fails dominant women in just the right way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You say my criticisms of femdom are distortions. Do you believe then that there is nothing wrong with femdom and the way it represents and fails dominant women.&#8221;</p>
<p>Straw man.  There&#8217;s a whole world of shades of grey between &#8220;BJ&#8217;s criticisms of femdom are distortions&#8221; and &#8220;there is nothing wrong with femdom&#8221;.</p>
<p>Putting the cart before the horse.  &#8220;the way [femdom] fails dominant women&#8221; already assumes that there is something wrong with femdom, prejudging the question.  Even if femdom were perfect (which I grant it isn&#8217;t), how could anyone possibly answer, &#8220;Nah, there&#8217;s nothing wrong with femdom,&#8221; given the immediate implication that it fails dominant women in just the right way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProsDidMe4Free</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/pretty-vacant/#comment-7968</link>
		<dc:creator>ProsDidMe4Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-7968</guid>
		<description>When Dommes don’t bother with the scene, don’t hang around long or just aren’t in the scene as so often described by the scene itself in a beligerant “Don’t look at us not our fault actually its your fault!” kind of way then it can hardly come as a surprise that if Pro Dommes come onto someone with no context for their sexuality at the time then when looking around, think its some kind of sick weirdo trick.

Utterly lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Dommes don’t bother with the scene, don’t hang around long or just aren’t in the scene as so often described by the scene itself in a beligerant “Don’t look at us not our fault actually its your fault!” kind of way then it can hardly come as a surprise that if Pro Dommes come onto someone with no context for their sexuality at the time then when looking around, think its some kind of sick weirdo trick.</p>
<p>Utterly lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProsDidMe4Free</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/pretty-vacant/#comment-7963</link>
		<dc:creator>ProsDidMe4Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-7963</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  In a similar way as described here when I ignorantly used to see the occasional Pro a very long time ago the disparity of looks between them and their boyfreinds was astounding.  

One had an awful habit of whinging to me about her love life I can&#039;t see why though its not as if she hasn&#039;t made a career out of the repression of her own sexuality must be half asleep or something.

I think this thread really points out why Femdom is a no go area for many.

Perhaps alternatly to the weird stuff here about male subs supposed to be unnatractive etc, one could say there is something uniquely erotic about submitting to a member of the fairer sex with 1o times less testosterone because the initial apparent grounds make there more skewed power psychologicaly while knowing that the biggest sexual organ is the brain and sex is all psychological anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  In a similar way as described here when I ignorantly used to see the occasional Pro a very long time ago the disparity of looks between them and their boyfreinds was astounding.  </p>
<p>One had an awful habit of whinging to me about her love life I can&#8217;t see why though its not as if she hasn&#8217;t made a career out of the repression of her own sexuality must be half asleep or something.</p>
<p>I think this thread really points out why Femdom is a no go area for many.</p>
<p>Perhaps alternatly to the weird stuff here about male subs supposed to be unnatractive etc, one could say there is something uniquely erotic about submitting to a member of the fairer sex with 1o times less testosterone because the initial apparent grounds make there more skewed power psychologicaly while knowing that the biggest sexual organ is the brain and sex is all psychological anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bitchyjones</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/pretty-vacant/#comment-7957</link>
		<dc:creator>bitchyjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-7957</guid>
		<description>The tricky thing about this is I think you have a good point. Just not quite.

Here&#039;s what I think: Sometimes femdom is indefensibly awful. Sometimes I am uncomfortable with myself. And sometimes I think femdom has a kind of sub-awfulness where it doesn&#039;t give me a space to me a doubting self-loathing mess.

Sometimes I don&#039;t see the difference. 

Not that I think the ideas I write about (including the above) are all about me not being happy with who I am - but I will admit that it is sometimes fueled by reasons other than the delivery of piercing shards of truth.

(Now I feel bad that I have said that a buried it in the comments. I&#039;ll try and write a post about it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tricky thing about this is I think you have a good point. Just not quite.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I think: Sometimes femdom is indefensibly awful. Sometimes I am uncomfortable with myself. And sometimes I think femdom has a kind of sub-awfulness where it doesn&#8217;t give me a space to me a doubting self-loathing mess.</p>
<p>Sometimes I don&#8217;t see the difference. </p>
<p>Not that I think the ideas I write about (including the above) are all about me not being happy with who I am &#8211; but I will admit that it is sometimes fueled by reasons other than the delivery of piercing shards of truth.</p>
<p>(Now I feel bad that I have said that a buried it in the comments. I&#8217;ll try and write a post about it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seafield</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/pretty-vacant/#comment-7956</link>
		<dc:creator>Seafield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-7956</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re still doing it , making hard to accept the sexualities of other people.

You&#039;ve gone from this :

&quot;the wider world of horrible femdom.&quot; - BJ

and now redefined  it, adding another negative :

&quot;I also do not like the male-authored representation of my sexuality. I call them both horrible.&quot; - BJ

I think you&#039;re still looking for reasons not to accept other peoples versions of your `frightening&#039; sadism. Your sadism has been described by a man, so I could reject you as male-authored. But that would be bollocks. The wider world of femdom has *mostly* been described by men, yes, but its just a real as the sadism in you.  It all needs to be accepted and understood. By hating the different versions of sadism and masochism in others, you are making it harder to accept your own, because they&#039;re probably  related. 

&quot;This is the most misogynistic sexual sub culture in the world.&quot; - BJ

There&#039;s absolutely no way your last statement is true, sorry.  But perhaps another example of the demonizing of female dominance.

Yes of course there are things wrong with femdom, lots of things and it is too focused on male fantasies. Hopefully we can agree on these two things about femdom.  We need to work harder at representing its femaleness. We need to work harder at accepting the real diversity of femdom and fetishism. 

But please, dont throw out  the baby with the bath water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re still doing it , making hard to accept the sexualities of other people.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve gone from this :</p>
<p>&#8220;the wider world of horrible femdom.&#8221; &#8211; BJ</p>
<p>and now redefined  it, adding another negative :</p>
<p>&#8220;I also do not like the male-authored representation of my sexuality. I call them both horrible.&#8221; &#8211; BJ</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re still looking for reasons not to accept other peoples versions of your `frightening&#8217; sadism. Your sadism has been described by a man, so I could reject you as male-authored. But that would be bollocks. The wider world of femdom has *mostly* been described by men, yes, but its just a real as the sadism in you.  It all needs to be accepted and understood. By hating the different versions of sadism and masochism in others, you are making it harder to accept your own, because they&#8217;re probably  related. </p>
<p>&#8220;This is the most misogynistic sexual sub culture in the world.&#8221; &#8211; BJ</p>
<p>There&#8217;s absolutely no way your last statement is true, sorry.  But perhaps another example of the demonizing of female dominance.</p>
<p>Yes of course there are things wrong with femdom, lots of things and it is too focused on male fantasies. Hopefully we can agree on these two things about femdom.  We need to work harder at representing its femaleness. We need to work harder at accepting the real diversity of femdom and fetishism. </p>
<p>But please, dont throw out  the baby with the bath water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranai</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/pretty-vacant/#comment-7955</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=212#comment-7955</guid>
		<description>I think, Sardax, a lot of the women who are into drawing porn, including porn of tied up and whipped men, focus entirely on the men so they don’t have to bother with female representations that bore them or remind them of [insert cliché]. So if they include more than one human figure, they draw Yaoi. I don’t draw myself, but the drawn porn that gets me off is usually yaoi, by female and male artists, Japanese as well as Western fanart. (And yaoi porn struggles to free itself from its own arsenal of clichés!)

But perhaps over the time more dom women will venture into making hetero porn as well. That would be nice.

Photographers: I so agree, I would love to see this too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, Sardax, a lot of the women who are into drawing porn, including porn of tied up and whipped men, focus entirely on the men so they don’t have to bother with female representations that bore them or remind them of [insert cliché]. So if they include more than one human figure, they draw Yaoi. I don’t draw myself, but the drawn porn that gets me off is usually yaoi, by female and male artists, Japanese as well as Western fanart. (And yaoi porn struggles to free itself from its own arsenal of clichés!)</p>
<p>But perhaps over the time more dom women will venture into making hetero porn as well. That would be nice.</p>
<p>Photographers: I so agree, I would love to see this too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
