<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prepare to be Enraged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/prepare-to-be-enraged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/prepare-to-be-enraged/</link>
	<description>It's good to be mean</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ranat</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/prepare-to-be-enraged/#comment-8466</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 04:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=264#comment-8466</guid>
		<description>When I first came out to myself, &quot;Yes, Ma&#039;am&quot; was one of two books on kink I found in the sexual health section of the bookstore I was trapped in for eight hours. Two. I read it (hidden behind the pages of another book so no one could see the cover) in about three hours, and the whole thing left me with, &quot;Ummm...&quot; I was trying to explore my sexuality, and it seemed all the people who shared my sexuality were really homogeneous (homogeneous and liked things that were not what I wanted), at least according to this little sliver of femdom. Definitely off-putting. 

Since then, in my desperate bid to find something that *did* fit my sexuality (miserable failure), &quot;Yes, Ma&#039;am&quot; stands out as a prime example of the mediocre stereotypes of femdom that apparently I am doomed to slog through for the rest of my days.

Women in waders are way sexy. But not the kind on the cover of the first book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first came out to myself, &#8220;Yes, Ma&#8217;am&#8221; was one of two books on kink I found in the sexual health section of the bookstore I was trapped in for eight hours. Two. I read it (hidden behind the pages of another book so no one could see the cover) in about three hours, and the whole thing left me with, &#8220;Ummm&#8230;&#8221; I was trying to explore my sexuality, and it seemed all the people who shared my sexuality were really homogeneous (homogeneous and liked things that were not what I wanted), at least according to this little sliver of femdom. Definitely off-putting. </p>
<p>Since then, in my desperate bid to find something that *did* fit my sexuality (miserable failure), &#8220;Yes, Ma&#8217;am&#8221; stands out as a prime example of the mediocre stereotypes of femdom that apparently I am doomed to slog through for the rest of my days.</p>
<p>Women in waders are way sexy. But not the kind on the cover of the first book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaVacheEnragee</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/prepare-to-be-enraged/#comment-8277</link>
		<dc:creator>LaVacheEnragee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=264#comment-8277</guid>
		<description>I love you, Bitchy.  
I am a steaming pot of rage.  Pop cultural representations of female domination leave me feeling alienated, baffled, hopeless.  A true dominant accomplishes more in the spontaneity of her actions than any thigh-high boot donning, PVC dress wearing, &quot;mistress&quot; with a whip can ever hope to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love you, Bitchy.<br />
I am a steaming pot of rage.  Pop cultural representations of female domination leave me feeling alienated, baffled, hopeless.  A true dominant accomplishes more in the spontaneity of her actions than any thigh-high boot donning, PVC dress wearing, &#8220;mistress&#8221; with a whip can ever hope to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: temporaryname</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/prepare-to-be-enraged/#comment-8241</link>
		<dc:creator>temporaryname</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=264#comment-8241</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;As the saying goes, make it, and they will come, and in terms of material geared and focused towards female desire (as opposed to being a desirable female), I would argue that that is, quite literally, true.&lt;/I&gt;

Yeah, I remember the late 80s/early 90s boomlet in &#039;porn mags for women&#039; - For Women, Ludus, Women Only, Women on Top, Playgirl - they all died a slow death, either for the reason the Girl With A... mentioned or because (I suspect) of the the assumptions that &#039;nice girls&#039; didn&#039;t read/want that kind of thing. Given the changes in sexual culture in the UK since then (the internet, legal hardcore, Ann Summers, this blog), it must be about time someone had another go, complete with male erections (there must be a market beyond Scarlet...). I can see Bitchy and the Girl With A... as resident columnists already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As the saying goes, make it, and they will come, and in terms of material geared and focused towards female desire (as opposed to being a desirable female), I would argue that that is, quite literally, true.</i></p>
<p>Yeah, I remember the late 80s/early 90s boomlet in &#8216;porn mags for women&#8217; &#8211; For Women, Ludus, Women Only, Women on Top, Playgirl &#8211; they all died a slow death, either for the reason the Girl With A&#8230; mentioned or because (I suspect) of the the assumptions that &#8216;nice girls&#8217; didn&#8217;t read/want that kind of thing. Given the changes in sexual culture in the UK since then (the internet, legal hardcore, Ann Summers, this blog), it must be about time someone had another go, complete with male erections (there must be a market beyond Scarlet&#8230;). I can see Bitchy and the Girl With A&#8230; as resident columnists already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elle</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/prepare-to-be-enraged/#comment-8237</link>
		<dc:creator>Elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 03:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=264#comment-8237</guid>
		<description>I have a theory for the covers: they simply put pictures of the same woman on both books, to save money. See? Not sexist, just cheap.   ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a theory for the covers: they simply put pictures of the same woman on both books, to save money. See? Not sexist, just cheap.   <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Madison</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/prepare-to-be-enraged/#comment-8236</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=264#comment-8236</guid>
		<description>Even if there are women who like to dress up in rubber and sit around the house, that doesn&#039;t make the covers OK.

There are probably men who like to lounge around their houses in leather G-strings, so why not put them on the cover?  

These covers have nothing to do with what women want, or even what they like to wear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if there are women who like to dress up in rubber and sit around the house, that doesn&#8217;t make the covers OK.</p>
<p>There are probably men who like to lounge around their houses in leather G-strings, so why not put them on the cover?  </p>
<p>These covers have nothing to do with what women want, or even what they like to wear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reb</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/prepare-to-be-enraged/#comment-8235</link>
		<dc:creator>reb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=264#comment-8235</guid>
		<description>Bitchy, I saw &lt;a href=&quot;http://thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=632092&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; website and thought just of you....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bitchy, I saw <a href="http://thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=632092" rel="nofollow">this</a> website and thought just of you&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eccentrica</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/prepare-to-be-enraged/#comment-8234</link>
		<dc:creator>Eccentrica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=264#comment-8234</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re so right. And so funny. Please write a book. It would kick arse in more ways than one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re so right. And so funny. Please write a book. It would kick arse in more ways than one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Girl with a one track mind</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/prepare-to-be-enraged/#comment-8233</link>
		<dc:creator>Girl with a one track mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=264#comment-8233</guid>
		<description>OK, I&#039;ll hold my hands up as a woman that -occasionally- likes to wear a bit of rubber, because it turns me on (in and of itself), so I suppose it&#039;s fair to say that some women do indulge in a rubber fetish. But, Axe, what you&#039;re arguing, is that because of that, that somehow explains why both these book covers have images of women on them, and I fail to understand that. What about the fact that I like to look at men dressed in rubber? Where is that represented? In any erotica book -supposedly- geared towards (straight) women, why am I being sold the idea that women should be the object of desire and not the subject/eg. reader? It&#039;s as if women don&#039;t objectify men at all, and we all know that&#039;s not true. What is true is that sexism is endemic in publishing; these covers illustrate that perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;ll hold my hands up as a woman that -occasionally- likes to wear a bit of rubber, because it turns me on (in and of itself), so I suppose it&#8217;s fair to say that some women do indulge in a rubber fetish. But, Axe, what you&#8217;re arguing, is that because of that, that somehow explains why both these book covers have images of women on them, and I fail to understand that. What about the fact that I like to look at men dressed in rubber? Where is that represented? In any erotica book -supposedly- geared towards (straight) women, why am I being sold the idea that women should be the object of desire and not the subject/eg. reader? It&#8217;s as if women don&#8217;t objectify men at all, and we all know that&#8217;s not true. What is true is that sexism is endemic in publishing; these covers illustrate that perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bitchyjones</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/prepare-to-be-enraged/#comment-8232</link>
		<dc:creator>bitchyjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=264#comment-8232</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I know women who enjoy dressing up like that because it they like how it makes them feel. Some dress up and spend a few hours just lounging around the house because they enjoy the way it feels.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Okay, maybe it&#039;s coincidence but I can&#039;t help noticing that this kind of comment is nearly always made by men. I&#039;m not saying that you&#039;re lying, I&#039;m sure dominant women did tell you they love to dress up like your trashy fantasies for their own enjoyment - I&#039;m just wondering what their motivation for telling you that could have been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;I know women who enjoy dressing up like that because it they like how it makes them feel. Some dress up and spend a few hours just lounging around the house because they enjoy the way it feels.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Okay, maybe it&#8217;s coincidence but I can&#8217;t help noticing that this kind of comment is nearly always made by men. I&#8217;m not saying that you&#8217;re lying, I&#8217;m sure dominant women did tell you they love to dress up like your trashy fantasies for their own enjoyment &#8211; I&#8217;m just wondering what their motivation for telling you that could have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maymay</title>
		<link>http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/prepare-to-be-enraged/#comment-8231</link>
		<dc:creator>maymay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/?p=264#comment-8231</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it. Where&#039;s the picture of the second book?

Oh, wait. I get it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it. Where&#8217;s the picture of the second book?</p>
<p>Oh, wait. I get it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
